Message ID | 8065346.ZtkoVh8DW8@vostro.rjw.lan (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 02:02 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 05:33:28 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 01:27 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 05:00:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 01:09 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > The following series of four patches (on top of current linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge) > > > > > rework child device lookup in drivers/acpi/glue.c and related things: > > > > > > > > > > [1/4] ACPI / bind: Simplify child device lookup > > > > > [2/4] PCI/ ACPI: Use acpi_find_child_device() for child device lookup > > > > > [3/4] ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_get_child() > > > > > [4/4] ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_preset_companion() > > > > > > > > This patchset caused the attached panic during boot on a system. > > > > acpi_pci_find_device() called acpi_find_child_device() with > > > > ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent) being a NULL pointer when scanning bus 0xf. > > > > > > > > This bus 0xf seems to be a chipset internal bus, which is not intended > > > > for the OS to use. Therefore, ACPI does not list its PCI bridge device. > > > > > > > > # lspci -tv > > > > : > > > > +-[0000:0f]-+-08.0 Intel Corporation Ivytown QPI Link 0 > > > > | +-08.2 Intel Corporation Ivytown QPI Link 0 > > > > : > > > > > > > > However, pcibios_fixup_peer_bridges(), called from pci_subsys_init(), > > > > finds this bus as it scans all the buses from 0 to pcibios_last_bus. > > > > Hence, this dev->parent does not have an associated ACPI device object. > > > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > > > I've dropped the patches from bleeding-edge for now. > > > > > > Does "[1/4] ACPI / bind: Simplify child device lookup" alone work on that > > > system? > > > > Yes, the system boots fine with 1/4 alone. > > Thanks! > > Can you please check if the following modified [2/4] also works on top of it? Yes, it works fine. Thanks for the quick fix! -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 06:11:57 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 02:02 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 05:33:28 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 01:27 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 05:00:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 01:09 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > The following series of four patches (on top of current linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge) > > > > > > rework child device lookup in drivers/acpi/glue.c and related things: > > > > > > > > > > > > [1/4] ACPI / bind: Simplify child device lookup > > > > > > [2/4] PCI/ ACPI: Use acpi_find_child_device() for child device lookup > > > > > > [3/4] ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_get_child() > > > > > > [4/4] ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_preset_companion() > > > > > > > > > > This patchset caused the attached panic during boot on a system. > > > > > acpi_pci_find_device() called acpi_find_child_device() with > > > > > ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent) being a NULL pointer when scanning bus 0xf. > > > > > > > > > > This bus 0xf seems to be a chipset internal bus, which is not intended > > > > > for the OS to use. Therefore, ACPI does not list its PCI bridge device. > > > > > > > > > > # lspci -tv > > > > > : > > > > > +-[0000:0f]-+-08.0 Intel Corporation Ivytown QPI Link 0 > > > > > | +-08.2 Intel Corporation Ivytown QPI Link 0 > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > However, pcibios_fixup_peer_bridges(), called from pci_subsys_init(), > > > > > finds this bus as it scans all the buses from 0 to pcibios_last_bus. > > > > > Hence, this dev->parent does not have an associated ACPI device object. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > > > > > I've dropped the patches from bleeding-edge for now. > > > > > > > > Does "[1/4] ACPI / bind: Simplify child device lookup" alone work on that > > > > system? > > > > > > Yes, the system boots fine with 1/4 alone. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Can you please check if the following modified [2/4] also works on top of it? > > Yes, it works fine. > > Thanks for the quick fix! No problem. :-) [3/4] and [4/4] on top of this one should work too. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 02:32 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 06:11:57 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 02:02 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 05:33:28 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 01:27 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 05:00:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 01:09 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The following series of four patches (on top of current linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge) > > > > > > > rework child device lookup in drivers/acpi/glue.c and related things: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1/4] ACPI / bind: Simplify child device lookup > > > > > > > [2/4] PCI/ ACPI: Use acpi_find_child_device() for child device lookup > > > > > > > [3/4] ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_get_child() > > > > > > > [4/4] ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_preset_companion() > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset caused the attached panic during boot on a system. > > > > > > acpi_pci_find_device() called acpi_find_child_device() with > > > > > > ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent) being a NULL pointer when scanning bus 0xf. > > > > > > > > > > > > This bus 0xf seems to be a chipset internal bus, which is not intended > > > > > > for the OS to use. Therefore, ACPI does not list its PCI bridge device. > > > > > > > > > > > > # lspci -tv > > > > > > : > > > > > > +-[0000:0f]-+-08.0 Intel Corporation Ivytown QPI Link 0 > > > > > > | +-08.2 Intel Corporation Ivytown QPI Link 0 > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > However, pcibios_fixup_peer_bridges(), called from pci_subsys_init(), > > > > > > finds this bus as it scans all the buses from 0 to pcibios_last_bus. > > > > > > Hence, this dev->parent does not have an associated ACPI device object. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > > > > > > > I've dropped the patches from bleeding-edge for now. > > > > > > > > > > Does "[1/4] ACPI / bind: Simplify child device lookup" alone work on that > > > > > system? > > > > > > > > Yes, the system boots fine with 1/4 alone. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Can you please check if the following modified [2/4] also works on top of it? > > > > Yes, it works fine. > > > > Thanks for the quick fix! > > No problem. :-) > > [3/4] and [4/4] on top of this one should work too. Yes, the system booted fine with 3/4 & 4/4. :-) Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 06:40:28 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 02:32 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 06:11:57 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 02:02 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 05:33:28 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 01:27 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 05:00:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 01:09 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The following series of four patches (on top of current linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge) > > > > > > > > rework child device lookup in drivers/acpi/glue.c and related things: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1/4] ACPI / bind: Simplify child device lookup > > > > > > > > [2/4] PCI/ ACPI: Use acpi_find_child_device() for child device lookup > > > > > > > > [3/4] ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_get_child() > > > > > > > > [4/4] ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_preset_companion() > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset caused the attached panic during boot on a system. > > > > > > > acpi_pci_find_device() called acpi_find_child_device() with > > > > > > > ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent) being a NULL pointer when scanning bus 0xf. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This bus 0xf seems to be a chipset internal bus, which is not intended > > > > > > > for the OS to use. Therefore, ACPI does not list its PCI bridge device. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > # lspci -tv > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > +-[0000:0f]-+-08.0 Intel Corporation Ivytown QPI Link 0 > > > > > > > | +-08.2 Intel Corporation Ivytown QPI Link 0 > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, pcibios_fixup_peer_bridges(), called from pci_subsys_init(), > > > > > > > finds this bus as it scans all the buses from 0 to pcibios_last_bus. > > > > > > > Hence, this dev->parent does not have an associated ACPI device object. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > > > > > > > > > I've dropped the patches from bleeding-edge for now. > > > > > > > > > > > > Does "[1/4] ACPI / bind: Simplify child device lookup" alone work on that > > > > > > system? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the system boots fine with 1/4 alone. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Can you please check if the following modified [2/4] also works on top of it? > > > > > > Yes, it works fine. > > > > > > Thanks for the quick fix! > > > > No problem. :-) > > > > [3/4] and [4/4] on top of this one should work too. > > Yes, the system booted fine with 3/4 & 4/4. :-) Thanks for the verification! Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c @@ -309,7 +309,8 @@ void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus static int acpi_pci_find_device(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle) { struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev); - bool is_bridge; + struct acpi_device *adev; + bool check_children; u64 addr; /* @@ -317,14 +318,17 @@ static int acpi_pci_find_device(struct d * is set only after acpi_pci_find_device() has been called for the * given device. */ - is_bridge = pci_dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE + check_children = pci_dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE || pci_dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS; /* Please ref to ACPI spec for the syntax of _ADR */ addr = (PCI_SLOT(pci_dev->devfn) << 16) | PCI_FUNC(pci_dev->devfn); - *handle = acpi_find_child(ACPI_HANDLE(dev->parent), addr, is_bridge); - if (!*handle) - return -ENODEV; - return 0; + adev = acpi_find_child_device(ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent), addr, + check_children); + if (adev) { + *handle = adev->handle; + return 0; + } + return -ENODEV; } static void pci_acpi_setup(struct device *dev) Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/glue.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/glue.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/glue.c @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ struct acpi_device *acpi_find_child_devi struct acpi_device *adev, *ret = NULL; int ret_score = 0; + if (!parent) + return NULL; + list_for_each_entry(adev, &parent->children, node) { unsigned long long addr; acpi_status status;