diff mbox

ACPI / scan: Always call acpi_bus_scan() for bus check notifications

Message ID 1373398362.24916.4.camel@misato.fc.hp.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Toshi Kani July 9, 2013, 7:32 p.m. UTC
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 02:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> An ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK notification means that we should scan the
> entire namespace starting from the given handle even if the device
> represented by that handle is present (other devices below it may
> just have been added).
> 
> For this reason, modify acpi_scan_bus_device_check() to always run
> acpi_bus_scan() if the notification being handled is of type
> ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>

Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

But, I think we need the additional patch below.

Thanks,
-Toshi

 		struct acpi_scan_handler *handler;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Rafael Wysocki July 10, 2013, 12:11 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 01:32:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 02:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > 
> > An ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK notification means that we should scan the
> > entire namespace starting from the given handle even if the device
> > represented by that handle is present (other devices below it may
> > just have been added).
> > 
> > For this reason, modify acpi_scan_bus_device_check() to always run
> > acpi_bus_scan() if the notification being handled is of type
> > ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> 
> But, I think we need the additional patch below.

Yes, I think you're right.

Thanks,
Rafael



> =====
> From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Do not call attach() if device is attached
> 
> attach() of ACPI scan handlers does not expect to be called multiple
> times on a same device.  Also, the attached handler may not be changed
> without calling its detach().  Change acpi_scan_attach_handler() not
> to call attach() when the given device is already attached.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c |    3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 20757e0..2b9e867 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1885,6 +1885,9 @@ static int acpi_scan_attach_handler(struct
> acpi_device *device)
>  	struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> +	if (device->handler)
> +		return 1;
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) {
>  		const struct acpi_device_id *devid;
>  		struct acpi_scan_handler *handler;
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
diff mbox

Patch

=====
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Do not call attach() if device is attached

attach() of ACPI scan handlers does not expect to be called multiple
times on a same device.  Also, the attached handler may not be changed
without calling its detach().  Change acpi_scan_attach_handler() not
to call attach() when the given device is already attached.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 20757e0..2b9e867 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1885,6 +1885,9 @@  static int acpi_scan_attach_handler(struct
acpi_device *device)
 	struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if (device->handler)
+		return 1;
+
 	list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) {
 		const struct acpi_device_id *devid;