| Message ID | 20221130000608.519574-6-broonie@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | kselftest/alsa: pcm-test improvements | expand |
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c index bc0cb3c481f2..614ccc52cece 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c @@ -516,9 +516,9 @@ static void test_pcm_time1(struct pcm_data *data, } static const struct time_test_def time_tests[] = { - /* name format rate chan period buffer */ - { "test.time1", "S16_LE", 48000, 2, 512, 4096 }, - { "test.time2", "S16_LE", 48000, 2, 24000, 192000 }, + /* name format rate chan period buffer */ + { "S16.48k.2.small", "S16_LE", 48000, 2, 512, 4096 }, + { "S16.48k.2.big", "S16_LE", 48000, 2, 24000, 192000 }, }; int main(void)
Rather than just numbering the tests try to provide semi descriptive names for what the tests are trying to cover. This also has the advantage of meaning we can add more tests without having to keep the list of tests ordered by existing number which should make it easier to understand what we're testing and why. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)