Message ID | 20150409090239.GA17605@mwanda (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 75afbd052b3675e9b812f9327e19be63f3e7b5de |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:02:39PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > My static checker complains about these because it looks like the > multiply can overflow and then we cast to a larger data type. I don't > think this is a problem, but it's also harmless to do the cast earlier > so let's silence the static checker warning. Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c index 718838b..7b50a9d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static int sst_cdev_tstamp(struct device *dev, unsigned int str_id, tstamp->copied_total = fw_tstamp.ring_buffer_counter; tstamp->pcm_frames = fw_tstamp.frames_decoded; tstamp->pcm_io_frames = div_u64(fw_tstamp.hardware_counter, - (u64)((stream->num_ch) * SST_GET_BYTES_PER_SAMPLE(24))); + (u64)stream->num_ch * SST_GET_BYTES_PER_SAMPLE(24)); tstamp->sampling_rate = fw_tstamp.sampling_frequency; dev_dbg(dev, "PCM = %u\n", tstamp->pcm_io_frames);
My static checker complains about these because it looks like the multiply can overflow and then we cast to a larger data type. I don't think this is a problem, but it's also harmless to do the cast earlier so let's silence the static checker warning. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>