@@ -364,10 +364,6 @@ static int dapm_kcontrol_data_alloc(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *widget,
ret = PTR_ERR(data->widget);
goto err_data;
}
- if (!data->widget) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_data;
- }
}
break;
case snd_soc_dapm_demux:
@@ -402,10 +398,6 @@ static int dapm_kcontrol_data_alloc(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *widget,
ret = PTR_ERR(data->widget);
goto err_data;
}
- if (!data->widget) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_data;
- }
snd_soc_dapm_add_path(widget->dapm, data->widget,
widget, NULL, NULL);
@@ -3433,23 +3425,8 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
mutex_lock_nested(&dapm->card->dapm_mutex, SND_SOC_DAPM_CLASS_RUNTIME);
w = snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(dapm, widget);
- /* Do not nag about probe deferrals */
- if (IS_ERR(w)) {
- int ret = PTR_ERR(w);
-
- if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
- dev_err(dapm->dev,
- "ASoC: Failed to create DAPM control %s (%d)\n",
- widget->name, ret);
- goto out_unlock;
- }
- if (!w)
- dev_err(dapm->dev,
- "ASoC: Failed to create DAPM control %s\n",
- widget->name);
-
-out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&dapm->card->dapm_mutex);
+
return w;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_new_control);
@@ -3464,24 +3441,20 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
int ret;
if ((w = dapm_cnew_widget(widget)) == NULL)
- return NULL;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
switch (w->id) {
case snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply:
w->regulator = devm_regulator_get(dapm->dev, w->name);
if (IS_ERR(w->regulator)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(w->regulator);
- if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
- dev_err(dapm->dev, "ASoC: Failed to request %s: %d\n",
- w->name, ret);
- return NULL;
+ goto request_failed;
}
if (w->on_val & SND_SOC_DAPM_REGULATOR_BYPASS) {
ret = regulator_allow_bypass(w->regulator, true);
if (ret != 0)
- dev_warn(w->dapm->dev,
+ dev_warn(dapm->dev,
"ASoC: Failed to bypass %s: %d\n",
w->name, ret);
}
@@ -3490,22 +3463,14 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
w->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(dapm->dev);
if (IS_ERR(w->pinctrl)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(w->pinctrl);
- if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
- dev_err(dapm->dev, "ASoC: Failed to request %s: %d\n",
- w->name, ret);
- return NULL;
+ goto request_failed;
}
break;
case snd_soc_dapm_clock_supply:
w->clk = devm_clk_get(dapm->dev, w->name);
if (IS_ERR(w->clk)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(w->clk);
- if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
- dev_err(dapm->dev, "ASoC: Failed to request %s: %d\n",
- w->name, ret);
- return NULL;
+ goto request_failed;
}
break;
default:
@@ -3519,7 +3484,7 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
w->name = kstrdup_const(widget->name, GFP_KERNEL);
if (w->name == NULL) {
kfree(w);
- return NULL;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
switch (w->id) {
@@ -3596,6 +3561,13 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
/* machine layer sets up unconnected pins and insertions */
w->connected = 1;
return w;
+
+request_failed:
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(dapm->dev, "ASoC: Failed to request %s: %d\n",
+ w->name, ret);
+
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
/**
@@ -3621,19 +3593,6 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_controls(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
w = snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(dapm, widget);
if (IS_ERR(w)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(w);
- /* Do not nag about probe deferrals */
- if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- break;
- dev_err(dapm->dev,
- "ASoC: Failed to create DAPM control %s (%d)\n",
- widget->name, ret);
- break;
- }
- if (!w) {
- dev_err(dapm->dev,
- "ASoC: Failed to create DAPM control %s\n",
- widget->name);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
break;
}
widget++;
@@ -3944,21 +3903,8 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card,
dev_dbg(card->dev, "ASoC: adding %s widget\n", link_name);
w = snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(&card->dapm, &template);
- if (IS_ERR(w)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(w);
- /* Do not nag about probe deferrals */
- if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
- dev_err(card->dev,
- "ASoC: Failed to create %s widget (%d)\n",
- link_name, ret);
- goto outfree_kcontrol_news;
- }
- if (!w) {
- dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create %s widget\n",
- link_name);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
+ if (IS_ERR(w))
goto outfree_kcontrol_news;
- }
w->params = params;
w->num_params = num_params;
@@ -3999,21 +3945,8 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_dai_widgets(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
template.name);
w = snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(dapm, &template);
- if (IS_ERR(w)) {
- int ret = PTR_ERR(w);
-
- /* Do not nag about probe deferrals */
- if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
- dev_err(dapm->dev,
- "ASoC: Failed to create %s widget (%d)\n",
- dai->driver->playback.stream_name, ret);
- return ret;
- }
- if (!w) {
- dev_err(dapm->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create %s widget\n",
- dai->driver->playback.stream_name);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(w))
+ return PTR_ERR(w);
w->priv = dai;
dai->playback_widget = w;
@@ -4028,21 +3961,8 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_dai_widgets(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
template.name);
w = snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(dapm, &template);
- if (IS_ERR(w)) {
- int ret = PTR_ERR(w);
-
- /* Do not nag about probe deferrals */
- if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
- dev_err(dapm->dev,
- "ASoC: Failed to create %s widget (%d)\n",
- dai->driver->playback.stream_name, ret);
- return ret;
- }
- if (!w) {
- dev_err(dapm->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create %s widget\n",
- dai->driver->capture.stream_name);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(w))
+ return PTR_ERR(w);
w->priv = dai;
dai->capture_widget = w;
@@ -1565,17 +1565,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_dapm_widget_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
widget = snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(dapm, &template);
if (IS_ERR(widget)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(widget);
- /* Do not nag about probe deferrals */
- if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
- dev_err(tplg->dev,
- "ASoC: failed to create widget %s controls (%d)\n",
- w->name, ret);
- goto hdr_err;
- }
- if (widget == NULL) {
- dev_err(tplg->dev, "ASoC: failed to create widget %s controls\n",
- w->name);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
goto hdr_err;
}
Currently DAPM has a lot of similar code to handle errors from snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked, and much of this code does not really accurately reflect what the function returns. Firstly, most places will check for a return value of -EPROBE_DEFER and silence any error messages in that case. The one notable exception here being dapm_kcontrol_data_alloc which does currently print any error messages in the case of snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked returning NULL or an error. Additionally the error prints being silenced in these case are redundant as snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked can only return -EPROBE_DEFER or NULL when failing. Secondly, most places will treat a return value of NULL as an -ENOMEM. This is not correct either since any error except EPROBE_DEFER will cause a return value of NULL from snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked. Centralise this handling and the error messages within snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked and update the callers to simply check IS_ERR and return. Note that this update is slightly simpler in the case of dapm_kcontrol_data_alloc where that is fairly close to the handling that was already in place. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> --- Changes since v1: - Improved the commit message to be a more descriptive of the change Thanks, Charles sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 118 ++++++++--------------------------------------- sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 11 ----- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)