From patchwork Tue Nov 12 10:46:42 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shengjiu Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 11239059 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9784715AB for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 10:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EEB3214E0 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 10:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="mc979ziV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9EEB3214E0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nxp.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15BD81607; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:48:36 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 15BD81607 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1573555766; bh=FT71z/GFtLa7B+E5AUYVj/ABWvWXzrDxUAJVDTAXbnc=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From; b=mc979ziVSbiXye1Ndx6ii8sHILci8zud8hLD6+FTnpWaAor5NyIAgvqmzs/Rxiups cTDIusNpcQiG7odHYyaQyJ5Iz2FGfJQC5rQZ2wmaNkkxxKK8bxRtdzi8x7fbjKseL3 jvsRxveDK+slquh805/GkMpszKxgUd5UhwuRNbbo= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670B3F8044C; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:48:35 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Delivered-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id C4052F80483; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:48:33 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on alsa1.perex.cz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from inva020.nxp.com (inva020.nxp.com [92.121.34.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A17F802E0 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:48:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 75A17F802E0 Received: from inva020.nxp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inva020.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078211A06E6; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:48:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com [165.114.16.14]) by inva020.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124321A0324; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:48:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (shlinux2.ap.freescale.net [10.192.224.44]) by invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF254024E; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 18:48:22 +0800 (SGT) From: Shengjiu Wang To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 18:46:42 +0800 Message-Id: <1573555602-5403-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] Revert "ASoC: soc-pcm: check symmetry after hw_params" X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" This reverts commit 957ce0c6b8a1f26559864507ae0bfcba29d924ad. That commit cause soc_pcm_params_symmetry can't take effect. cpu_dai->rate, cpu_dai->channels and cpu_dai->sample_bits are updated in the middle of soc_pcm_hw_params, so move soc_pcm_params_symmetry to the end of soc_pcm_hw_params is not a good solution, for judgement of symmetry in the function is always true. FIXME: According to the comments of that commit, I think the case described in the commit should disable symmetric_rates in Back-End, rather than changing the position of soc_pcm_params_symmetry. Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 8655df6a6089..b7800c95327a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -861,6 +861,11 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int i, ret = 0; mutex_lock_nested(&rtd->card->pcm_mutex, rtd->card->pcm_subclass); + + ret = soc_pcm_params_symmetry(substream, params); + if (ret) + goto out; + if (rtd->dai_link->ops->hw_params) { ret = rtd->dai_link->ops->hw_params(substream, params); if (ret < 0) { @@ -940,9 +945,6 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, } component = NULL; - ret = soc_pcm_params_symmetry(substream, params); - if (ret) - goto component_err; out: mutex_unlock(&rtd->card->pcm_mutex); return ret;