| Message ID | 20130831170422.GA21617@localhost (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi, Ezequiel On 9/1/2013 1:04 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:23:53PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 11:36 +0800, Josh Wu wrote: >>> This patch fix following warning: >>> >>> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c:2007: warning: 'atmel_nand_nfc_match' defined but not used >>> >>> This patch add '#if defined(CONFIG_OF)' block to guard around the definition of >>> atmel_nand_nfc_match, in order to avoid the warning when kernel is configurated >>> as non-dt supported. >> Ick. This driver is littered with CONFIG_OF checks. Yet I've just seen a >> patch to pxa3xx_nand which *removes* ifdefs, on the basis that all the >> of_match_ functions/macros will just 'do the right thing'. Can't we do >> that here too? We might just need to add __maybe_unused? >> > We can. We just need to provide a few dummy functions in linux/of_mtd.h > just like the other of_xxx() are doing. See below! > >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF) >>> static struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { >>> { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" }, >>> { /* sentinel */ } >>> }; >>> +#endif >> Also, why doesn't this one appear in a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() ? >> > Indeed. And why doesn't it have a "const" keyword? Thanks to point these out. > > So, in order to remove the CONFIG_OF safely from this driver, > and avoid any stupid warnings, we need to first implement > these dummies: > > --------------------------------8<----------------------------------- > diff --git a/include/linux/of_mtd.h b/include/linux/of_mtd.h > index ed7f267..66f173e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/of_mtd.h > +++ b/include/linux/of_mtd.h > @@ -14,6 +14,21 @@ > int of_get_nand_ecc_mode(struct device_node *np); > int of_get_nand_bus_width(struct device_node *np); > bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np); > +#else > +static inline int of_get_nand_ecc_mode(struct device_node *np) > +{ > + return -ENOSYS; > +} > + > +static inline int of_get_nand_bus_width(struct device_node *np) > +{ > + return -ENOSYS; > +} > + > +static inline bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np) > +{ > + return false; > +} > #endif > > #endif /* __LINUX_OF_MTD_H */ > -------------------------------->8----------------------------------- > > And then, with this little patch, we get rid of the ugly CONFIG_OF check > from the atmel_nand driver: > > --------------------------------8<----------------------------------- > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > index 0e365da..ac58098 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > @@ -1448,7 +1448,6 @@ static void atmel_nand_hwctl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int mode) > ecc_writel(host->ecc, CR, ATMEL_ECC_RST); > } > > -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) > static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, > struct device_node *np) > { > @@ -1456,7 +1455,7 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, > u32 offset[2]; > int ecc_mode; > struct atmel_nand_data *board = &host->board; > - enum of_gpio_flags flags; > + enum of_gpio_flags flags = 0; > > if (of_property_read_u32(np, "atmel,nand-addr-offset", &val) == 0) { > if (val >= 32) { > @@ -1539,13 +1538,6 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, > > return 0; > } > -#else > -static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, > - struct device_node *np) > -{ > - return -EINVAL; > -} > -#endif > > static int __init atmel_hw_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev, > struct atmel_nand_host *host) > @@ -2205,14 +2197,12 @@ static int __exit atmel_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > } > > -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) > static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_dt_ids[] = { > { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-nand" }, > { /* sentinel */ } > }; > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_dt_ids); > -#endif > > static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > @@ -2251,12 +2241,11 @@ static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > } > > -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) > -static struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { > +static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { > { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" }, > { /* sentinel */ } > }; > -#endif > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_nfc_match); > > static struct platform_driver atmel_nand_nfc_driver = { > .driver = { > -------------------------------->8----------------------------------- > > Of course, these are untested. If they look OK and don't cause any trouble, > then I'll prepare proper patches. Looks nice to me. Your proposal patch does the right thing to remove the CONFIG_OF. So please sent them out. ;) Best Regards, Josh Wu
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:02:00PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote: > Hi, Ezequiel > > On 9/1/2013 1:04 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:23:53PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 11:36 +0800, Josh Wu wrote: > >>> This patch fix following warning: > >>> > >>> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c:2007: warning: 'atmel_nand_nfc_match' defined but not used > >>> > >>> This patch add '#if defined(CONFIG_OF)' block to guard around the definition of > >>> atmel_nand_nfc_match, in order to avoid the warning when kernel is configurated > >>> as non-dt supported. > >> Ick. This driver is littered with CONFIG_OF checks. Yet I've just seen a > >> patch to pxa3xx_nand which *removes* ifdefs, on the basis that all the > >> of_match_ functions/macros will just 'do the right thing'. Can't we do > >> that here too? We might just need to add __maybe_unused? > >> > > We can. We just need to provide a few dummy functions in linux/of_mtd.h > > just like the other of_xxx() are doing. See below! > > > >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF) > >>> static struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { > >>> { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" }, > >>> { /* sentinel */ } > >>> }; > >>> +#endif > >> Also, why doesn't this one appear in a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() ? > >> > > Indeed. And why doesn't it have a "const" keyword? > > Thanks to point these out. > > > > > So, in order to remove the CONFIG_OF safely from this driver, > > and avoid any stupid warnings, we need to first implement > > these dummies: > > > > --------------------------------8<----------------------------------- > > diff --git a/include/linux/of_mtd.h b/include/linux/of_mtd.h > > index ed7f267..66f173e 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/of_mtd.h > > +++ b/include/linux/of_mtd.h > > @@ -14,6 +14,21 @@ > > int of_get_nand_ecc_mode(struct device_node *np); > > int of_get_nand_bus_width(struct device_node *np); > > bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np); > > +#else > > +static inline int of_get_nand_ecc_mode(struct device_node *np) > > +{ > > + return -ENOSYS; > > +} > > + > > +static inline int of_get_nand_bus_width(struct device_node *np) > > +{ > > + return -ENOSYS; > > +} > > + > > +static inline bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np) > > +{ > > + return false; > > +} > > #endif > > > > #endif /* __LINUX_OF_MTD_H */ > > -------------------------------->8----------------------------------- > > > > And then, with this little patch, we get rid of the ugly CONFIG_OF check > > from the atmel_nand driver: > > > > --------------------------------8<----------------------------------- > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > > index 0e365da..ac58098 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > > @@ -1448,7 +1448,6 @@ static void atmel_nand_hwctl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int mode) > > ecc_writel(host->ecc, CR, ATMEL_ECC_RST); > > } > > > > -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) > > static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, > > struct device_node *np) > > { > > @@ -1456,7 +1455,7 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, > > u32 offset[2]; > > int ecc_mode; > > struct atmel_nand_data *board = &host->board; > > - enum of_gpio_flags flags; > > + enum of_gpio_flags flags = 0; > > > > if (of_property_read_u32(np, "atmel,nand-addr-offset", &val) == 0) { > > if (val >= 32) { > > @@ -1539,13 +1538,6 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, > > > > return 0; > > } > > -#else > > -static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, > > - struct device_node *np) > > -{ > > - return -EINVAL; > > -} > > -#endif > > > > static int __init atmel_hw_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev, > > struct atmel_nand_host *host) > > @@ -2205,14 +2197,12 @@ static int __exit atmel_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return 0; > > } > > > > -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) > > static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_dt_ids[] = { > > { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-nand" }, > > { /* sentinel */ } > > }; > > > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_dt_ids); > > -#endif > > > > static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > @@ -2251,12 +2241,11 @@ static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return 0; > > } > > > > -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) > > -static struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { > > +static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { > > { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" }, > > { /* sentinel */ } > > }; > > -#endif > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_nfc_match); > > > > static struct platform_driver atmel_nand_nfc_driver = { > > .driver = { > > -------------------------------->8----------------------------------- > > > > Of course, these are untested. If they look OK and don't cause any trouble, > > then I'll prepare proper patches. > > Looks nice to me. Your proposal patch does the right thing to remove the > CONFIG_OF. Great! > So please sent them out. ;) > I'm a bit short on time these days, how about I send the first one for the stub !OF addition and on top of that you send the atmel patches?
Hi, Ezequiel On 9/3/2013 1:13 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:02:00PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote: >> Hi, Ezequiel >> >> On 9/1/2013 1:04 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:23:53PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 11:36 +0800, Josh Wu wrote: >>>>> This patch fix following warning: >>>>> >>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c:2007: warning: 'atmel_nand_nfc_match' defined but not used >>>>> >>>>> This patch add '#if defined(CONFIG_OF)' block to guard around the definition of >>>>> atmel_nand_nfc_match, in order to avoid the warning when kernel is configurated >>>>> as non-dt supported. >>>> Ick. This driver is littered with CONFIG_OF checks. Yet I've just seen a >>>> patch to pxa3xx_nand which *removes* ifdefs, on the basis that all the >>>> of_match_ functions/macros will just 'do the right thing'. Can't we do >>>> that here too? We might just need to add __maybe_unused? >>>> >>> We can. We just need to provide a few dummy functions in linux/of_mtd.h >>> just like the other of_xxx() are doing. See below! >>> >>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF) >>>>> static struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { >>>>> { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" }, >>>>> { /* sentinel */ } >>>>> }; >>>>> +#endif >>>> Also, why doesn't this one appear in a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() ? >>>> >>> Indeed. And why doesn't it have a "const" keyword? >> Thanks to point these out. >> >>> So, in order to remove the CONFIG_OF safely from this driver, >>> and avoid any stupid warnings, we need to first implement >>> these dummies: >>> >>> --------------------------------8<----------------------------------- >>> diff --git a/include/linux/of_mtd.h b/include/linux/of_mtd.h >>> index ed7f267..66f173e 100644 >>> --- a/include/linux/of_mtd.h >>> +++ b/include/linux/of_mtd.h >>> @@ -14,6 +14,21 @@ >>> int of_get_nand_ecc_mode(struct device_node *np); >>> int of_get_nand_bus_width(struct device_node *np); >>> bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np); >>> +#else >>> +static inline int of_get_nand_ecc_mode(struct device_node *np) >>> +{ >>> + return -ENOSYS; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static inline int of_get_nand_bus_width(struct device_node *np) >>> +{ >>> + return -ENOSYS; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static inline bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np) >>> +{ >>> + return false; >>> +} >>> #endif >>> >>> #endif /* __LINUX_OF_MTD_H */ >>> -------------------------------->8----------------------------------- >>> >>> And then, with this little patch, we get rid of the ugly CONFIG_OF check >>> from the atmel_nand driver: >>> >>> --------------------------------8<----------------------------------- >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c >>> index 0e365da..ac58098 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c >>> @@ -1448,7 +1448,6 @@ static void atmel_nand_hwctl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int mode) >>> ecc_writel(host->ecc, CR, ATMEL_ECC_RST); >>> } >>> >>> -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) >>> static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, >>> struct device_node *np) >>> { >>> @@ -1456,7 +1455,7 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, >>> u32 offset[2]; >>> int ecc_mode; >>> struct atmel_nand_data *board = &host->board; >>> - enum of_gpio_flags flags; >>> + enum of_gpio_flags flags = 0; >>> >>> if (of_property_read_u32(np, "atmel,nand-addr-offset", &val) == 0) { >>> if (val >= 32) { >>> @@ -1539,13 +1538,6 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, >>> >>> return 0; >>> } >>> -#else >>> -static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, >>> - struct device_node *np) >>> -{ >>> - return -EINVAL; >>> -} >>> -#endif >>> >>> static int __init atmel_hw_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev, >>> struct atmel_nand_host *host) >>> @@ -2205,14 +2197,12 @@ static int __exit atmel_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) >>> static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_dt_ids[] = { >>> { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-nand" }, >>> { /* sentinel */ } >>> }; >>> >>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_dt_ids); >>> -#endif >>> >>> static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> { >>> @@ -2251,12 +2241,11 @@ static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) >>> -static struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { >>> +static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { >>> { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" }, >>> { /* sentinel */ } >>> }; >>> -#endif >>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_nfc_match); >>> >>> static struct platform_driver atmel_nand_nfc_driver = { >>> .driver = { >>> -------------------------------->8----------------------------------- >>> >>> Of course, these are untested. If they look OK and don't cause any trouble, >>> then I'll prepare proper patches. >> Looks nice to me. Your proposal patch does the right thing to remove the >> CONFIG_OF. > Great! > >> So please sent them out. ;) >> > I'm a bit short on time these days, how about I send the first one > for the stub !OF addition and on top of that you send the atmel > patches? Okay. Best Regards, Josh Wu
diff --git a/include/linux/of_mtd.h b/include/linux/of_mtd.h index ed7f267..66f173e 100644 --- a/include/linux/of_mtd.h +++ b/include/linux/of_mtd.h @@ -14,6 +14,21 @@ int of_get_nand_ecc_mode(struct device_node *np); int of_get_nand_bus_width(struct device_node *np); bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np); +#else +static inline int of_get_nand_ecc_mode(struct device_node *np) +{ + return -ENOSYS; +} + +static inline int of_get_nand_bus_width(struct device_node *np) +{ + return -ENOSYS; +} + +static inline bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np) +{ + return false; +} #endif #endif /* __LINUX_OF_MTD_H */ -------------------------------->8----------------------------------- And then, with this little patch, we get rid of the ugly CONFIG_OF check from the atmel_nand driver: --------------------------------8<----------------------------------- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c index 0e365da..ac58098 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c @@ -1448,7 +1448,6 @@ static void atmel_nand_hwctl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int mode) ecc_writel(host->ecc, CR, ATMEL_ECC_RST); } -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, struct device_node *np) { @@ -1456,7 +1455,7 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, u32 offset[2]; int ecc_mode; struct atmel_nand_data *board = &host->board; - enum of_gpio_flags flags; + enum of_gpio_flags flags = 0; if (of_property_read_u32(np, "atmel,nand-addr-offset", &val) == 0) { if (val >= 32) { @@ -1539,13 +1538,6 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, return 0; } -#else -static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host, - struct device_node *np) -{ - return -EINVAL; -} -#endif static int __init atmel_hw_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev, struct atmel_nand_host *host) @@ -2205,14 +2197,12 @@ static int __exit atmel_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) return 0; } -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_dt_ids[] = { { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-nand" }, { /* sentinel */ } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_dt_ids); -#endif static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { @@ -2251,12 +2241,11 @@ static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return 0; } -#if defined(CONFIG_OF) -static struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { +static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = { { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" }, { /* sentinel */ } }; -#endif +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_nfc_match); static struct platform_driver atmel_nand_nfc_driver = { .driver = {