| Message ID | 51775D88.2000406@asianux.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:20:24PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > If CONFIG_MMU is disabled, it will let ARM9TDMI and ARM7TDMI visible, > but in fact, only AT91X40 need ARM7TDMI, so need not let them visible. I'll apply it myself this evening. Can I add: Tested-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> to it?
On Apr 25, 2013, at 1:46 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:20:24PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >> If CONFIG_MMU is disabled, it will let ARM9TDMI and ARM7TDMI visible, >> but in fact, only AT91X40 need ARM7TDMI, so need not let them visible. > > I'll apply it myself this evening. Can I add: > > Tested-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> you add it mine too Tested-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Best Regards, J. > > to it? > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On 2013?04?25? 01:46, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:20:24PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >> > If CONFIG_MMU is disabled, it will let ARM9TDMI and ARM7TDMI visible, >> > but in fact, only AT91X40 need ARM7TDMI, so need not let them visible. > I'll apply it myself this evening. Can I add: > > Tested-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> > > to it? > > Ok, thanks. this patch is really provided by you (Arnd also provided the same patch, but it seems a little later than you). And I really only reported and tested it. And next, I should continue to find and make another patches for ARM. Thanks.
On 2013?04?25? 01:59, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On Apr 25, 2013, at 1:46 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:20:24PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >>> >> If CONFIG_MMU is disabled, it will let ARM9TDMI and ARM7TDMI visible, >>> >> but in fact, only AT91X40 need ARM7TDMI, so need not let them visible. >> > >> > I'll apply it myself this evening. Can I add: >> > >> > Tested-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> > you add it mine too > > Tested-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt index 6c24985..dc972e1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91X40 select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER select SPARSE_IRQ + select CPU_ARM7TDMI endchoice diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig index 9e8101e..3397d05 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ comment "Processor Type" # ARM7TDMI config CPU_ARM7TDMI - bool "Support ARM7TDMI processor" + bool depends on !MMU select CPU_32v4T select CPU_ABRT_LV4T @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ config CPU_ARM740T # ARM9TDMI config CPU_ARM9TDMI - bool "Support ARM9TDMI processor" + bool depends on !MMU select CPU_32v4T select CPU_ABRT_NOMMU
If CONFIG_MMU is disabled, it will let ARM9TDMI and ARM7TDMI visible, but in fact, only AT91X40 need ARM7TDMI, so need not let them visible. Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> --- arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt | 1 + arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)