Message ID | 0a546c3de84c4650d019274debef0ded9007b36f.1370004925.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 05/31/2013 07:55 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > - p = (u32 *)of_get_property(op->dev.of_node, "xlnx,dcr-splb-slave-if", NULL); > - tft_access = p ? *p : 0; > + of_property_read_u32(op->dev.of_node, "xlnx,dcr-splb-slave-if", > + &tft_access); This is okay, but just FYI, you could instead have just used be32_to_cpup().
On 05/31/2013 03:05 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 05/31/2013 07:55 AM, Michal Simek wrote: >> - p = (u32 *)of_get_property(op->dev.of_node, "xlnx,dcr-splb-slave-if", NULL); >> - tft_access = p ? *p : 0; >> + of_property_read_u32(op->dev.of_node, "xlnx,dcr-splb-slave-if", >> + &tft_access); > > This is okay, but just FYI, you could instead have just used be32_to_cpup(). yep. I was there in v1 but then Soren suggested to use of_property_read_u32 http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/29/365 Thanks, Michal
diff --git a/drivers/video/xilinxfb.c b/drivers/video/xilinxfb.c index af0b4fd..aecd15d 100644 --- a/drivers/video/xilinxfb.c +++ b/drivers/video/xilinxfb.c @@ -406,8 +406,7 @@ static int xilinxfb_release(struct device *dev) static int xilinxfb_of_probe(struct platform_device *op) { const u32 *prop; - u32 *p; - u32 tft_access; + u32 tft_access = 0; struct xilinxfb_platform_data pdata; struct resource res; int size, rc; @@ -427,8 +426,8 @@ static int xilinxfb_of_probe(struct platform_device *op) * To check whether the core is connected directly to DCR or PLB * interface and initialize the tft_access accordingly. */ - p = (u32 *)of_get_property(op->dev.of_node, "xlnx,dcr-splb-slave-if", NULL); - tft_access = p ? *p : 0; + of_property_read_u32(op->dev.of_node, "xlnx,dcr-splb-slave-if", + &tft_access); /* * Fill the resource structure if its direct PLB interface