diff mbox

[v2] mfd: Correct ro and cd implemantion on DM355

Message ID 1248263045-12108-1-git-send-email-vipin.bhandari@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State Rejected
Headers show

Commit Message

Vipin Bhandari July 22, 2009, 11:44 a.m. UTC
This patch corrects the support for MMCSD card detection
and read only feature for SoC DM355.

EVMDM355_ECP_VA4.pdf, from Spectrum digital, suggests that
Bit 2 and 4 should be checked for card detection. However
on the EVM, bits 1 and 3 gives this status, for MMC/SD
instance 0 and 1 respectively. The pdf also suggests that
Bit 1 and 3 should be checked for write protection. However
on the EVM bits 2 and 4 gives this status.

This document can be downloaded from
http://c6000.spectrumdigital.com/evmdm355/reve/files/EVMDM355_ECP_VA4.pdf

Signed-off-by: Vipin Bhandari <vipin.bhandari@ti.com>
---
 This patch has been tested on DM355 EVM.

 Since the previous version, format of the multi-line comment
 has been corrected.

 drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

David Brownell July 22, 2009, 6:20 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Vipin Bhandari wrote:
> This patch corrects the support for MMCSD card detection
> and read only feature for SoC DM355.
> 
> EVMDM355_ECP_VA4.pdf, from Spectrum digital, suggests that
> Bit 2 and 4 should be checked for card detection. However
> on the EVM, bits 1 and 3 gives this status, for MMC/SD
> instance 0 and 1 respectively. The pdf also suggests that
> Bit 1 and 3 should be checked for write protection. However
> on the EVM bits 2 and 4 gives this status.

In short:  card detection works iff the writeprotect switch
isn't used, since the two signals are swapped.

> 
> This document can be downloaded from
> http://c6000.spectrumdigital.com/evmdm355/reve/files/EVMDM355_ECP_VA4.pdf
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Bhandari <vipin.bhandari@ti.com>

Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>

.... but this should merge through the MFD tree.  Send it to
(per MAINTAINERS):

MULTIFUNCTION DEVICES (MFD)
P:      Samuel Ortiz
M:      sameo@linux.intel.com
T:      git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sameo/mfd-2.6.git
S:      Supported
F:      drivers/mfd/

> ---
>  This patch has been tested on DM355 EVM.
> 
>  Since the previous version, format of the multi-line comment
>  has been corrected.
> 
>  drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c |   12 ++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c b/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c
> index 5b6e58a..3d4a861 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c
> @@ -107,8 +107,16 @@ static const u8 msp_gpios[] = {
>  	MSP_GPIO(2, SWITCH1), MSP_GPIO(3, SWITCH1),
>  	MSP_GPIO(4, SWITCH1),
>  	/* switches on MMC/SD sockets */
> -	MSP_GPIO(1, SDMMC), MSP_GPIO(2, SDMMC),	/* mmc0 WP, nCD */
> -	MSP_GPIO(3, SDMMC), MSP_GPIO(4, SDMMC),	/* mmc1 WP, nCD */
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: EVMDM355_ECP_VA4.pdf suggests that Bit 2 and 4 should be
> +	 * checked for card detection. However on the EVM bit 1 and 3 gives
> +	 * this status, for 0 and 1 instance respectively. The pdf also
> +	 * suggests that Bit 1 and 3 should be checked for write protection.
> +	 * However on the EVM bit 2 and 4 gives this status,for 0 and 1
> +	 * instance respectively.
> +	 */
> +	MSP_GPIO(2, SDMMC), MSP_GPIO(1, SDMMC),	/* mmc0 WP, nCD */
> +	MSP_GPIO(4, SDMMC), MSP_GPIO(3, SDMMC),	/* mmc1 WP, nCD */
>  };
>  
>  #define MSP_GPIO_REG(offset)	(msp_gpios[(offset)] >> 3)
> -- 
> 1.5.6
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
> Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
> http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
> 
>
Kevin Hilman July 23, 2009, 2:14 p.m. UTC | #2
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> writes:

> On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Vipin Bhandari wrote:
>> This patch corrects the support for MMCSD card detection
>> and read only feature for SoC DM355.
>> 
>> EVMDM355_ECP_VA4.pdf, from Spectrum digital, suggests that
>> Bit 2 and 4 should be checked for card detection. However
>> on the EVM, bits 1 and 3 gives this status, for MMC/SD
>> instance 0 and 1 respectively. The pdf also suggests that
>> Bit 1 and 3 should be checked for write protection. However
>> on the EVM bits 2 and 4 gives this status.
>
> In short:  card detection works iff the writeprotect switch
> isn't used, since the two signals are swapped.
>
>> 
>> This document can be downloaded from
>> http://c6000.spectrumdigital.com/evmdm355/reve/files/EVMDM355_ECP_VA4.pdf
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vipin Bhandari <vipin.bhandari@ti.com>
>
> Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>

Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c b/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c
index 5b6e58a..3d4a861 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c
@@ -107,8 +107,16 @@  static const u8 msp_gpios[] = {
 	MSP_GPIO(2, SWITCH1), MSP_GPIO(3, SWITCH1),
 	MSP_GPIO(4, SWITCH1),
 	/* switches on MMC/SD sockets */
-	MSP_GPIO(1, SDMMC), MSP_GPIO(2, SDMMC),	/* mmc0 WP, nCD */
-	MSP_GPIO(3, SDMMC), MSP_GPIO(4, SDMMC),	/* mmc1 WP, nCD */
+	/*
+	 * Note: EVMDM355_ECP_VA4.pdf suggests that Bit 2 and 4 should be
+	 * checked for card detection. However on the EVM bit 1 and 3 gives
+	 * this status, for 0 and 1 instance respectively. The pdf also
+	 * suggests that Bit 1 and 3 should be checked for write protection.
+	 * However on the EVM bit 2 and 4 gives this status,for 0 and 1
+	 * instance respectively.
+	 */
+	MSP_GPIO(2, SDMMC), MSP_GPIO(1, SDMMC),	/* mmc0 WP, nCD */
+	MSP_GPIO(4, SDMMC), MSP_GPIO(3, SDMMC),	/* mmc1 WP, nCD */
 };
 
 #define MSP_GPIO_REG(offset)	(msp_gpios[(offset)] >> 3)