Message ID | 20231026113549.1897368-1-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 79323dc80318aab6c2d05abdbcf88f09b50522c5 |
Headers | show |
Series | ASoC: dapm: Simplify widget clone | expand |
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 01:35:49PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: > New DAPM widgets are created based on a provided template. When cloning > the data, the name and stream name also need to be cloned. Currently the > data and the names are initialized in different places. Simplify the > code by having entire initialization in one place. > > Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Thanks, Charles
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:35:49 +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: > New DAPM widgets are created based on a provided template. When cloning > the data, the name and stream name also need to be cloned. Currently the > data and the names are initialized in different places. Simplify the > code by having entire initialization in one place. > > Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: dapm: Simplify widget clone commit: 79323dc80318aab6c2d05abdbcf88f09b50522c5 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c index 4e2beda6f9bf..b0503bf050db 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c @@ -320,7 +320,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dapm_mark_endpoints_dirty); /* create a new dapm widget */ static inline struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *dapm_cnew_widget( - const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *_widget) + const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *_widget, + const char *prefix) { struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w; @@ -328,13 +329,19 @@ static inline struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *dapm_cnew_widget( if (!w) return NULL; - /* - * w->name is duplicated in caller, but w->sname isn't. - * Duplicate it here if defined - */ + if (prefix) + w->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s %s", prefix, _widget->name); + else + w->name = kstrdup_const(_widget->name, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!w->name) { + kfree(w); + return NULL; + } + if (_widget->sname) { w->sname = kstrdup_const(_widget->sname, GFP_KERNEL); if (!w->sname) { + kfree_const(w->name); kfree(w); return NULL; } @@ -3629,20 +3636,12 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm, { enum snd_soc_dapm_direction dir; struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w; - const char *prefix; int ret = -ENOMEM; - if ((w = dapm_cnew_widget(widget)) == NULL) + w = dapm_cnew_widget(widget, soc_dapm_prefix(dapm)); + if (!w) goto cnew_failed; - prefix = soc_dapm_prefix(dapm); - if (prefix) - w->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s %s", prefix, widget->name); - else - w->name = kstrdup_const(widget->name, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!w->name) - goto name_failed; - switch (w->id) { case snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply: w->regulator = devm_regulator_get(dapm->dev, widget->name); @@ -3767,7 +3766,6 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm, dev_err_probe(dapm->dev, ret, "ASoC: Failed to request %s\n", w->name); kfree_const(w->name); -name_failed: kfree_const(w->sname); kfree(w); cnew_failed: