Message ID | 20191211212025.1981822-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Fix year 2038 issue for sound subsystem | expand |
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:20:16 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > This is a series I worked on with Baolin in 2017 and 2018, but we > never quite managed to finish up the last pieces. During the > ALSA developer meetup at ELC-E 2018 in Edinburgh, a decision was > made to go with this approach for keeping best compatibility > with existing source code, and then I failed to follow up by > resending the patches. > > Now I have patches for all remaining time_t uses in the kernel, > so it's absolutely time to revisit them. I have done more > review of the patches myself and found a couple of minor issues > that I have fixed up, otherwise the series is still the same as > before. > > Conceptually, the idea of these patches is: > > - 64-bit applications should see no changes at all, neither > compile-time nor run-time. > > - 32-bit code compiled with a 64-bit time_t currently > does not work with ALSA, and requires kernel changes and/or > sound/asound.h changes > > - Most 32-bit code using these interfaces will work correctly > on a modified kernel, with or without the uapi header changes. > > - 32-bit code using SNDRV_TIMER_IOCTL_TREAD requires the > updated header file for 64-bit time_t support > > - 32-bit i386 user space with 64-bit time_t is broken for > SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_STATUS, SNDRV_RAWMIDI_IOCTL_STATUS and > SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR because of i386 alignment. This is also > addressed by the updated uapi header. > > - PCM mmap is currently supported on native x86 kernels > (both 32-bit and 64-bit) but not for compat mode. This series breaks > the 32-bit native mmap support for 32-bit time_t, but instead allows > it for 64-bit time_t on both native and compat kernels. This seems to > be the best trade-off, as mmap support is optional already, and most > 32-bit code runs in compat mode anyway. > > - I've tried to avoid breaking compilation of 32-bit code > as much as possible. Anything that does break however is likely code > that is already broken on 64-bit time_t and needs source changes to > fix them. > > I hope I addressed all review comments by now, so please pull this > for linux-5.6. > > A git branch with the same contents is available for testing at [1]. > > Arnd I see no issue other than the timer API patch Ben pointed. Could you resubmit that patch? Or just submit the whole as v8, I don't mind either way. Then we'll get this done for 5.6. Thanks! Takashi > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/playground.git y2038-alsa-v7 > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a2Os66+iwQYf97qh05W2JP8rmWao8zmKoHiXqVHvyYAJA@mail.gmail.com/T/#m6519cb07cfda08adf1dedea6596bb98892b4d5dc > > Changes since v6: (Arnd): > - Add a patch to update the API versions > - Hide a timespec reference in #ifndef __KERNEL__ to remove the > last reference to time_t > - Use a more readable way to do padding and describe it in the > changelog > - Rebase to linux-5.5-rc1, changing include/sound/soc-component.h > and sound/drivers/aloop.c as needed. > > Changes since v5 (Arnd): > - Rebased to linux-5.4-rc4 > - Updated to completely remove timespec and time_t references from alsa > - found and fixed a few bugs > > Changes since v4 (Baolin): > - Add patch 5 to change trigger_tstamp member of struct snd_pcm_runtime. > - Add patch 8 to change internal timespec. > - Add more explanation in commit message. > - Use ktime_get_real_ts64() in patch 6. > - Split common code out into a separate function in patch 6. > - Fix tu->tread bug in patch 6 and remove #if __BITS_PER_LONG == 64 macro. > > Changes since v3: > - Move struct snd_pcm_status32 to pcm.h file. > - Modify comments and commit message. > - Add new patch2 ~ patch6. > > Changes since v2: > - Renamed all structures to make clear. > - Remove CONFIG_X86_X32 macro and introduced new compat_snd_pcm_status64_x86_32. > > Changes since v1: > - Add one macro for struct snd_pcm_status_32 which only active in 32bits kernel. > - Convert pcm_compat.c to use struct snd_pcm_status_64. > - Convert pcm_native.c to use struct snd_pcm_status_64. > --- > > Arnd Bergmann (3): > ALSA: move snd_pcm_ioctl_sync_ptr_compat into pcm_native.c > ALSA: add new 32-bit layout for snd_pcm_mmap_status/control > ALSA: bump uapi version numbers > > Baolin Wang (6): > ALSA: Replace timespec with timespec64 > ALSA: Avoid using timespec for struct snd_timer_status > ALSA: Avoid using timespec for struct snd_ctl_elem_value > ALSA: Avoid using timespec for struct snd_pcm_status > ALSA: Avoid using timespec for struct snd_rawmidi_status > ALSA: Avoid using timespec for struct snd_timer_tread > > include/sound/pcm.h | 74 ++++++-- > include/sound/soc-component.h | 4 +- > include/sound/timer.h | 4 +- > include/uapi/sound/asound.h | 145 +++++++++++++-- > sound/core/pcm.c | 12 +- > sound/core/pcm_compat.c | 282 ++++++++---------------------- > sound/core/pcm_lib.c | 38 ++-- > sound/core/pcm_native.c | 226 +++++++++++++++++++++--- > sound/core/rawmidi.c | 132 +++++++++++--- > sound/core/rawmidi_compat.c | 87 +++------ > sound/core/timer.c | 229 ++++++++++++++++++------ > sound/core/timer_compat.c | 62 +------ > sound/drivers/aloop.c | 2 +- > sound/pci/hda/hda_controller.c | 10 +- > sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c | 4 +- > 15 files changed, 817 insertions(+), 494 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.0 >
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:20:16 +0100, > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > I hope I addressed all review comments by now, so please pull this > > for linux-5.6. > > > > A git branch with the same contents is available for testing at [1]. > > > > Arnd > > I see no issue other than the timer API patch Ben pointed. > > Could you resubmit that patch? Or just submit the whole as v8, I > don't mind either way. Then we'll get this done for 5.6. Can you take this as a pull request? That would be ideal for me, as I can then use it as a parent for a shared branch with additional cleanups on top (removing time_t etc) in linux-next. It also provides a nice place to preserve the series cover letter. I'm sending you the pull request now, and the last modified patch, in case you prefer the patch over a git tag. Thanks, Arnd
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 22:15:32 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:20:16 +0100, > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > I hope I addressed all review comments by now, so please pull this > > > for linux-5.6. > > > > > > A git branch with the same contents is available for testing at [1]. > > > > > > Arnd > > > > I see no issue other than the timer API patch Ben pointed. > > > > Could you resubmit that patch? Or just submit the whole as v8, I > > don't mind either way. Then we'll get this done for 5.6. > > Can you take this as a pull request? That would be ideal for me, > as I can then use it as a parent for a shared branch with additional > cleanups on top (removing time_t etc) in linux-next. It also provides > a nice place to preserve the series cover letter. > > I'm sending you the pull request now, and the last modified patch, > in case you prefer the patch over a git tag. That's fine for me. Now I pulled it to a branch for 5.6 kernel. Thanks for your patient works! Takashi