diff mbox

[1/3] ARM: dts: Add PMU reg node to exynos4210

Message ID 1396425778-4379-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Pankaj Dubey April 2, 2014, 8:02 a.m. UTC
This patch adds pmu regnode to exynos4210 dtsi to handle
PMU register access via DT.

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi |    5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Vikas Sajjan April 24, 2014, 11:59 a.m. UTC | #1
+Tomasz


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote:
> This patch adds pmu regnode to exynos4210 dtsi to handle
> PMU register access via DT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi |    5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> index cacf614..0a2c0fe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> @@ -81,6 +81,11 @@
>                 interrupts = <2 2>, <3 2>;
>         };
>
> +       pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10020000 {
> +               compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu", "syscon";
> +               reg = <0x10020000 0x5000>;

Can we have 2 strings as "compatible" and these 2 strings are used by
2 different driver?

Because once syscon driver gets probed, exynos-pmu.c [1] driver will
never be probed.

The new PMU driver [1] completely relies on this. With just
exynos_defconfig, you will not notice this issue, since syscon is NOT
enabled by exynos_defconfig. When I enabled "System Controller
Register R/W Based on Regmap" in menuconfig, I could see PMU driver
[1] is NEVER probed.

Let me know, if I am missing something.

 [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg319750.html


> +       };
> +
>         pinctrl_0: pinctrl@11400000 {
>                 compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pinctrl";
>                 reg = <0x11400000 0x1000>;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Pankaj Dubey April 24, 2014, 12:57 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Vikas,

On 04/24/2014 08:59 PM, Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> +Tomasz
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote:
>> This patch adds pmu regnode to exynos4210 dtsi to handle
>> PMU register access via DT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi |    5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
>> index cacf614..0a2c0fe 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
>> @@ -81,6 +81,11 @@
>>                  interrupts = <2 2>, <3 2>;
>>          };
>>
>> +       pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10020000 {
>> +               compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu", "syscon";
>> +               reg = <0x10020000 0x5000>;
> Can we have 2 strings as "compatible" and these 2 strings are used by
> 2 different driver?
>
> Because once syscon driver gets probed, exynos-pmu.c [1] driver will
> never be probed.
>
> The new PMU driver [1] completely relies on this. With just
> exynos_defconfig, you will not notice this issue, since syscon is NOT
> enabled by exynos_defconfig. When I enabled "System Controller
> Register R/W Based on Regmap" in menuconfig, I could see PMU driver
> [1] is NEVER probed.
>
> Let me know, if I am missing something.
>
>   [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg319750.html

You are correct. We also missed this because "SYSCON" option was
not enabled in exynos_defconfig.
I noticed this during preparation of V2 when I planned to use
"early_syscon_init" [1] as suggested by Sylwester here [2].

In V2 I will take care of this. I hope soon I will be able to post second
version of this series, just waiting for testing and internal code review.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/8/239
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/2/171
>
>
>> +       };
>> +
>>          pinctrl_0: pinctrl@11400000 {
>>                  compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pinctrl";
>>                  reg = <0x11400000 0x1000>;
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Vikas Sajjan April 24, 2014, 1:26 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Pankaj,

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Vikas,
>
>
> On 04/24/2014 08:59 PM, Vikas Sajjan wrote:
>>
>> +Tomasz
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch adds pmu regnode to exynos4210 dtsi to handle
>>> PMU register access via DT.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi |    5 +++++
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
>>> index cacf614..0a2c0fe 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
>>> @@ -81,6 +81,11 @@
>>>                  interrupts = <2 2>, <3 2>;
>>>          };
>>>
>>> +       pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10020000 {
>>> +               compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu", "syscon";
>>> +               reg = <0x10020000 0x5000>;
>>
>> Can we have 2 strings as "compatible" and these 2 strings are used by
>> 2 different driver?
>>
>> Because once syscon driver gets probed, exynos-pmu.c [1] driver will
>> never be probed.
>>
>> The new PMU driver [1] completely relies on this. With just
>> exynos_defconfig, you will not notice this issue, since syscon is NOT
>> enabled by exynos_defconfig. When I enabled "System Controller
>> Register R/W Based on Regmap" in menuconfig, I could see PMU driver
>> [1] is NEVER probed.
>>
>> Let me know, if I am missing something.
>>
>>   [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg319750.html
>
>
> You are correct. We also missed this because "SYSCON" option was
> not enabled in exynos_defconfig.
> I noticed this during preparation of V2 when I planned to use
> "early_syscon_init" [1] as suggested by Sylwester here [2].
>
OK.

> In V2 I will take care of this. I hope soon I will be able to post second

So in your V2, will you be adding new DT node altogether for PMU?
Because with existing DT node "pmu_system_controller"  (which is
already present in mailine for exynos 5250) and SYSCON driver enable,
exynos PMU driver will NEVER probed.

> version of this series, just waiting for testing and internal code review.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/8/239
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/2/171
>
>>
>>
>>> +       };
>>> +
>>>          pinctrl_0: pinctrl@11400000 {
>>>                  compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pinctrl";
>>>                  reg = <0x11400000 0x1000>;
>>> --
>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Pankaj Dubey
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
index cacf614..0a2c0fe 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
@@ -81,6 +81,11 @@ 
 		interrupts = <2 2>, <3 2>;
 	};
 
+	pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10020000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu", "syscon";
+		reg = <0x10020000 0x5000>;
+	};
+
 	pinctrl_0: pinctrl@11400000 {
 		compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pinctrl";
 		reg = <0x11400000 0x1000>;