diff mbox

[v2,3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: L2 cache support

Message ID 20140411112500.GM27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Russell King - ARM Linux April 11, 2014, 11:25 a.m. UTC
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:03:57AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> Here is a revised patch which is just an extension of your patch 
> with L2C-220 case handled. I dont really have L2C-220 hardware so even 
> if you want to handle that at a later time, it would be perfectly okay 
> with me.

This is what I came up with, which of course is very similar to yours.
I think the only difference is that I'm allowing the state of the NS
access bits to be preserved by the OMAP code, getting OMAP closer to
the target of a ~0 mask.  The only bits which are clear in the mask
passed into the L2 code by OMAP now are:

- L310_AUX_CTRL_INSTR_PREFETCH
- L310_AUX_CTRL_DATA_PREFETCH
- L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR
- L2C_AUX_CTRL_SHARED_OVERRIDE
- L2C_AUX_CTRL_PARITY_ENABLE

It sounds like we can kill L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR as well since
that's already set for us (and fwir is the power-on-reset default too.)

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c |  4 +---
 arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c           | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Sekhar Nori April 11, 2014, 12:01 p.m. UTC | #1
On Friday 11 April 2014 04:55 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:03:57AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> Here is a revised patch which is just an extension of your patch 
>> with L2C-220 case handled. I dont really have L2C-220 hardware so even 
>> if you want to handle that at a later time, it would be perfectly okay 
>> with me.
> 
> This is what I came up with, which of course is very similar to yours.
> I think the only difference is that I'm allowing the state of the NS
> access bits to be preserved by the OMAP code, getting OMAP closer to
> the target of a ~0 mask.  The only bits which are clear in the mask
> passed into the L2 code by OMAP now are:

Thanks for sending the patch. I will use it to rebase the $subject
series against.

> 
> - L310_AUX_CTRL_INSTR_PREFETCH
> - L310_AUX_CTRL_DATA_PREFETCH
> - L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR
> - L2C_AUX_CTRL_SHARED_OVERRIDE
> - L2C_AUX_CTRL_PARITY_ENABLE
> 
> It sounds like we can kill L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR as well since
> that's already set for us (and fwir is the power-on-reset default too.)

Thanks right.

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sekhar Nori April 22, 2014, 5:48 a.m. UTC | #2
On Friday 11 April 2014 04:55 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:03:57AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> Here is a revised patch which is just an extension of your patch 
>> with L2C-220 case handled. I dont really have L2C-220 hardware so even 
>> if you want to handle that at a later time, it would be perfectly okay 
>> with me.
> 
> This is what I came up with, which of course is very similar to yours.
> I think the only difference is that I'm allowing the state of the NS
> access bits to be preserved by the OMAP code, getting OMAP closer to
> the target of a ~0 mask.  The only bits which are clear in the mask
> passed into the L2 code by OMAP now are:
> 
> - L310_AUX_CTRL_INSTR_PREFETCH
> - L310_AUX_CTRL_DATA_PREFETCH
> - L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR
> - L2C_AUX_CTRL_SHARED_OVERRIDE
> - L2C_AUX_CTRL_PARITY_ENABLE
> 
> It sounds like we can kill L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR as well since
> that's already set for us (and fwir is the power-on-reset default too.)
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c |  4 +---
>  arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c           | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
> index c0f9a81a2d32..3b01c5223b11 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ static int __init omap_l2_cache_init(void)
>  
>  	/* 16-way associativity, parity disabled, way size - 64KB (es2.0 +) */
>  	aux_ctrl = L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR |
> -		   L310_AUX_CTRL_NS_LOCKDOWN |
> -		   L310_AUX_CTRL_NS_INT_CTRL |
>  		   L2C_AUX_CTRL_SHARED_OVERRIDE |
>  		   L310_AUX_CTRL_DATA_PREFETCH |
>  		   L310_AUX_CTRL_INSTR_PREFETCH;
> @@ -223,7 +221,7 @@ static int __init omap_l2_cache_init(void)
>  	if (of_have_populated_dt())
>  		l2x0_of_init(aux_ctrl, 0xc19fffff);

Just noticed that the mask here too should have been changed to
0xcd9fffff. I will be making this change to the local version I am
committing to base my AM43x support series on.

>  	else
> -		l2x0_init(l2cache_base, aux_ctrl, 0xc19fffff);
> +		l2x0_init(l2cache_base, aux_ctrl, 0xcd9fffff);

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
index c0f9a81a2d32..3b01c5223b11 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
@@ -213,8 +213,6 @@  static int __init omap_l2_cache_init(void)
 
 	/* 16-way associativity, parity disabled, way size - 64KB (es2.0 +) */
 	aux_ctrl = L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR |
-		   L310_AUX_CTRL_NS_LOCKDOWN |
-		   L310_AUX_CTRL_NS_INT_CTRL |
 		   L2C_AUX_CTRL_SHARED_OVERRIDE |
 		   L310_AUX_CTRL_DATA_PREFETCH |
 		   L310_AUX_CTRL_INSTR_PREFETCH;
@@ -223,7 +221,7 @@  static int __init omap_l2_cache_init(void)
 	if (of_have_populated_dt())
 		l2x0_of_init(aux_ctrl, 0xc19fffff);
 	else
-		l2x0_init(l2cache_base, aux_ctrl, 0xc19fffff);
+		l2x0_init(l2cache_base, aux_ctrl, 0xcd9fffff);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
index 98796b789eb9..5ec454d51a9f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
@@ -502,11 +502,23 @@  static void l2c220_sync(void)
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags);
 }
 
+static void l2c220_enable(void __iomem *base, u32 aux, unsigned num_lock)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Always enable non-secure access to the lockdown registers -
+	 * we write to them as part of the L2C enable sequence so they
+	 * need to be accessible.
+	 */
+	aux |= L220_AUX_CTRL_NS_LOCKDOWN;
+
+	l2c_enable(base, aux, num_lock);
+}
+
 static const struct l2c_init_data l2c220_data = {
 	.type = "L2C-220",
 	.way_size_0 = SZ_8K,
 	.num_lock = 1,
-	.enable = l2c_enable,
+	.enable = l2c220_enable,
 	.save = l2c_save,
 	.outer_cache = {
 		.inv_range = l2c220_inv_range,
@@ -776,6 +788,13 @@  static void __init l2c310_enable(void __iomem *base, u32 aux, unsigned num_lock)
 			power_ctrl & L310_STNDBY_MODE_EN ? "en" : "dis");
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Always enable non-secure access to the lockdown registers -
+	 * we write to them as part of the L2C enable sequence so they
+	 * need to be accessible.
+	 */
+	aux |= L310_AUX_CTRL_NS_LOCKDOWN;
+
 	l2c_enable(base, aux, num_lock);
 
 	if (aux & L310_AUX_CTRL_FULL_LINE_ZERO) {
@@ -1052,7 +1071,7 @@  static const struct l2c_init_data of_l2c220_data __initconst = {
 	.way_size_0 = SZ_8K,
 	.num_lock = 1,
 	.of_parse = l2x0_of_parse,
-	.enable = l2c_enable,
+	.enable = l2c220_enable,
 	.save = l2c_save,
 	.outer_cache = {
 		.inv_range   = l2c220_inv_range,