Message ID | 1370646215-6543-26-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Patch looks ok but why not combine this patch with the previous one? Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 06/16/2013 04:31 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote: > Patch looks ok but why not combine this patch with the previous one? > Because even though they both touch asm-offsets.c, they are offsets for unrelated structures. I could try distributing these changes across several other patches, but getting the patch dependencies/ordering correct can be tricky. David Daney > Ralf > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c index 37fd9e2..db09376 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <linux/kvm_host.h> #include <asm/kvm_mips_te.h> +#include <asm/kvm_mips_vz.h> void output_ptreg_defines(void) { @@ -345,6 +346,8 @@ void output_pbe_defines(void) void output_kvm_defines(void) { COMMENT(" KVM/MIPS Specfic offsets. "); + OFFSET(KVM_ARCH_IMPL, kvm, arch.impl); + OFFSET(KVM_VCPU_KVM, kvm_vcpu, kvm); DEFINE(VCPU_ARCH_SIZE, sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu_arch)); OFFSET(VCPU_RUN, kvm_vcpu, run); OFFSET(VCPU_HOST_ARCH, kvm_vcpu, arch); @@ -411,5 +414,9 @@ void output_kvm_defines(void) OFFSET(COP0_TLB_HI, mips_coproc, reg[MIPS_CP0_TLB_HI][0]); OFFSET(COP0_STATUS, mips_coproc, reg[MIPS_CP0_STATUS][0]); BLANK(); + + COMMENT(" Linux struct kvm mipsvz offsets. "); + OFFSET(KVM_MIPS_VZ_PGD, kvm_mips_vz, pgd); + BLANK(); } #endif