[v2,0/4] ASoC: Fix error handling in wm899x

Message

Zhang Qilong Nov. 11, 2020, 1:09 p.m. UTC

The first patch fixed a wrong free in wm8997_probe. The
remaining three patches fixed PM disable depth imbalance
on error handling.

Zhang Qilong (4):
  ASoC: arizona: Fix a wrong free in wm8997_probe
  ASoC: arizona: Fix PM disable depth imbalance on error
  ASoC: wm8994: Fix PM disable depth imbalance on error
  ASoC: wm8998: Fix PM disable depth imbalance on error

 sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c | 6 +++++-
 sound/soc/codecs/wm8997.c | 8 ++++++--
 sound/soc/codecs/wm8998.c | 4 +++-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown Nov. 12, 2020, 7:38 p.m. UTC | #1

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:09:19 +0800, Zhang Qilong wrote:
> The first patch fixed a wrong free in wm8997_probe. The
> remaining three patches fixed PM disable depth imbalance
> on error handling.
> 
> Zhang Qilong (4):
>   ASoC: arizona: Fix a wrong free in wm8997_probe
>   ASoC: arizona: Fix PM disable depth imbalance on error
>   ASoC: wm8994: Fix PM disable depth imbalance on error
>   ASoC: wm8998: Fix PM disable depth imbalance on error
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: arizona: Fix a wrong free in wm8997_probe
      commit: 5e7aace13df24ff72511f29c14ebbfe638ef733c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark