diff mbox

[RFC,00/73] tree-wide: clean up some no longer required #include <linux/init.h>

Message ID 20140123003838.GA10182@windriver.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Paul Gortmaker Jan. 23, 2014, 12:38 a.m. UTC 
[Re: [PATCH RFC 00/73] tree-wide: clean up some no longer required #include <linux/init.h>] On 22/01/2014 (Wed 18:00) Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi Paul,
> 
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:22:03 -0500 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> >
> > Where: This work exists as a queue of patches that I apply to
> > linux-next; since the changes are fixing some things that currently
> > can only be found there.  The patch series can be found at:
> > 
> >    http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git
> >    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git
> > 
> > I've avoided annoying Stephen with another queue of patches for
> > linux-next while the development content was in flux, but now that
> > the merge window has opened, and new additions are fewer, perhaps he
> > wouldn't mind tacking it on the end...  Stephen?
> 
> OK, I have added this to the end of linux-next today - we will see how we
> go.  It is called "init".

Thanks, it was a great help as it uncovered a few issues in fringe arch
that I didn't have toolchains for, and I've fixed all of those up.

I've noticed that powerpc has been un-buildable for a while now; I have
used this hack patch locally so I could run the ppc defconfigs to check
that I didn't break anything.  Maybe useful for linux-next in the
interim?  It is a hack patch -- Not-Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker.  :)

Paul.
--


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Benjamin Herrenschmidt Jan. 28, 2014, 3:13 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 19:38 -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> Thanks, it was a great help as it uncovered a few issues in fringe arch
> that I didn't have toolchains for, and I've fixed all of those up.
> 
> I've noticed that powerpc has been un-buildable for a while now; I have
> used this hack patch locally so I could run the ppc defconfigs to check
> that I didn't break anything.  Maybe useful for linux-next in the
> interim?  It is a hack patch -- Not-Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker.  :)

Can you and/or Aneesh submit that as a proper patch (with S-O-B
etc...) ?

Thanks !

Cheers,
Ben.

> Paul.
> --
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> index d27960c89a71..d0f070a2b395 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> @@ -560,9 +560,9 @@ extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  			    pmd_t *pmdp);
>  
>  #define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw
> -typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;
> -static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl,
> -					 spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl)
> +struct spinlock;
> +static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl,
> +					 struct spinlock *old_pmd_ptl)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * Archs like ppc64 use pgtable to store per pmd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Paul Gortmaker Jan. 28, 2014, 4:21 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 14-01-27 10:13 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 19:38 -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> 
>> Thanks, it was a great help as it uncovered a few issues in fringe arch
>> that I didn't have toolchains for, and I've fixed all of those up.
>>
>> I've noticed that powerpc has been un-buildable for a while now; I have
>> used this hack patch locally so I could run the ppc defconfigs to check
>> that I didn't break anything.  Maybe useful for linux-next in the
>> interim?  It is a hack patch -- Not-Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker.  :)
> 
> Can you and/or Aneesh submit that as a proper patch (with S-O-B
> etc...) ?

I'd updated toolchains and didn't realize it was still broken.  Patch sent.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/314749/

Paul.
--

> 
> Thanks !
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 
>> Paul.
>> --
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> index d27960c89a71..d0f070a2b395 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> @@ -560,9 +560,9 @@ extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>  			    pmd_t *pmdp);
>>  
>>  #define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw
>> -typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;
>> -static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl,
>> -					 spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl)
>> +struct spinlock;
>> +static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl,
>> +					 struct spinlock *old_pmd_ptl)
>>  {
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Archs like ppc64 use pgtable to store per pmd
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
index d27960c89a71..d0f070a2b395 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
@@ -560,9 +560,9 @@  extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 			    pmd_t *pmdp);
 
 #define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw
-typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;
-static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl,
-					 spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl)
+struct spinlock;
+static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl,
+					 struct spinlock *old_pmd_ptl)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Archs like ppc64 use pgtable to store per pmd