| Message ID | CACVXFVPQfUtrc4r4cS9J+6q5Z6hGZDgafH=M_6JfrzrAUGJOHw@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 12/11/13 03:22, Ming Lei wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 05:15:29PM +0000, Jonathan Austin wrote: >>> I've tested the patch below and it solves the ARM side of things - so >>> gives you an option other than a complete revert. Happy to put this in to >>> RMK's patch system if you'd prefer not to have to revert and he's happy >>> with the patch. >> >> I think this is the right solution because it then means that this symbol >> has the same meaning whether on MMU or !MMU - and getting rid of these >> kinds of gratuitous variances are the only way that !MMU is going to >> become less fragile. > > The patch only fixes problem on arm, and other !MMU&&!ARM archs > should be affected too. > > Also there is no CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET defined for some ARCHs, > such as 64bit ARCHs. > > Currently, I suggest to filter only on ARM as attachment patch if we plan > to merge Jonathan's patch, otherwise a more complicated approach has > to be figured out to do the filter(such as, define a readonly symbol in > kernel to store PAGE_OFFSET, and let scripts/kallsyms use it for > filtering). I'm happy with that approach, though allowing only ARM seems a bit conservative - is it the only architecture we actually expect to work? Jonny > > > > Thanks, > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Jonathan Austin <Jonathan.Austin@arm.com> wrote: >> Currently, I suggest to filter only on ARM as attachment patch if we plan >> to merge Jonathan's patch, otherwise a more complicated approach has >> to be figured out to do the filter(such as, define a readonly symbol in >> kernel to store PAGE_OFFSET, and let scripts/kallsyms use it for >> filtering). > > > I'm happy with that approach, though allowing only ARM seems a bit > conservative - is it the only architecture we actually expect to work? Yes, the problem is only reported on ARM, so let's do it. Thanks,
2013/11/12 Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 05:15:29PM +0000, Jonathan Austin wrote: >>> I've tested the patch below and it solves the ARM side of things - so >>> gives you an option other than a complete revert. Happy to put this in to >>> RMK's patch system if you'd prefer not to have to revert and he's happy >>> with the patch. >> >> I think this is the right solution because it then means that this symbol >> has the same meaning whether on MMU or !MMU - and getting rid of these >> kinds of gratuitous variances are the only way that !MMU is going to >> become less fragile. > > The patch only fixes problem on arm, and other !MMU&&!ARM archs > should be affected too. > > Also there is no CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET defined for some ARCHs, > such as 64bit ARCHs. > > Currently, I suggest to filter only on ARM as attachment patch if we plan > to merge Jonathan's patch, otherwise a more complicated approach has > to be figured out to do the filter(such as, define a readonly symbol in > kernel to store PAGE_OFFSET, and let scripts/kallsyms use it for > filtering). Hi Ming, You missed "; then" in the end of if statement in your patch. So I got below error with your patch: scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: line 87: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' make: *** [vmlinuxclean] Error 2 Regards, Axel
Hi Axel, On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> wrote: > > Hi Ming, > You missed "; then" in the end of if statement in your patch. > > So I got below error with your patch: > scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: line 87: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' > make: *** [vmlinuxclean] Error 2 Thanks for your test, and I have fixed it and post a formal one for merge, and you can find these two patches on arm list, but forget to Cc you, sorry for that. Thanks,
2013/11/13 Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>: > Hi Axel, > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Ming, >> You missed "; then" in the end of if statement in your patch. >> >> So I got below error with your patch: >> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: line 87: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' >> make: *** [vmlinuxclean] Error 2 > > Thanks for your test, and I have fixed it and post a formal one for merge, > and you can find these two patches on arm list, but forget to Cc you, sorry > for that. Hi Ming, Both your patch and Jonathan's patch are still not in linux-next. Any chance to resend the patchs to RMK's patch system? Thanks, Axel
Hi Axel, I am fine to resend it to RMK's patch system, but I am not sure if Russell would like to host it. Maybe it is better to push it via Rusty's tree since the change is only on scripts/, and it doesn't depend on the 1st one. Rusty, could you pick up the patch with title of "scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: only filter kernel symbols for arm"? Thanks, -- Ming Lei On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> wrote: > 2013/11/13 Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>: >> Hi Axel, >> >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ming, >>> You missed "; then" in the end of if statement in your patch. >>> >>> So I got below error with your patch: >>> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: line 87: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' >>> make: *** [vmlinuxclean] Error 2 >> >> Thanks for your test, and I have fixed it and post a formal one for merge, >> and you can find these two patches on arm list, but forget to Cc you, sorry >> for that. > > Hi Ming, > Both your patch and Jonathan's patch are still not in linux-next. > Any chance to resend the patchs to RMK's patch system? > > Thanks, > Axel
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Axel, > > I am fine to resend it to RMK's patch system, but I am not sure > if Russell would like to host it. > > Maybe it is better to push it via Rusty's tree since the change is only > on scripts/, and it doesn't depend on the 1st one. > > Rusty, could you pick up the patch with title of > "scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: only filter kernel symbols for arm"? OK, and I added the correct Fixes: line so the stable people can track it properly: Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Fixes: f6537f2f0eba4eba3354e48dbe3047db6d8b6254 Singed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> BTW, you misspelled Signed-off-by :) Applied, Rusty. > > Thanks, > -- > Ming Lei > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> wrote: >> 2013/11/13 Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>: >>> Hi Axel, >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Ming, >>>> You missed "; then" in the end of if statement in your patch. >>>> >>>> So I got below error with your patch: >>>> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: line 87: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' >>>> make: *** [vmlinuxclean] Error 2 >>> >>> Thanks for your test, and I have fixed it and post a formal one for merge, >>> and you can find these two patches on arm list, but forget to Cc you, sorry >>> for that. >> >> Hi Ming, >> Both your patch and Jonathan's patch are still not in linux-next. >> Any chance to resend the patchs to RMK's patch system? >> >> Thanks, >> Axel > > > > -- > Ming Lei
diff --git a/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh b/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh index 32b10f5..2dca94a 100644 --- a/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh +++ b/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh @@ -82,7 +82,9 @@ kallsyms() kallsymopt="${kallsymopt} --all-symbols" fi - kallsymopt="${kallsymopt} --page-offset=$CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET" + if [ -n "${CONFIG_ARM}" ] + kallsymopt="${kallsymopt} --page-offset=$CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET" + fi local aflags="${KBUILD_AFLAGS} ${KBUILD_AFLAGS_KERNEL} \ ${NOSTDINC_FLAGS} ${LINUXINCLUDE} ${KBUILD_CPPFLAGS}"