Message ID | 20190829135348.23569-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | adapt SOF to use snd-hda-codec-hdmi | expand |
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:53:41 +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > > Hi all, > here's a RFC patch series that adapts SOF (and one example machine > driver) to use snd-hda-codec-hdmi (patch_hdmi.c) codec driver > instead of hdac_hdmi (soc/codecs/hdac_hdmi.c). The primary goal > is unify the HDMI codec implementation between DSP and non-DSP HDA > configurations, offer same interface to user-space and reduce > maintenance load for all. > > Main points I'd like your input on: > > 1) Is the high-level approach ok? > - SOF already uses pci/hda/ for all others codecs, so HDMI > has been the sole exception where code has been duplicated. > - I've tried to keep changes to hda/hdmi minimal. > - This series implements logic to parse the PCM topology > in a dynamic fashion, so we do not have to change all > existing (and future) DSP topologis to use fixed PCM device > numbers for HDMI, and we avoid need to hardcode PCM > device numbers in machine driver code. > > 2) Can we drop hdac_hdmi and its support from machine drivers, or > do we need to make it optional and keep it around? > > - Current series does not add any Kconfig options, but > simply switches SOF to use HDA codecs for all, including > HDMI/DP. This means hdac_hdmi is never used with SOF > and could be dropped (if SST is ok as well). > - This may break some usage with SST (input is welcome!) > - The change is visible to applications. The ALSA mixer > interface is different (OTOH with the new driver, playback > works out-of-the-box while with hdac_hdmi you needed to > set the multiple controls first, to have any audio out). > - Alternatively I could add a KConfig option and we could > have a deprecation period for hdac_hdmi, allowing people > to compile with the old driver during transition time. > This will require #ifdef'ing in all the machine drivers. > > .. once these are addressed, I can proceed to extend the patchset > with all affected machine drivers. > > Feature and testing info: > > - Tested on multiple Intel platforms supported by SOF. > - Tested with ALSA console tools as well as with Pulseaudio. > - requires Pulseaudio 12.x or newer, see > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2019-August/031358.html > - HDMI, DP, DP-MST with multi-monitor use-scenarios work ok. > - New feature for SOF: ELD /proc fs works just like in > DSP-less mode. > - New feature for SOF: jack detection works out-of-the-box > with Pulseaudio (no need for card specific UCM for HDMI) > - Pre-reviewed at: > https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/1155 IMO, the only and the most important point is whether it works as-is without changing the existing user-space, or exactly what scenario would be broken. If the breakage is significant, we may introduce a Kconfig, as you suggested. I don't think the mixer contents change are problematic. In the case of HDMI/DP, it's mostly read-only for fetching ELD or jack state. Other than that, I like the idea, the code change looks simple enough, and it'd make maintenance easier. thanks, Takashi > > Kai Vehmanen (7): > ALSA: hda - add mst_no_extra_pcms flag to hda_codec > ASoC: Intel: skl-hda-dsp-generic: use snd-hda-codec-hdmi > ASoC: hdac_hda: add support for HDMI/DP as a HDA codec > ALSA: hda/hdmi - allow control creation without a linked pcm > ALSA: hda/hdmi - implement mst_no_extra_pcms flag > ALSA: hda/hdmi - complete pcm_setup_pin without snd_pcm link > ASoC: SOF: Intel: load hda codec module also for HDMI/DP > > include/sound/hda_codec.h | 1 + > sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c | 31 ++++--- > sound/soc/codecs/hdac_hda.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++--- > sound/soc/codecs/hdac_hda.h | 10 ++- > sound/soc/intel/boards/skl_hda_dsp_common.c | 27 ++---- > sound/soc/intel/boards/skl_hda_dsp_common.h | 61 +++++++++++++ > sound/soc/intel/boards/skl_hda_dsp_generic.c | 7 -- > sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-codec.c | 11 +-- > sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.h | 5 +- > 9 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.17.1 >
Hi, On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> here's a RFC patch series that adapts SOF (and one example machine >> driver) to use snd-hda-codec-hdmi (patch_hdmi.c) codec driver >> instead of hdac_hdmi (soc/codecs/hdac_hdmi.c). The primary goal [...] >> 2) Can we drop hdac_hdmi and its support from machine drivers, or >> do we need to make it optional and keep it around? > > IMO, the only and the most important point is whether it works as-is > without changing the existing user-space, or exactly what scenario > would be broken. If the breakage is significant, we may introduce a > Kconfig, as you suggested. > > I don't think the mixer contents change are problematic. In the case > of HDMI/DP, it's mostly read-only for fetching ELD or jack state. I've been now continuing testing with different combinations of kernel/user-space and the two main problematic areas are: 1) systems with UCM defined with hdac-hdmi style controls -> as the card name will not change, the UCM usage will fail when kernel is updated to use different HDMI codec driver On some systems this is manageable as e.g. pulseaudio will fallback to legacy non-UCM path and e.g. HDMI/DP audio keeps working. But, but, this may be problematic if UCM is needed for other functionality on these systems. 2) machine drivers shared with SST/SOF Doing the HDMI codec change for old platforms handled with SST driver looks difficult to do, so we probably need to keep hdac-hdmi around for SST usage. That does mean machine drivers that are shared, need to support both options. Combining 1+2, it would seem safer to have a opt-in/opt-out possibility via Kconfig. I'm preparing a patchset for this -- let's see how it will look. Br, Kai
On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 16:18:11 +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > >> here's a RFC patch series that adapts SOF (and one example machine > >> driver) to use snd-hda-codec-hdmi (patch_hdmi.c) codec driver > >> instead of hdac_hdmi (soc/codecs/hdac_hdmi.c). The primary goal > [...] > >> 2) Can we drop hdac_hdmi and its support from machine drivers, or > >> do we need to make it optional and keep it around? > > > > IMO, the only and the most important point is whether it works as-is > > without changing the existing user-space, or exactly what scenario > > would be broken. If the breakage is significant, we may introduce a > > Kconfig, as you suggested. > > > > I don't think the mixer contents change are problematic. In the case > > of HDMI/DP, it's mostly read-only for fetching ELD or jack state. > > I've been now continuing testing with different combinations of > kernel/user-space and the two main problematic areas are: > > 1) systems with UCM defined with hdac-hdmi style controls > > -> as the card name will not change, the UCM usage will fail > when kernel is updated to use different HDMI codec driver > > On some systems this is manageable as e.g. pulseaudio will fallback to > legacy non-UCM path and e.g. HDMI/DP audio keeps working. But, but, this > may be problematic if UCM is needed for other functionality on these > systems. Just out of curiosity: which systems are with such UCM profiles? Chromebooks? > 2) machine drivers shared with SST/SOF > > Doing the HDMI codec change for old platforms handled with SST driver > looks difficult to do, so we probably need to keep hdac-hdmi around for > SST usage. That does mean machine drivers that are shared, need to support > both options. > > Combining 1+2, it would seem safer to have a opt-in/opt-out possibility > via Kconfig. I'm preparing a patchset for this -- let's see how it will > look. Agreed, some Kconfig is a safer option for now. thanks, Takashi
Hi, On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 16:18:11 +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > > On some systems this is manageable as e.g. pulseaudio will fallback to > > legacy non-UCM path and e.g. HDMI/DP audio keeps working. But, but, this > > may be problematic if UCM is needed for other functionality on these > > systems. > > Just out of curiosity: which systems are with such UCM profiles? > Chromebooks? I believe this year's XPS 13 Developer edition is one such device. I'll try to confirm if there are more cases. Br, Kai