Message ID | 20220602162119.3393857-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Fixup Cirrus SX control usage | expand |
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:21:13 +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > Mostly the usage of the SX controls seems to match the lowest gain > value + number of gain levels expected. The one notable exception > there being cs53l30 as David noted. However, there are a couple of > other places where the minimum value/TLVs are slightly incorrectly > specified. > > There are two I couldn't quite work out yet, any input on these > greatly appreciated: > > [...] Applied to broonie/sound.git for-linus Thanks! [1/6] ASoC: cs42l52: Fix TLV scales for mixer controls commit: 8bf5aabf524eec61013e506f764a0b2652dc5665 [2/6] ASoC: cs35l36: Update digital volume TLV commit: 5005a2345825eb8346546d99bfe669f73111b5c5 [3/6] ASoC: cs53l30: Correct number of volume levels on SX controls commit: 7fbd6dd68127927e844912a16741016d432a0737 [4/6] ASoC: cs42l52: Correct TLV for Bypass Volume commit: 91e90c712fade0b69cdff7cc6512f6099bd18ae5 [5/6] ASoC: cs42l56: Correct typo in minimum level for SX volume controls commit: a8928ada9b96944cadd8b65d191e33199fd38782 [6/6] ASoC: cs42l51: Correct minimum value for SX volume control commit: fcb3b5a58926d16d9a338841b74af06d4c29be15 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark