Message ID | 1513102155-47925-1-git-send-email-biju.das@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | b0a858a47a7889757dbc9ac9872685955eaa5cc0 |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Biju Das <biju.das@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > Document r8a774[35] specific compatible strings. The Renesas RZ/G1[ME] > (r8a774[35]) sound modules are identical to the R-Car Gen2 family. > No driver change is needed as the fallback compatible string > "renesas,rcar_sound-gen2" activates the right code in the driver. > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das@bp.renesas.com> > Reviewed-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 06:09:15PM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > Document r8a774[35] specific compatible strings. The Renesas RZ/G1[ME] > (r8a774[35]) sound modules are identical to the R-Car Gen2 family. > No driver change is needed as the fallback compatible string > "renesas,rcar_sound-gen2" activates the right code in the driver. Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the subsystem. This makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches. Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
Hi Mark, On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 06:09:15PM +0000, Biju Das wrote: >> Document r8a774[35] specific compatible strings. The Renesas RZ/G1[ME] >> (r8a774[35]) sound modules are identical to the R-Car Gen2 family. >> No driver change is needed as the fallback compatible string >> "renesas,rcar_sound-gen2" activates the right code in the driver. > > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the > subsystem. This makes it easier for people to identify relevant > patches. Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are > doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're > doing. The confusing part here is that for most[*] subsystems, patches touching only DT bindings should have a "dt-bindings" prefix, while patches touching both DT bindings and driver code should have the drivers' subsystem prefix. [*] I think you're about the only maintainer who insists on patches touching only DT bindings having the drivers' subsystem prefix, which people tend to forget, if they're even aware of that rule... Can we improve this? Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:34:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The confusing part here is that for most[*] subsystems, patches touching > only DT bindings should have a "dt-bindings" prefix, while patches touching > both DT bindings and driver code should have the drivers' subsystem prefix. > [*] I think you're about the only maintainer who insists on patches touching > only DT bindings having the drivers' subsystem prefix, which people tend to > forget, if they're even aware of that rule... > Can we improve this? This is something Rob's been pushing which seems like a step back to me so I've been pushing back on it - it's causing problems for me spotting things I need to look at and later on in review (including my scripting, which does pay attention to subject lines). I suspect I'm at the upper end of people getting lots of irrelevant stuff in copy which doesn't help here.
Hi all, Thanks for the feedback, I will send a v2. Regards, Biju > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@kernel.org] > Sent: 13 December 2017 12:56 > To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> > Cc: Biju Das <biju.das@bp.renesas.com>; Liam Girdwood > <lgirdwood@gmail.com>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; Mark Rutland > <mark.rutland@arm.com>; Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>; Magnus > Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>; Chris Paterson > <Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com>; Fabrizio Castro > <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>; ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa- > devel@alsa-project.org>; Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: ASoC: rsnd: Add device tree support for > r8a774[35] > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:34:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > The confusing part here is that for most[*] subsystems, patches > > touching only DT bindings should have a "dt-bindings" prefix, while > > patches touching both DT bindings and driver code should have the drivers' > subsystem prefix. > > > [*] I think you're about the only maintainer who insists on patches > > touching only DT bindings having the drivers' subsystem prefix, which > > people tend to forget, if they're even aware of that rule... > > > Can we improve this? > > This is something Rob's been pushing which seems like a step back to me so I've > been pushing back on it - it's causing problems for me spotting things I need to > look at and later on in review (including my scripting, which does pay attention > to subject lines). I suspect I'm at the upper end of people getting lots of > irrelevant stuff in copy which doesn't help here. [https://www2.renesas.eu/media/email/unicef_2017.jpg] This Christmas, instead of sending out cards, Renesas Electronics Europe have decided to support Unicef with a donation. For further details click here<https://www.unicef.org/> to find out about the valuable work they do, helping children all over the world. We would like to take this opportunity to wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year. Renesas Electronics Europe Ltd, Dukes Meadow, Millboard Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5FH, UK. Registered in England & Wales under Registered No. 04586709.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rsnd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rsnd.txt index 085bec3..b3c28bd 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rsnd.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rsnd.txt @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Renesas R-Car sound * Modules ============================================= -Renesas R-Car sound is constructed from below modules +Renesas R-Car and RZ/G sound is constructed from below modules (for Gen2 or later) SCU : Sampling Rate Converter Unit @@ -334,9 +334,11 @@ Required properties: - compatible : "renesas,rcar_sound-<soctype>", fallbacks "renesas,rcar_sound-gen1" if generation1, and - "renesas,rcar_sound-gen2" if generation2 + "renesas,rcar_sound-gen2" if generation2 (or RZ/G1) "renesas,rcar_sound-gen3" if generation3 Examples with soctypes are: + - "renesas,rcar_sound-r8a7743" (RZ/G1M) + - "renesas,rcar_sound-r8a7745" (RZ/G1E) - "renesas,rcar_sound-r8a7778" (R-Car M1A) - "renesas,rcar_sound-r8a7779" (R-Car H1) - "renesas,rcar_sound-r8a7790" (R-Car H2)