diff mbox

[v4,02/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Move cpufreq and cpuidle device registration to init_machine

Message ID 1399704998-13321-3-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Pankaj Dubey May 10, 2014, 6:56 a.m. UTC
As exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init function have just one lines
of code for registering platform devices. We can move these lines to
exynos_dt_machine_init and delete exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init
function. This will help in reducing lines of code in exynos.c, making it
more cleaner.

Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   19 ++++---------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Tomasz Figa June 10, 2014, 11:46 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Pankaj,

On 10.05.2014 08:56, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> As exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init function have just one lines
> of code for registering platform devices. We can move these lines to
> exynos_dt_machine_init and delete exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init
> function. This will help in reducing lines of code in exynos.c, making it
> more cleaner.
> 
> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   19 ++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Btw. This and other simple clean-up patches from this series could be
applied separately, without re-spinning them every time with this series.

Best regards,
Tomasz
Pankaj Dubey June 17, 2014, 3:48 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Tomasz,

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Hi Pankaj,
> 
> On 10.05.2014 08:56, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> > As exynos_cpuidle_init and exynos_cpufreq_init function have just one
> > lines of code for registering platform devices. We can move these
> > lines to exynos_dt_machine_init and delete exynos_cpuidle_init and
> > exynos_cpufreq_init function. This will help in reducing lines of code
> > in exynos.c, making it more cleaner.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   19 ++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> 

Thanks for review.

> Btw. This and other simple clean-up patches from this series could be
applied
> separately, without re-spinning them every time with this series.
> 

OK, I will separate cleanup patches.

> Best regards,
> Tomasz

Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index bf8a473..288e414 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@ -176,19 +176,6 @@  static struct platform_device exynos_cpuidle = {
 	.id                = -1,
 };
 
-void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void)
-{
-	if (soc_is_exynos5440())
-		return;
-
-	platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
-}
-
-void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
-{
-	platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
-}
-
 static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
 {
 	if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))
@@ -303,8 +290,10 @@  static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
 		}
 	}
 
-	exynos_cpuidle_init();
-	exynos_cpufreq_init();
+	if (!soc_is_exynos5440())
+		platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
+
+	platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
 
 	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
 }