Message ID | 1247649149-28353-1-git-send-email-yzhou@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 07/15/2009 12:12 PM, Yolkfull Chow wrote: > Would submit this patch which is from our internal kvm-autotest patches submitted by Jason. > So that we could go on test case about parameters verification(UUID, DMI data etc). > > Signed-off-by: Yolkfull Chow<yzhou@redhat.com> > --- > client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py > index 503f636..68cc235 100644 > --- a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py > +++ b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py > @@ -287,6 +287,10 @@ class VM: > elif params.get("display") == "nographic": > qemu_cmd += " -nographic" > > + uuid = os.popen("cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid").readline().strip() > + if uuid: > + qemu_cmd += " -uuid %s" % uuid If you'll change the uuid on every run, the guest will notice that. Some guest (M$) might not love it. Why not use a static uuid or even just test uuid in a specific test without having it in all tests? btw: why you're at it, please add uuid to the block devices too. + the -smbios option. Thanks, dor > + > return qemu_cmd > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 07/15/2009 09:36 PM, Dor Laor wrote: > On 07/15/2009 12:12 PM, Yolkfull Chow wrote: >> Would submit this patch which is from our internal kvm-autotest >> patches submitted by Jason. >> So that we could go on test case about parameters verification(UUID, >> DMI data etc). >> >> Signed-off-by: Yolkfull Chow<yzhou@redhat.com> >> --- >> client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py | 4 ++++ >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py >> index 503f636..68cc235 100644 >> --- a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py >> +++ b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py >> @@ -287,6 +287,10 @@ class VM: >> elif params.get("display") == "nographic": >> qemu_cmd += " -nographic" >> >> + uuid = os.popen("cat >> /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid").readline().strip() >> + if uuid: >> + qemu_cmd += " -uuid %s" % uuid > > If you'll change the uuid on every run, the guest will notice that. > Some guest (M$) might not love it. > Why not use a static uuid or even just test uuid in a specific test > without having it in all tests? Hi Dor, since we cannot use a static uuid for running stress_boot test, but just assign UUID in a specific test is a good idea. We could use an option like assign_uuid = yes for that specific test? > > btw: why you're at it, please add uuid to the block devices too. > + the -smbios option. Do you mean assign serial number for block devices? Thanks for suggestions. :) > > Thanks, > dor > >> + >> return qemu_cmd >> >> >
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Yolkfull Chow<yzhou@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/15/2009 09:36 PM, Dor Laor wrote: >> On 07/15/2009 12:12 PM, Yolkfull Chow wrote: >>> Would submit this patch which is from our internal kvm-autotest >>> patches submitted by Jason. >>> So that we could go on test case about parameters verification(UUID, >>> DMI data etc). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yolkfull Chow<yzhou@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> Â client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py | Â Â 4 ++++ >>> Â 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py >>> index 503f636..68cc235 100644 >>> --- a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py >>> +++ b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py >>> @@ -287,6 +287,10 @@ class VM: >>> Â Â Â Â Â elif params.get("display") == "nographic": >>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â qemu_cmd += " -nographic" >>> >>> + Â Â Â Â uuid = os.popen("cat >>> /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid").readline().strip() >>> + Â Â Â Â if uuid: >>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â qemu_cmd += " -uuid %s" % uuid >> >> If you'll change the uuid on every run, the guest will notice that. >> Some guest (M$) might not love it. >> Why not use a static uuid or even just test uuid in a specific test >> without having it in all tests? > Hi Dor, since we cannot use a static uuid for running stress_boot test, > but just assign UUID in a specific test is a good idea. We could use an > option like assign_uuid = yes for that specific test? This will be far better and more flexible. >> >> btw: why you're at it, please add uuid to the block devices too. >> + the -smbios option. > Do you mean assign serial number for block devices? > > Thanks for suggestions. :) >> >> Thanks, >> dor >> >>> + >>> Â Â Â Â Â return qemu_cmd >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Yolkfull > Regards, > > _______________________________________________ > Autotest mailing list > Autotest@test.kernel.org > http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest >
----- "sudhir kumar" <smalikphy@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Yolkfull Chow<yzhou@redhat.com> > wrote: > > On 07/15/2009 09:36 PM, Dor Laor wrote: > >> On 07/15/2009 12:12 PM, Yolkfull Chow wrote: > >>> Would submit this patch which is from our internal kvm-autotest > >>> patches submitted by Jason. > >>> So that we could go on test case about parameters > verification(UUID, > >>> DMI data etc). > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Yolkfull Chow<yzhou@redhat.com> > >>> --- > >>> Â client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py | Â Â 4 ++++ > >>> Â 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py > b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py > >>> index 503f636..68cc235 100644 > >>> --- a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py > >>> +++ b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py > >>> @@ -287,6 +287,10 @@ class VM: > >>> Â Â Â Â Â elif params.get("display") == "nographic": > >>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â qemu_cmd += " -nographic" > >>> > >>> + Â Â Â Â uuid = os.popen("cat > >>> /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid").readline().strip() > >>> + Â Â Â Â if uuid: > >>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â qemu_cmd += " -uuid %s" % uuid > >> > >> If you'll change the uuid on every run, the guest will notice > that. > >> Some guest (M$) might not love it. > >> Why not use a static uuid or even just test uuid in a specific > test > >> without having it in all tests? > > Hi Dor, since we cannot use a static uuid for running stress_boot > test, > > but just assign UUID in a specific test is a good idea. We could use > an > > option like assign_uuid = yes for that specific test? > > This will be far better and more flexible. Why not allow both static: uuid = 7032808e-7d90-4921-b95d-fa0e11c9659c and random: uuid = random If uuid == random, VM.create() will generate a random one. Otherwise it will use the one given. BTW, the code that generates a random uuid should be in VM.create(), not in VM.make_qemu_command(). VM.make_qemu_command() should be deterministic. VM.create() should store the uuid in an attribute (e.g. self.uuid = ...) and then VM.make_qemu_command() should use this attribute. This is important because we use VM.make_qemu_command() to see if the VM needs to be restarted, and if the uuid changes every time VM.make_qemu_command() is called, the VM will always be restarted, even if no parameters change. (When running a test, we normally use the existing VM without killing and restarting it; we restart only if the qemu command of the new test is different, or if the user explicitly requested a restart via the config file.) > >> btw: why you're at it, please add uuid to the block devices too. > >> + the -smbios option. > > Do you mean assign serial number for block devices? > > > > Thanks for suggestions. :) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> dor > >> > >>> + > >>> Â Â Â Â Â return qemu_cmd > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Yolkfull > > Regards, > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Autotest mailing list > > Autotest@test.kernel.org > > http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest > > > > > > -- > Sudhir Kumar > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py index 503f636..68cc235 100644 --- a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py +++ b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py @@ -287,6 +287,10 @@ class VM: elif params.get("display") == "nographic": qemu_cmd += " -nographic" + uuid = os.popen("cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid").readline().strip() + if uuid: + qemu_cmd += " -uuid %s" % uuid + return qemu_cmd
Would submit this patch which is from our internal kvm-autotest patches submitted by Jason. So that we could go on test case about parameters verification(UUID, DMI data etc). Signed-off-by: Yolkfull Chow <yzhou@redhat.com> --- client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)