diff mbox

[1/2,v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore "E" attribute in mas2

Message ID 1374153543-10734-1-git-send-email-Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Bharat Bhushan July 18, 2013, 1:19 p.m. UTC 
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com>
---
v2:
 - No change 
 arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Comments

Alexander Graf July 18, 2013, 2:48 p.m. UTC | #1 
This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?


Alex

On 18.07.2013, at 15:19, Bharat Bhushan wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - No change 
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h |    2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
> index c2e5e98..277cb18 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *to_e500(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> #define E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_UX|MAS3_UR|MAS3_UW)
> #define E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_SX|MAS3_SR|MAS3_SW)
> #define MAS2_ATTRIB_MASK \
> -	  (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1)
> +	  (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1 | MAS2_E)
> #define MAS3_ATTRIB_MASK \
> 	  (MAS3_U0 | MAS3_U1 | MAS3_U2 | MAS3_U3 \
> 	   | E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK | E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK)
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Bharat Bhushan July 18, 2013, 3:12 p.m. UTC | #2 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
> Behalf Of Alexander Graf
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan
> Bharat-R65777
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore "E" attribute in mas2
> 
> 
> This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?

What I understood is that "there is no reason to stop guest setting "E", so allow him."

-Bharat

> 
> 
> Alex
> 
> On 18.07.2013, at 15:19, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - No change
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h |    2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h index
> > c2e5e98..277cb18 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
> > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500
> > *to_e500(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) #define E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK
> > (MAS3_UX|MAS3_UR|MAS3_UW) #define E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK
> > (MAS3_SX|MAS3_SR|MAS3_SW) #define MAS2_ATTRIB_MASK \
> > -	  (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1)
> > +	  (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1 | MAS2_E)
> > #define MAS3_ATTRIB_MASK \
> > 	  (MAS3_U0 | MAS3_U1 | MAS3_U2 | MAS3_U3 \
> > 	   | E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK | E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK)
> > --
> > 1.7.0.4
> >
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body
> of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Alexander Graf July 18, 2013, 3:19 p.m. UTC | #3 
On 18.07.2013, at 17:12, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:

> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
>> Behalf Of Alexander Graf
>> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM
>> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
>> Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan
>> Bharat-R65777
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore "E" attribute in mas2
>> 
>> 
>> This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
> 
> What I understood is that "there is no reason to stop guest setting "E", so allow him."

Please add that to the patch description. Also explain what the bit means.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Bharat Bhushan July 18, 2013, 3:20 p.m. UTC | #4 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:agraf@suse.de]
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:50 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore "E" attribute in mas2
> 
> 
> On 18.07.2013, at 17:12, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org
> >> [mailto:kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM
> >> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> >> Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
> >> Bhushan
> >> Bharat-R65777
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore "E" attribute
> >> in mas2
> >>
> >>
> >> This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
> >
> > What I understood is that "there is no reason to stop guest setting "E", so
> allow him."
> 
> Please add that to the patch description. Also explain what the bit means.

Ok :)

-Bharat
> 
> 
> Alex
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Scott Wood July 18, 2013, 4:15 p.m. UTC | #5 
On 07/18/2013 10:12:30 AM, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org  
> [mailto:kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
> > Behalf Of Alexander Graf
> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:18 PM
> > To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> > Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood  
> Scott-B07421; Bhushan
> > Bharat-R65777
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore "E"  
> attribute in mas2
> >
> >
> > This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
> 
> What I understood is that "there is no reason to stop guest setting  
> "E", so allow him."

FWIW, it'd probably be safe to let the guest control the G bit as well.

-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
index c2e5e98..277cb18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@  static inline struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *to_e500(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 #define E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_UX|MAS3_UR|MAS3_UW)
 #define E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_SX|MAS3_SR|MAS3_SW)
 #define MAS2_ATTRIB_MASK \
-	  (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1)
+	  (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1 | MAS2_E)
 #define MAS3_ATTRIB_MASK \
 	  (MAS3_U0 | MAS3_U1 | MAS3_U2 | MAS3_U3 \
 	   | E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK | E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK)