| Message ID | 1382524894-15164-3-git-send-email-Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 06:41:25PM +0800, Minghuan Lian wrote: > The patch adds PCI indirect read/write functions. The main code > is ported from arch/powerpc/sysdev/indirect_pci.c. We use general > IO API iowrite32be/ioread32be instead of out_be32/in_be32, and > use structure fsl_Pci instead of PowerPC's pci_controller. > The patch also provides fsl_pcie_check_link() to check PCI link. > The weak function fsl_arch_pci_exclude_device() is provided to > call ppc_md.pci_exclude_device() for PowerPC architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> > > --- > change log: > v1-v3: > Derived from http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278965/ > > Based on upstream master. > Based on the discussion of RFC version here > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/274487/ > > drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h | 6 ++ > 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c > index 69d338b..8bc9a64 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c > @@ -35,52 +35,173 @@ > #include <sysdev/fsl_soc.h> > #include <sysdev/fsl_pci.h> > > -static int fsl_pcie_check_link(struct pci_controller *hose) > +/* Indirect type */ > +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_EXT_REG 0x00000002 > +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_SURPRESS_PRIMARY_BUS 0x00000004 > +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK 0x00000008 > +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_BIG_ENDIAN 0x00000010 > +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_FSL_CFG_REG_LINK 0x00000040 Why are these here rather than in the header, given that you have indirect_type in the struct in the header? > +int __weak fsl_arch_pci_exclude_device(struct fsl_pci *pci, u8 bus, u8 devfn) > +{ > + return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL; > +} > + > +static int fsl_pci_read_config(struct fsl_pci *pci, int bus, int devfn, > + int offset, int len, u32 *val) > +{ > + u32 bus_no, reg, data; > + > + if (pci->indirect_type & INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK) { > + if (bus != pci->first_busno) > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > + if (devfn != 0) > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > + } A lot of this seems duplicated from arch/powerpc/sysdev/indirect_pci.c. How generally applicable is that file to non-PPC implementations? At a minimum I see a similar file in arch/microblaze. It should probably eventually be moved to common code, rather than duplicated again. A prerequisite for that would be making common the dependencies it has on the rest of what is currently arch PCI infrastructure; until then, it's probably better to just have the common fsl-pci code know how to interface with the appropriate PPC/ARM code rather than trying to copy the infrastructure as well. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
HI Scott, please see my comments inline. On 01/04/2014 06:33 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 06:41:25PM +0800, Minghuan Lian wrote: >> The patch adds PCI indirect read/write functions. The main code >> is ported from arch/powerpc/sysdev/indirect_pci.c. We use general >> IO API iowrite32be/ioread32be instead of out_be32/in_be32, and >> use structure fsl_Pci instead of PowerPC's pci_controller. >> The patch also provides fsl_pcie_check_link() to check PCI link. >> The weak function fsl_arch_pci_exclude_device() is provided to >> call ppc_md.pci_exclude_device() for PowerPC architecture. >> >> Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> >> >> --- >> change log: >> v1-v3: >> Derived from http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278965/ >> >> Based on upstream master. >> Based on the discussion of RFC version here >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/274487/ >> >> drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h | 6 ++ >> 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c >> index 69d338b..8bc9a64 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c >> @@ -35,52 +35,173 @@ >> #include <sysdev/fsl_soc.h> >> #include <sysdev/fsl_pci.h> >> >> -static int fsl_pcie_check_link(struct pci_controller *hose) >> +/* Indirect type */ >> +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_EXT_REG 0x00000002 >> +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_SURPRESS_PRIMARY_BUS 0x00000004 >> +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK 0x00000008 >> +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_BIG_ENDIAN 0x00000010 >> +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_FSL_CFG_REG_LINK 0x00000040 > Why are these here rather than in the header, given that you have > indirect_type in the struct in the header? [Minghuan] It's better to define the type in the header file. I will fix it. > >> +int __weak fsl_arch_pci_exclude_device(struct fsl_pci *pci, u8 bus, u8 devfn) >> +{ >> + return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL; >> +} >> + >> +static int fsl_pci_read_config(struct fsl_pci *pci, int bus, int devfn, >> + int offset, int len, u32 *val) >> +{ >> + u32 bus_no, reg, data; >> + >> + if (pci->indirect_type & INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK) { >> + if (bus != pci->first_busno) >> + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; >> + if (devfn != 0) >> + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; >> + } > A lot of this seems duplicated from arch/powerpc/sysdev/indirect_pci.c. > > How generally applicable is that file to non-PPC implementations? At a > minimum I see a similar file in arch/microblaze. It should probably > eventually be moved to common code, rather than duplicated again. A > prerequisite for that would be making common the dependencies it has on > the rest of what is currently arch PCI infrastructure; until then, it's > probably better to just have the common fsl-pci code know how to > interface with the appropriate PPC/ARM code rather than trying to copy > the infrastructure as well. [Minghuan] Yes, This is a duplicate except it uses struct fsl_pci. But it is hard to be move to common code. because every indirect read/write functions use different PCI controller structure which is very basic structure and ARM has no this structure. If we can not establish a unified pci controller structure, we can only abstract out a simple structure which includes indirect access related fields, and need a callback function to get the pointer like this: ((powerpc/microblaze/mips/ pci_controller *)(pci_bus->sysdata))->indirect_struct. Should we provide the common code for indirect access API or wait for the common PCI controller structure? > -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 13:36 +0800, Lian Minghuan-b31939 wrote: > HI Scott, > > please see my comments inline. > > On 01/04/2014 06:33 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > > A lot of this seems duplicated from arch/powerpc/sysdev/indirect_pci.c. > > > > How generally applicable is that file to non-PPC implementations? At a > > minimum I see a similar file in arch/microblaze. It should probably > > eventually be moved to common code, rather than duplicated again. A > > prerequisite for that would be making common the dependencies it has on > > the rest of what is currently arch PCI infrastructure; until then, it's > > probably better to just have the common fsl-pci code know how to > > interface with the appropriate PPC/ARM code rather than trying to copy > > the infrastructure as well. > [Minghuan] Yes, This is a duplicate except it uses struct fsl_pci. But > it is hard to be move to common code. > because every indirect read/write functions use different PCI controller > structure which is very basic structure and ARM has no this structure. > If we can not establish a unified pci controller structure, we can only > abstract out a simple structure which includes indirect access related > fields, > and need a callback function to get the pointer like this: > ((powerpc/microblaze/mips/ pci_controller > *)(pci_bus->sysdata))->indirect_struct. > Should we provide the common code for indirect access API or wait for > the common PCI controller structure? Either work with the PCI maintainer to come up with a common structure, or leave the code where it is and call into it. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c index 69d338b..8bc9a64 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c @@ -35,52 +35,173 @@ #include <sysdev/fsl_soc.h> #include <sysdev/fsl_pci.h> -static int fsl_pcie_check_link(struct pci_controller *hose) +/* Indirect type */ +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_EXT_REG 0x00000002 +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_SURPRESS_PRIMARY_BUS 0x00000004 +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK 0x00000008 +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_BIG_ENDIAN 0x00000010 +#define INDIRECT_TYPE_FSL_CFG_REG_LINK 0x00000040 + +int __weak fsl_arch_pci_exclude_device(struct fsl_pci *pci, u8 bus, u8 devfn) +{ + return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL; +} + +static int fsl_pci_read_config(struct fsl_pci *pci, int bus, int devfn, + int offset, int len, u32 *val) +{ + u32 bus_no, reg, data; + + if (pci->indirect_type & INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK) { + if (bus != pci->first_busno) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + if (devfn != 0) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + } + + if (fsl_arch_pci_exclude_device(pci, bus, devfn)) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + + bus_no = (bus == pci->first_busno) ? pci->self_busno : bus; + + if (pci->indirect_type & INDIRECT_TYPE_EXT_REG) + reg = ((offset & 0xf00) << 16) | (offset & 0xfc); + else + reg = offset & 0xfc; + + if (pci->indirect_type & INDIRECT_TYPE_BIG_ENDIAN) + iowrite32be(0x80000000 | (bus_no << 16) | (devfn << 8) | reg, + &pci->regs->config_addr); + else + iowrite32(0x80000000 | (bus_no << 16) | (devfn << 8) | reg, + &pci->regs->config_addr); + + /* + * Note: the caller has already checked that offset is + * suitably aligned and that len is 1, 2 or 4. + */ + data = ioread32(&pci->regs->config_data); + switch (len) { + case 1: + *val = (data >> (8 * (offset & 3))) & 0xff; + break; + case 2: + *val = (data >> (8 * (offset & 3))) & 0xffff; + break; + default: + *val = data; + break; + } + + return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL; +} + +static int fsl_pci_write_config(struct fsl_pci *pci, int bus, int devfn, + int offset, int len, u32 val) +{ + void __iomem *cfg_data; + u32 bus_no, reg; + + if (pci->indirect_type & INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK) { + if (bus != pci->first_busno) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + if (devfn != 0) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + } + + if (fsl_arch_pci_exclude_device(pci, bus, devfn)) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + + bus_no = (bus == pci->first_busno) ? + pci->self_busno : bus; + + if (pci->indirect_type & INDIRECT_TYPE_EXT_REG) + reg = ((offset & 0xf00) << 16) | (offset & 0xfc); + else + reg = offset & 0xfc; + + if (pci->indirect_type & INDIRECT_TYPE_BIG_ENDIAN) + iowrite32be(0x80000000 | (bus_no << 16) | (devfn << 8) | reg, + &pci->regs->config_addr); + else + iowrite32(0x80000000 | (bus_no << 16) | (devfn << 8) | reg, + &pci->regs->config_addr); + + /* suppress setting of PCI_PRIMARY_BUS */ + if (pci->indirect_type & INDIRECT_TYPE_SURPRESS_PRIMARY_BUS) + if ((offset == PCI_PRIMARY_BUS) && + (bus == pci->first_busno)) + val &= 0xffffff00; + + /* + * Note: the caller has already checked that offset is + * suitably aligned and that len is 1, 2 or 4. + */ + cfg_data = ((void *) &(pci->regs->config_data)) + (offset & 3); + switch (len) { + case 1: + iowrite8(val, cfg_data); + break; + case 2: + iowrite16(val, cfg_data); + break; + default: + iowrite32(val, cfg_data); + break; + } + return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL; +} + +bool fsl_pci_check_link(struct fsl_pci *pci) { u32 val = 0; - if (hose->indirect_type & PPC_INDIRECT_TYPE_FSL_CFG_REG_LINK) { - if (hose->ops->read == fsl_indirect_read_config) { - struct pci_bus bus; - bus.number = hose->first_busno; - bus.sysdata = hose; - bus.ops = hose->ops; - indirect_read_config(&bus, 0, PCIE_LTSSM, 4, &val); - } else - early_read_config_dword(hose, 0, 0, PCIE_LTSSM, &val); + if (pci->indirect_type & INDIRECT_TYPE_FSL_CFG_REG_LINK) { + fsl_pci_read_config(pci, 0, 0, PCIE_LTSSM, 4, &val); if (val < PCIE_LTSSM_L0) - return 1; + return false; } else { - struct ccsr_pci __iomem *pci = hose->private_data; /* for PCIe IP rev 3.0 or greater use CSR0 for link state */ - val = (in_be32(&pci->pex_csr0) & PEX_CSR0_LTSSM_MASK) + val = (ioread32be(&pci->regs->pex_csr0) & PEX_CSR0_LTSSM_MASK) >> PEX_CSR0_LTSSM_SHIFT; if (val != PEX_CSR0_LTSSM_L0) - return 1; + return false; } - return 0; + return true; } static int fsl_indirect_read_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int offset, int len, u32 *val) { - struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus); + struct fsl_pci *pci = fsl_arch_sys_to_pci(bus->sysdata); + + if (!pci) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; - if (fsl_pcie_check_link(hose)) - hose->indirect_type |= PPC_INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK; + if (fsl_pci_check_link(pci)) + pci->indirect_type &= ~INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK; else - hose->indirect_type &= ~PPC_INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK; + pci->indirect_type |= INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK; - return indirect_read_config(bus, devfn, offset, len, val); + return fsl_pci_read_config(pci, bus->number, devfn, offset, len, val); } -#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_SOC_BOOKE) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_86xx) - -static struct pci_ops fsl_indirect_pcie_ops = +static int fsl_indirect_write_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, + int offset, int len, u32 val) { + struct fsl_pci *pci = fsl_arch_sys_to_pci(bus->sysdata); + + if (!pci) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + + return fsl_pci_write_config(pci, bus->number, devfn, + offset, len, val); +} + +static struct pci_ops fsl_indirect_pci_ops = { .read = fsl_indirect_read_config, - .write = indirect_write_config, + .write = fsl_indirect_write_config, }; static int setup_one_atmu(struct ccsr_pci __iomem *pci, diff --git a/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h b/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h index e56a040..7df4355 100644 --- a/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h +++ b/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h @@ -143,5 +143,11 @@ struct fsl_pci { */ extern struct fsl_pci *fsl_arch_sys_to_pci(void *sys); +/* Return link status true -> link, false -> no link */ +bool fsl_pci_check_link(struct fsl_pci *pci); + +/* To avoid touching specified devices */ +int fsl_arch_pci_exclude_device(struct fsl_pci *pci, u8 bus, u8 devfn); + #endif /* __PCI_COMMON_H */ #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
The patch adds PCI indirect read/write functions. The main code is ported from arch/powerpc/sysdev/indirect_pci.c. We use general IO API iowrite32be/ioread32be instead of out_be32/in_be32, and use structure fsl_Pci instead of PowerPC's pci_controller. The patch also provides fsl_pcie_check_link() to check PCI link. The weak function fsl_arch_pci_exclude_device() is provided to call ppc_md.pci_exclude_device() for PowerPC architecture. Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> --- change log: v1-v3: Derived from http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278965/ Based on upstream master. Based on the discussion of RFC version here http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/274487/ drivers/pci/host/pci-fsl-common.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)