| Message ID | 1395321473-1257-1-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:17:53PM +0000, Steve Capper wrote: > Introduce huge pte versions of pte_page, pte_present and pte_young. > > This allows ARM (without LPAE) to use alternative pte processing logic > for huge ptes. > > Generic implementations that call the standard pte versions are also > added to asm-generic/hugetlb.h. > > Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> > --- > Changed in V2 - moved from #ifndef,#define macros to entries in > asm-generic/hugetlb.h as it makes more sense to have these with the > other huge_pte_. definitions. > > The only other architecture I can see that does not use > asm-generic/hugetlb.h is s390. This patch includes trivial definitions > for huge_pte_{page,present,young} for s390. > > I've compile-tested this for s390, but don't have one under my desk so > have not been able to test it. > --- > arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ > include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ > mm/hugetlb.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > Hello, I was just wondering if this patch looked reasonable to people? Cheers,
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:11:30 +0000 Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:17:53PM +0000, Steve Capper wrote: > > Introduce huge pte versions of pte_page, pte_present and pte_young. > > > > This allows ARM (without LPAE) to use alternative pte processing logic > > for huge ptes. > > > > Generic implementations that call the standard pte versions are also > > added to asm-generic/hugetlb.h. > > > > Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> > > --- > > Changed in V2 - moved from #ifndef,#define macros to entries in > > asm-generic/hugetlb.h as it makes more sense to have these with the > > other huge_pte_. definitions. > > > > The only other architecture I can see that does not use > > asm-generic/hugetlb.h is s390. This patch includes trivial definitions > > for huge_pte_{page,present,young} for s390. > > > > I've compile-tested this for s390, but don't have one under my desk so > > have not been able to test it. > > --- > > arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > mm/hugetlb.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > > 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > Hello, > I was just wondering if this patch looked reasonable to people? Looks good, and I also tested it on s390, so for the s390 part: Acked-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
On 28 March 2014 16:28, Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:11:30 +0000 > Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:17:53PM +0000, Steve Capper wrote: >> > Introduce huge pte versions of pte_page, pte_present and pte_young. >> > >> > This allows ARM (without LPAE) to use alternative pte processing logic >> > for huge ptes. >> > >> > Generic implementations that call the standard pte versions are also >> > added to asm-generic/hugetlb.h. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> >> > --- >> > Changed in V2 - moved from #ifndef,#define macros to entries in >> > asm-generic/hugetlb.h as it makes more sense to have these with the >> > other huge_pte_. definitions. >> > >> > The only other architecture I can see that does not use >> > asm-generic/hugetlb.h is s390. This patch includes trivial definitions >> > for huge_pte_{page,present,young} for s390. >> > >> > I've compile-tested this for s390, but don't have one under my desk so >> > have not been able to test it. >> > --- >> > arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ >> > include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ >> > mm/hugetlb.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- >> > 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> > >> >> Hello, >> I was just wondering if this patch looked reasonable to people? > > Looks good, and I also tested it on s390, so for the s390 part: > Acked-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> > Thanks!
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h index 11eae5f..7b13ec0 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h @@ -112,4 +112,19 @@ static inline pte_t huge_pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot) return pte_modify(pte, newprot); } +static inline struct page *huge_pte_page(pte_t pte) +{ + return pte_page(pte); +} + +static inline unsigned long huge_pte_present(pte_t pte) +{ + return pte_present(pte); +} + +static inline pte_t huge_pte_mkyoung(pte_t pte) +{ + return pte_mkyoung(pte); +} + #endif /* _ASM_S390_HUGETLB_H */ diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h index 99b490b..2dc68fe 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h @@ -37,4 +37,19 @@ static inline void huge_pte_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_clear(mm, addr, ptep); } +static inline struct page *huge_pte_page(pte_t pte) +{ + return pte_page(pte); +} + +static inline unsigned long huge_pte_present(pte_t pte) +{ + return pte_present(pte); +} + +static inline pte_t huge_pte_mkyoung(pte_t pte) +{ + return pte_mkyoung(pte); +} + #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_HUGETLB_H */ diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index c01cb9f..d1a38c9 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -2319,7 +2319,7 @@ static pte_t make_huge_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page, entry = huge_pte_wrprotect(mk_huge_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot)); } - entry = pte_mkyoung(entry); + entry = huge_pte_mkyoung(entry); entry = pte_mkhuge(entry); entry = arch_make_huge_pte(entry, vma, page, writable); @@ -2379,7 +2379,7 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src, if (cow) huge_ptep_set_wrprotect(src, addr, src_pte); entry = huge_ptep_get(src_pte); - ptepage = pte_page(entry); + ptepage = huge_pte_page(entry); get_page(ptepage); page_dup_rmap(ptepage); set_huge_pte_at(dst, addr, dst_pte, entry); @@ -2398,7 +2398,7 @@ static int is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte_t pte) { swp_entry_t swp; - if (huge_pte_none(pte) || pte_present(pte)) + if (huge_pte_none(pte) || huge_pte_present(pte)) return 0; swp = pte_to_swp_entry(pte); if (non_swap_entry(swp) && is_migration_entry(swp)) @@ -2411,7 +2411,7 @@ static int is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(pte_t pte) { swp_entry_t swp; - if (huge_pte_none(pte) || pte_present(pte)) + if (huge_pte_none(pte) || huge_pte_present(pte)) return 0; swp = pte_to_swp_entry(pte); if (non_swap_entry(swp) && is_hwpoison_entry(swp)) @@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ again: goto unlock; } - page = pte_page(pte); + page = huge_pte_page(pte); /* * If a reference page is supplied, it is because a specific * page is being unmapped, not a range. Ensure the page we @@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ static int hugetlb_cow(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long mmun_start; /* For mmu_notifiers */ unsigned long mmun_end; /* For mmu_notifiers */ - old_page = pte_page(pte); + old_page = huge_pte_page(pte); retry_avoidcopy: /* If no-one else is actually using this page, avoid the copy @@ -2965,7 +2965,7 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, * Note that locking order is always pagecache_page -> page, * so no worry about deadlock. */ - page = pte_page(entry); + page = huge_pte_page(entry); get_page(page); if (page != pagecache_page) lock_page(page); @@ -2985,7 +2985,7 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, } entry = huge_pte_mkdirty(entry); } - entry = pte_mkyoung(entry); + entry = huge_pte_mkyoung(entry); if (huge_ptep_set_access_flags(vma, address, ptep, entry, flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE)) update_mmu_cache(vma, address, ptep); @@ -3077,7 +3077,7 @@ long follow_hugetlb_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, } pfn_offset = (vaddr & ~huge_page_mask(h)) >> PAGE_SHIFT; - page = pte_page(huge_ptep_get(pte)); + page = huge_pte_page(huge_ptep_get(pte)); same_page: if (pages) { pages[i] = mem_map_offset(page, pfn_offset); @@ -3425,7 +3425,7 @@ follow_huge_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, { struct page *page; - page = pte_page(*(pte_t *)pmd); + page = huge_pte_page(*(pte_t *)pmd); if (page) page += ((address & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT); return page; @@ -3437,7 +3437,7 @@ follow_huge_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, { struct page *page; - page = pte_page(*(pte_t *)pud); + page = huge_pte_page(*(pte_t *)pud); if (page) page += ((address & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT); return page;
Introduce huge pte versions of pte_page, pte_present and pte_young. This allows ARM (without LPAE) to use alternative pte processing logic for huge ptes. Generic implementations that call the standard pte versions are also added to asm-generic/hugetlb.h. Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> --- Changed in V2 - moved from #ifndef,#define macros to entries in asm-generic/hugetlb.h as it makes more sense to have these with the other huge_pte_. definitions. The only other architecture I can see that does not use asm-generic/hugetlb.h is s390. This patch includes trivial definitions for huge_pte_{page,present,young} for s390. I've compile-tested this for s390, but don't have one under my desk so have not been able to test it. --- arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ mm/hugetlb.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)