| Message ID | 1387815579-15677-3-git-send-email-taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 18:19 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: > From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> > > Ensure we read instructions in the correct endian-ness by using > the <asm/opcodes.h> helper to transform them as necessary. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> > [taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org: fix next_instruction() function] > Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org> > --- Apart from the spurious line removal (see below) then: Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org> and you can include an ACK for the other patches in this series too. Thanks. > arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c > index 0cd63d0..96e3dbc 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c > @@ -1329,7 +1329,8 @@ static void test_case_failed(const char *message) > static unsigned long next_instruction(unsigned long pc) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL > - if ((pc & 1) && !is_wide_instruction(*(u16 *)(pc - 1))) > + if ((pc & 1) && > + !is_wide_instruction(__mem_to_opcode_thumb16(*(u16 *)(pc - 1)))) > return pc + 2; > else > #endif > @@ -1374,13 +1375,13 @@ static uintptr_t __used kprobes_test_case_start(const char *title, void *stack) > > if (test_case_is_thumb) { > u16 *p = (u16 *)(test_code & ~1); > - current_instruction = p[0]; > + current_instruction = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(p[0]); > if (is_wide_instruction(current_instruction)) { > - current_instruction <<= 16; > - current_instruction |= p[1]; > + u16 instr2 = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(p[1]); > + current_instruction = __opcode_thumb32_compose(current_instruction, instr2); > } > } else { > - current_instruction = *(u32 *)test_code; > + current_instruction = __mem_to_opcode_arm(*(u32 *)test_code); > } > > if (current_title[0] == '.') > @@ -1593,7 +1594,6 @@ static int run_test_cases(void (*tests)(void), const union decode_item *table) > return 0; > } > > - I know the above blank line isn't needed but I believe the convention is to avoid doing unrelated white-space clean-ups in patches. > static int __init run_all_tests(void) > { > int ret = 0;
On 3 January 2014 17:53, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 18:19 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: >> From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> >> >> Ensure we read instructions in the correct endian-ness by using >> the <asm/opcodes.h> helper to transform them as necessary. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> >> [taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org: fix next_instruction() function] >> Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org> >> --- > > Apart from the spurious line removal (see below) then: > > Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org> > > and you can include an ACK for the other patches in this series too. > > Thanks. >> @@ -1593,7 +1594,6 @@ static int run_test_cases(void (*tests)(void), const union decode_item *table) >> return 0; >> } >> >> - > > I know the above blank line isn't needed but I believe the convention is > to avoid doing unrelated white-space clean-ups in patches. Right, I will remove it. Should this series go through Russell's patch tracking system or it can be pulled to some tree?
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 12:54 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: > On 3 January 2014 17:53, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 18:19 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: > >> From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> > >> > >> Ensure we read instructions in the correct endian-ness by using > >> the <asm/opcodes.h> helper to transform them as necessary. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> > >> [taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org: fix next_instruction() function] > >> Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org> > >> --- > > > > Apart from the spurious line removal (see below) then: > > > > Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org> > > > > and you can include an ACK for the other patches in this series too. > > > > Thanks. > > >> @@ -1593,7 +1594,6 @@ static int run_test_cases(void (*tests)(void), const union decode_item *table) > >> return 0; > >> } > >> > >> - > > > > I know the above blank line isn't needed but I believe the convention is > > to avoid doing unrelated white-space clean-ups in patches. > > Right, I will remove it. > Should this series go through Russell's patch tracking system or it > can be pulled > to some tree? I would assume as a pull request sent to Russell using the email alias he uses for these things: linux+pull@arm.linux.org.uk I'm sure he's shout up if I'm wrong...
Thanks. I'll prepare a pull request. On 9 January 2014 13:04, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 12:54 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: >> On 3 January 2014 17:53, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@linaro.org> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 18:19 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: >> >> From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> >> >> >> >> Ensure we read instructions in the correct endian-ness by using >> >> the <asm/opcodes.h> helper to transform them as necessary. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> >> >> [taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org: fix next_instruction() function] >> >> Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org> >> >> --- >> > >> > Apart from the spurious line removal (see below) then: >> > >> > Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org> >> > >> > and you can include an ACK for the other patches in this series too. >> > >> > Thanks. >> >> >> @@ -1593,7 +1594,6 @@ static int run_test_cases(void (*tests)(void), const union decode_item *table) >> >> return 0; >> >> } >> >> >> >> - >> > >> > I know the above blank line isn't needed but I believe the convention is >> > to avoid doing unrelated white-space clean-ups in patches. >> >> Right, I will remove it. >> Should this series go through Russell's patch tracking system or it >> can be pulled >> to some tree? > > I would assume as a pull request sent to Russell using the email alias > he uses for these things: linux+pull@arm.linux.org.uk I'm sure he's > shout up if I'm wrong... > > -- > Tixy >
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c index 0cd63d0..96e3dbc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c @@ -1329,7 +1329,8 @@ static void test_case_failed(const char *message) static unsigned long next_instruction(unsigned long pc) { #ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL - if ((pc & 1) && !is_wide_instruction(*(u16 *)(pc - 1))) + if ((pc & 1) && + !is_wide_instruction(__mem_to_opcode_thumb16(*(u16 *)(pc - 1)))) return pc + 2; else #endif @@ -1374,13 +1375,13 @@ static uintptr_t __used kprobes_test_case_start(const char *title, void *stack) if (test_case_is_thumb) { u16 *p = (u16 *)(test_code & ~1); - current_instruction = p[0]; + current_instruction = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(p[0]); if (is_wide_instruction(current_instruction)) { - current_instruction <<= 16; - current_instruction |= p[1]; + u16 instr2 = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(p[1]); + current_instruction = __opcode_thumb32_compose(current_instruction, instr2); } } else { - current_instruction = *(u32 *)test_code; + current_instruction = __mem_to_opcode_arm(*(u32 *)test_code); } if (current_title[0] == '.') @@ -1593,7 +1594,6 @@ static int run_test_cases(void (*tests)(void), const union decode_item *table) return 0; } - static int __init run_all_tests(void) { int ret = 0;