diff mbox series

[v2] ALSA: dmaengine_pcm: Consider DMA cache caused delay in pointer callback

Message ID 20200210151402.29634-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit fa1f875c120fa44572c561d86022af2f6b0774c7
Headers show
Series [v2] ALSA: dmaengine_pcm: Consider DMA cache caused delay in pointer callback | expand

Commit Message

Peter Ujfalusi Feb. 10, 2020, 3:14 p.m. UTC
Some DMA engines can have big FIFOs which adds to the latency.
The DMAengine framework can report the FIFO utilization in bytes. Use this
information for the delay reporting.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
---
Hi,

Changes since v1:
- use bytes_to_frames() for the DMA delay calculation
- Drop changes to soc-pcm

5.6-rc1 now have support for reporting the DMA cached data.
With this patch we can include it to the delay calculation.
The first DMA driver which reports this is the TI K3 UDMA driver.

Regards,
Peter

 sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Takashi Iwai Feb. 10, 2020, 3:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:14:02 +0100,
Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> 
> Some DMA engines can have big FIFOs which adds to the latency.
> The DMAengine framework can report the FIFO utilization in bytes. Use this
> information for the delay reporting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
> Hi,
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - use bytes_to_frames() for the DMA delay calculation
> - Drop changes to soc-pcm
> 
> 5.6-rc1 now have support for reporting the DMA cached data.
> With this patch we can include it to the delay calculation.
> The first DMA driver which reports this is the TI K3 UDMA driver.
> 
> Regards,
> Peter
> 
>  sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c b/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
> index 5749a8a49784..d8be7b488162 100644
> --- a/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
> +++ b/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
> @@ -247,9 +247,14 @@ snd_pcm_uframes_t snd_dmaengine_pcm_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>  
>  	status = dmaengine_tx_status(prtd->dma_chan, prtd->cookie, &state);
>  	if (status == DMA_IN_PROGRESS || status == DMA_PAUSED) {
> +		struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime;
> +
>  		buf_size = snd_pcm_lib_buffer_bytes(substream);
>  		if (state.residue > 0 && state.residue <= buf_size)
>  			pos = buf_size - state.residue;
> +
> +		runtime->delay = bytes_to_frames(runtime,
> +						 state.in_flight_bytes);

Another call of bytes_to_frames() below...

>  	}
>  
>  	return bytes_to_frames(substream->runtime, pos);

... refers to substream->runtime.
Better to align both places, either runtime or substream->runtime.

With that minor nitpick, the change looks good:
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>


thanks,

Takashi
Peter Ujfalusi Feb. 10, 2020, 3:26 p.m. UTC | #2
On 10/02/2020 17.23, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:14:02 +0100,
> Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>
>> Some DMA engines can have big FIFOs which adds to the latency.
>> The DMAengine framework can report the FIFO utilization in bytes. Use this
>> information for the delay reporting.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - use bytes_to_frames() for the DMA delay calculation
>> - Drop changes to soc-pcm
>>
>> 5.6-rc1 now have support for reporting the DMA cached data.
>> With this patch we can include it to the delay calculation.
>> The first DMA driver which reports this is the TI K3 UDMA driver.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>>
>>  sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c b/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
>> index 5749a8a49784..d8be7b488162 100644
>> --- a/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
>> +++ b/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
>> @@ -247,9 +247,14 @@ snd_pcm_uframes_t snd_dmaengine_pcm_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>>  
>>  	status = dmaengine_tx_status(prtd->dma_chan, prtd->cookie, &state);
>>  	if (status == DMA_IN_PROGRESS || status == DMA_PAUSED) {
>> +		struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime;
>> +
>>  		buf_size = snd_pcm_lib_buffer_bytes(substream);
>>  		if (state.residue > 0 && state.residue <= buf_size)
>>  			pos = buf_size - state.residue;
>> +
>> +		runtime->delay = bytes_to_frames(runtime,
>> +						 state.in_flight_bytes);
> 
> Another call of bytes_to_frames() below...
> 
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	return bytes_to_frames(substream->runtime, pos);
> 
> ... refers to substream->runtime.
> Better to align both places, either runtime or substream->runtime.

Sure, I'll use the runtime as with substream->runtime the delay part is
not nicely wrapping.

> With that minor nitpick, the change looks good:
> Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
> 

- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c b/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
index 5749a8a49784..d8be7b488162 100644
--- a/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
@@ -247,9 +247,14 @@  snd_pcm_uframes_t snd_dmaengine_pcm_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
 
 	status = dmaengine_tx_status(prtd->dma_chan, prtd->cookie, &state);
 	if (status == DMA_IN_PROGRESS || status == DMA_PAUSED) {
+		struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime;
+
 		buf_size = snd_pcm_lib_buffer_bytes(substream);
 		if (state.residue > 0 && state.residue <= buf_size)
 			pos = buf_size - state.residue;
+
+		runtime->delay = bytes_to_frames(runtime,
+						 state.in_flight_bytes);
 	}
 
 	return bytes_to_frames(substream->runtime, pos);