| Message ID | 1389099548-14649-3-git-send-email-rahul.sharma@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 18:29:00 Rahul Sharma wrote: > From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> > > This patch add basic arch side support for exynos5260 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com> > --- > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > index 09e6898..e0c7108 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static const char name_exynos4210[] = "EXYNOS4210"; > static const char name_exynos4212[] = "EXYNOS4212"; > static const char name_exynos4412[] = "EXYNOS4412"; > static const char name_exynos5250[] = "EXYNOS5250"; > +static const char name_exynos5260[] = "EXYNOS5260"; > static const char name_exynos5410[] = "EXYNOS5410"; > static const char name_exynos5420[] = "EXYNOS5420"; > static const char name_exynos5440[] = "EXYNOS5440"; > @@ -92,6 +93,12 @@ static struct cpu_table cpu_ids[] __initdata = { > .init = exynos_init, > .name = name_exynos5410, > }, { > + .idcode = EXYNOS5260_SOC_ID, > + .idmask = EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK, > + .map_io = exynos5_map_io, > + .init = exynos_init, > + .name = name_exynos5260, > + }, { > .idcode = EXYNOS5420_SOC_ID, > .idmask = EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK, > .map_io = exynos5_map_io, I think we've seen enough of these. Please generalize it enough so we won't need to add any more entries whenever a new SoC comes up. It's probably fine for now to have to tell the difference between EXYNOS4 and EXYNOS5, but not new chips within some family. According to rumors on the web, EXYNOS6 is going to be released soon with a 64-bit CPU in it, and since we don't allow platform specific code for arm64 like this any more, you should just drop it for arm32 as well. > @@ -279,6 +286,15 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = { > }, > }; > > +static struct map_desc exynos5260_iodesc[] __initdata = { > + { > + .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS, > + .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS5260_PA_SYSRAM_NS), > + .length = SZ_4K, > + .type = MT_DEVICE, > + }, > +}; > + > void exynos4_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) > { > __raw_writel(0x1, S5P_SWRESET); The only difference you have is the map descriptor, and that should go away if you only add a proper DT binding for SYSRAM. Try to get rid of the remaining map_desc entries while you're at it. > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h > index 31cac97..13c802b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > > #define S5P_VA_SYSRAM S3C_ADDR(0x02400000) > #define S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS S3C_ADDR(0x02410000) > + > #define S5P_VA_DMC0 S3C_ADDR(0x02440000) > #define S5P_VA_DMC1 S3C_ADDR(0x02480000) > #define S5P_VA_SROMC S3C_ADDR(0x024C0000) > This hunk doesn't really belong in the patch at all. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Thanks Arnd, On 7 January 2014 18:54, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Tuesday 07 January 2014 18:29:00 Rahul Sharma wrote: >> From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> >> >> This patch add basic arch side support for exynos5260 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com> >> --- >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c >> index 09e6898..e0c7108 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c >> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static const char name_exynos4210[] = "EXYNOS4210"; >> static const char name_exynos4212[] = "EXYNOS4212"; >> static const char name_exynos4412[] = "EXYNOS4412"; >> static const char name_exynos5250[] = "EXYNOS5250"; >> +static const char name_exynos5260[] = "EXYNOS5260"; >> static const char name_exynos5410[] = "EXYNOS5410"; >> static const char name_exynos5420[] = "EXYNOS5420"; >> static const char name_exynos5440[] = "EXYNOS5440"; >> @@ -92,6 +93,12 @@ static struct cpu_table cpu_ids[] __initdata = { >> .init = exynos_init, >> .name = name_exynos5410, >> }, { >> + .idcode = EXYNOS5260_SOC_ID, >> + .idmask = EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK, >> + .map_io = exynos5_map_io, >> + .init = exynos_init, >> + .name = name_exynos5260, >> + }, { >> .idcode = EXYNOS5420_SOC_ID, >> .idmask = EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK, >> .map_io = exynos5_map_io, > > I think we've seen enough of these. Please generalize it enough > so we won't need to add any more entries whenever a new SoC > comes up. It's probably fine for now to have to tell the difference > between EXYNOS4 and EXYNOS5, but not new chips within some family. > > According to rumors on the web, EXYNOS6 is going to be released > soon with a 64-bit CPU in it, and since we don't allow platform > specific code for arm64 like this any more, you should just > drop it for arm32 as well. I agree with you. Let me explore options to optimize this part of the code. I prefer to add code here (along with legacy ) to accept DT bindings for Exynos5 family SoCs and use them for Exynos5260. Next, I will migrate the rest of the existing platforms and get rid of existing platform code. > >> @@ -279,6 +286,15 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = { >> }, >> }; >> >> +static struct map_desc exynos5260_iodesc[] __initdata = { >> + { >> + .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS, >> + .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS5260_PA_SYSRAM_NS), >> + .length = SZ_4K, >> + .type = MT_DEVICE, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> void exynos4_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) >> { >> __raw_writel(0x1, S5P_SWRESET); > > The only difference you have is the map descriptor, and that should > go away if you only add a proper DT binding for SYSRAM. Try to get > rid of the remaining map_desc entries while you're at it. > Ok. let me check this. >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h >> index 31cac97..13c802b 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h >> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ >> >> #define S5P_VA_SYSRAM S3C_ADDR(0x02400000) >> #define S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS S3C_ADDR(0x02410000) >> + >> #define S5P_VA_DMC0 S3C_ADDR(0x02440000) >> #define S5P_VA_DMC1 S3C_ADDR(0x02480000) >> #define S5P_VA_SROMC S3C_ADDR(0x024C0000) >> > > This hunk doesn't really belong in the patch at all. I will move it to correct patch. Regards, Rahul Sharma > > Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig index 35c335d..60cbf03 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig @@ -101,6 +101,15 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5410 help Enable EXYNOS5410 SoC support +config SOC_EXYNOS5260 + bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5260" + default y + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5 + select AUTO_ZRELADDR + select SAMSUNG_DMADEV + help + Enable EXYNOS5260 SoC support + config SOC_EXYNOS5420 bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5420" default y diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c index 09e6898..e0c7108 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static const char name_exynos4210[] = "EXYNOS4210"; static const char name_exynos4212[] = "EXYNOS4212"; static const char name_exynos4412[] = "EXYNOS4412"; static const char name_exynos5250[] = "EXYNOS5250"; +static const char name_exynos5260[] = "EXYNOS5260"; static const char name_exynos5410[] = "EXYNOS5410"; static const char name_exynos5420[] = "EXYNOS5420"; static const char name_exynos5440[] = "EXYNOS5440"; @@ -92,6 +93,12 @@ static struct cpu_table cpu_ids[] __initdata = { .init = exynos_init, .name = name_exynos5410, }, { + .idcode = EXYNOS5260_SOC_ID, + .idmask = EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK, + .map_io = exynos5_map_io, + .init = exynos_init, + .name = name_exynos5260, + }, { .idcode = EXYNOS5420_SOC_ID, .idmask = EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK, .map_io = exynos5_map_io, @@ -279,6 +286,15 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = { }, }; +static struct map_desc exynos5260_iodesc[] __initdata = { + { + .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS, + .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS5260_PA_SYSRAM_NS), + .length = SZ_4K, + .type = MT_DEVICE, + }, +}; + void exynos4_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) { __raw_writel(0x1, S5P_SWRESET); @@ -387,9 +403,10 @@ static void __init exynos4_map_io(void) static void __init exynos5_map_io(void) { iotable_init(exynos5_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_iodesc)); - if (soc_is_exynos5250()) iotable_init(exynos5250_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_iodesc)); + if (soc_is_exynos5260()) + iotable_init(exynos5260_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5260_iodesc)); if (soc_is_exynos5410()) iotable_init(exynos5410_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5410_iodesc)); } diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h index 894f431..188bb78 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ #define EXYNOS4x12_PA_SYSRAM_NS 0x0204F000 #define EXYNOS5250_PA_SYSRAM_NS 0x0204F000 #define EXYNOS5410_PA_SYSRAM_NS 0x02073000 +#define EXYNOS5260_PA_SYSRAM_NS 0x02073000 #define EXYNOS_PA_CHIPID 0x10000000 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c index 9bb6eac..7d3838a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static void __init exynos5_dt_machine_init(void) static char const *exynos5_dt_compat[] __initdata = { "samsung,exynos5250", + "samsung,exynos5260", "samsung,exynos5410", "samsung,exynos5420", "samsung,exynos5440", diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h index 8f09488..4daa9b3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ extern unsigned long samsung_cpu_id; #define EXYNOS4_CPU_MASK 0xFFFE0000 #define EXYNOS5250_SOC_ID 0x43520000 +#define EXYNOS5260_SOC_ID 0xE5260000 #define EXYNOS5410_SOC_ID 0xE5410000 #define EXYNOS5420_SOC_ID 0xE5420000 #define EXYNOS5440_SOC_ID 0xE5440000 @@ -69,6 +70,7 @@ IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos4210, EXYNOS4210_CPU_ID, EXYNOS4_CPU_MASK) IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos4212, EXYNOS4212_CPU_ID, EXYNOS4_CPU_MASK) IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos4412, EXYNOS4412_CPU_ID, EXYNOS4_CPU_MASK) IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5250, EXYNOS5250_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK) +IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5260, EXYNOS5260_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK) IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5410, EXYNOS5410_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK) IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5420, EXYNOS5420_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK) IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5440, EXYNOS5440_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK) @@ -156,6 +158,12 @@ IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5440, EXYNOS5440_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK) # define soc_is_exynos5410() 0 #endif +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260) +# define soc_is_exynos5260() is_samsung_exynos5260() +#else +# define soc_is_exynos5260() 0 +#endif + #if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420) # define soc_is_exynos5420() is_samsung_exynos5420() #else diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h index 31cac97..13c802b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #define S5P_VA_SYSRAM S3C_ADDR(0x02400000) #define S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS S3C_ADDR(0x02410000) + #define S5P_VA_DMC0 S3C_ADDR(0x02440000) #define S5P_VA_DMC1 S3C_ADDR(0x02480000) #define S5P_VA_SROMC S3C_ADDR(0x024C0000)