[v3] ASoC: dapm: Avoid creating kcontrol for params

Commit Message

anish kumar Sept. 29, 2017, 4:52 a.m. UTC

From: anish kumar <[e-mail]>

Currently in codec to codec dai link if there are multiple
params defined then dapm can use created kcontrol to
decide which param to apply at runtime.

However, in case there is only single param configuration
then there is no point in creating the kcontrol and also there
is no point in allocating memory for kcontrol.

In the snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm function, there is memory
allocation happening for kcontrol which is later used
or not used based on num_param. It is better to not
allocate memory when there is only a single configuration.
This change is to remedy that anomaly.

Signed-off-by: anish kumar <[e-mail]>
---
Changes in this version:
 - Fixed the coding guideline comment from charles.
Changes in v2:
 - Review comments from charles to move common function of error
   handling in seperate function.
Changes in v1:
 - Included the review comments from charles regarding releasing
   memory in error path.

 sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

Comments

Charles Keepax Sept. 29, 2017, 9:09 a.m. UTC | #1

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:52:39PM -0700, [e-mail] wrote:
> From: anish kumar <[e-mail]>
> 
> Currently in codec to codec dai link if there are multiple
> params defined then dapm can use created kcontrol to
> decide which param to apply at runtime.
> 
> However, in case there is only single param configuration
> then there is no point in creating the kcontrol and also there
> is no point in allocating memory for kcontrol.
> 
> In the snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm function, there is memory
> allocation happening for kcontrol which is later used
> or not used based on num_param. It is better to not
> allocate memory when there is only a single configuration.
> This change is to remedy that anomaly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: anish kumar <[e-mail]>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <[e-mail]>
Tested-by: Charles Keepax <[e-mail]>

Thanks,
Charles

anish kumar Oct. 9, 2017, 6:29 a.m. UTC | #2

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Charles Keepax
<[e-mail]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:52:39PM -0700, [e-mail] wrote:
>> From: anish kumar <[e-mail]>
>>
>> Currently in codec to codec dai link if there are multiple
>> params defined then dapm can use created kcontrol to
>> decide which param to apply at runtime.
>>
>> However, in case there is only single param configuration
>> then there is no point in creating the kcontrol and also there
>> is no point in allocating memory for kcontrol.
>>
>> In the snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm function, there is memory
>> allocation happening for kcontrol which is later used
>> or not used based on num_param. It is better to not
>> allocate memory when there is only a single configuration.
>> This change is to remedy that anomaly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: anish kumar <[e-mail]>
>> ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <[e-mail]>
> Tested-by: Charles Keepax <[e-mail]>

Charles, do you know if there is anything pending for this series
to be picked up for merge in mark's tree?
>
> Thanks,
> Charles

Charles Keepax Oct. 9, 2017, 8:34 a.m. UTC | #3

On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 11:29:45PM -0700, anish kumar wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Charles Keepax
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:52:39PM -0700, [e-mail] wrote:
> >> From: anish kumar <[e-mail]>
> >>
> >> Currently in codec to codec dai link if there are multiple
> >> params defined then dapm can use created kcontrol to
> >> decide which param to apply at runtime.
> >>
> >> However, in case there is only single param configuration
> >> then there is no point in creating the kcontrol and also there
> >> is no point in allocating memory for kcontrol.
> >>
> >> In the snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm function, there is memory
> >> allocation happening for kcontrol which is later used
> >> or not used based on num_param. It is better to not
> >> allocate memory when there is only a single configuration.
> >> This change is to remedy that anomaly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: anish kumar <[e-mail]>
> >> ---
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <[e-mail]>
> > Tested-by: Charles Keepax <[e-mail]>
> 
> Charles, do you know if there is anything pending for this series
> to be picked up for merge in mark's tree?
> >

Its been picked up that's what that email from Mark is letting
you know. However, you do need to do an incremental patch on top
of this one for the issues the Intel build bot spotted with the
patch.

Thanks,
Charles

Mark Brown Oct. 9, 2017, 8:40 a.m. UTC | #4

On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 11:29:45PM -0700, anish kumar wrote:

> Charles, do you know if there is anything pending for this series
> to be picked up for merge in mark's tree?

Your patch was applied last week and you got an e-mail about this.

Patch

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
index d55cac6..dbf3838 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -3778,18 +3778,27 @@  static int snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card,
-			 const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params,
-			 unsigned int num_params,
-			 struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *source,
-			 struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *sink)
+void
+snd_soc_dapm_free_kcontrol(struct snd_soc_card *card,
+			unsigned long *private_value,
+			int num_params,
+			const char **w_param_text)
+{
+	int count;
+
+	devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)*private_value);
+	for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++)
+		devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)w_param_text[count]);
+	devm_kfree(card->dev, w_param_text);
+}
+
+static struct snd_kcontrol_new *
+snd_soc_dapm_alloc_kcontrol(struct snd_soc_card *card,
+			char *link_name,
+			const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params,
+			int num_params, const char **w_param_text,
+			unsigned long *private_value)
 {
-	struct snd_soc_dapm_widget template;
-	struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w;
-	char *link_name;
-	int ret, count;
-	unsigned long private_value;
-	const char **w_param_text;
 	struct soc_enum w_param_enum[] = {
 		SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(0, 0, 0, NULL),
 	};
@@ -3798,19 +3807,9 @@  int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card,
 			     snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_get,
 			     snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_put),
 	};
+	struct snd_kcontrol_new *kcontrol_news;
 	const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *config = params;
-
-	w_param_text = devm_kcalloc(card->dev, num_params,
-					sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!w_param_text)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	link_name = devm_kasprintf(card->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s",
-				   source->name, sink->name);
-	if (!link_name) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto outfree_w_param;
-	}
+	int count;
 
 	for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++) {
 		if (!config->stream_name) {
@@ -3827,47 +3826,86 @@  int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card,
 						strlen(config->stream_name) + 1,
 						GFP_KERNEL);
 		}
-		if (!w_param_text[count]) {
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto outfree_link_name;
-		}
+		if (!w_param_text[count])
+			goto outfree_w_param;
 		config++;
 	}
+
 	w_param_enum[0].items = num_params;
 	w_param_enum[0].texts = w_param_text;
 
-	memset(&template, 0, sizeof(template));
-	template.reg = SND_SOC_NOPM;
-	template.id = snd_soc_dapm_dai_link;
-	template.name = link_name;
-	template.event = snd_soc_dai_link_event;
-	template.event_flags = SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMU |
-		SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD;
-	template.num_kcontrols = 1;
-	/* duplicate w_param_enum on heap so that memory persists */
-	private_value =
+	*private_value =
 		(unsigned long) devm_kmemdup(card->dev,
 			(void *)(kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value),
 			sizeof(struct soc_enum), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!private_value) {
+	if (!*private_value) {
 		dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create control for %s widget\n",
 			link_name);
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto outfree_link_name;
+		goto outfree_w_param;
 	}
-	kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value = private_value;
+	kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value = *private_value;
 	/* duplicate kcontrol_dai_link on heap so that memory persists */
-	template.kcontrol_news =
-				devm_kmemdup(card->dev, &kcontrol_dai_link[0],
+	kcontrol_news = devm_kmemdup(card->dev, &kcontrol_dai_link[0],
 					sizeof(struct snd_kcontrol_new),
 					GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!template.kcontrol_news) {
+	if (!kcontrol_news) {
 		dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create control for %s widget\n",
 			link_name);
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto outfree_private_value;
+		goto outfree_w_param;
 	}
+	return kcontrol_news;
 
+outfree_w_param:
+	snd_soc_dapm_free_kcontrol(card, private_value, num_params, w_param_text);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card,
+			 const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params,
+			 unsigned int num_params,
+			 struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *source,
+			 struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *sink)
+{
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_widget template;
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w;
+	const char **w_param_text;
+	unsigned long private_value;
+	char *link_name;
+	int ret;
+
+	link_name = devm_kasprintf(card->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s",
+				   source->name, sink->name);
+	if (!link_name)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	memset(&template, 0, sizeof(template));
+	template.reg = SND_SOC_NOPM;
+	template.id = snd_soc_dapm_dai_link;
+	template.name = link_name;
+	template.event = snd_soc_dai_link_event;
+	template.event_flags = SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMU |
+		SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD;
+	template.kcontrol_news = NULL;
+
+	/* allocate memory for control, only in case of multiple configs */
+	if (num_params > 1) {
+		w_param_text = devm_kcalloc(card->dev, num_params,
+					sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!w_param_text) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto param_fail;
+		}
+
+		template.num_kcontrols = 1;
+		template.kcontrol_news =
+					snd_soc_dapm_alloc_kcontrol(card,
+						link_name, params, num_params,
+						w_param_text, &private_value);
+		if (!template.kcontrol_news) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto param_fail;
+		}
+	}
 	dev_dbg(card->dev, "ASoC: adding %s widget\n", link_name);
 
 	w = snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(&card->dapm, &template);
@@ -3899,15 +3937,9 @@  int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card,
 	devm_kfree(card->dev, w);
 outfree_kcontrol_news:
 	devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)template.kcontrol_news);
-outfree_private_value:
-	devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)private_value);
-outfree_link_name:
+	snd_soc_dapm_free_kcontrol(card, &private_value, num_params, w_param_text);
+param_fail:
 	devm_kfree(card->dev, link_name);
-	for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++)
-		devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)w_param_text[count]);
-outfree_w_param:
-	devm_kfree(card->dev, w_param_text);
-
 	return ret;
 }