diff mbox series

[1/3] ALSA: pcm: Add missing formats to formats list

Message ID 20240125223522.1122765-1-ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit f7c4cb4a3f77867612b45c6327f80eac58a8ce65
Headers show
Series [1/3] ALSA: pcm: Add missing formats to formats list | expand

Commit Message

Ivan Orlov Jan. 25, 2024, 10:35 p.m. UTC
Add 4 missing formats to 'snd_pcm_format_names' array in order to be
able to get their names with 'snd_pcm_format_name' function.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>
---
 sound/core/pcm.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Amadeusz Sławiński Jan. 26, 2024, 9:01 a.m. UTC | #1
On 1/25/2024 11:35 PM, Ivan Orlov wrote:
> Add 4 missing formats to 'snd_pcm_format_names' array in order to be
> able to get their names with 'snd_pcm_format_name' function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>
> ---
>   sound/core/pcm.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm.c b/sound/core/pcm.c
> index a09f0154e6a7..d0788126cbab 100644
> --- a/sound/core/pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/core/pcm.c
> @@ -211,6 +211,10 @@ static const char * const snd_pcm_format_names[] = {
>   	FORMAT(DSD_U32_LE),
>   	FORMAT(DSD_U16_BE),
>   	FORMAT(DSD_U32_BE),
> +	FORMAT(S20_LE),
> +	FORMAT(S20_BE),
> +	FORMAT(U20_LE),
> +	FORMAT(U20_BE),
>   };
>   
>   /**

Maybe we can also add some kind of static_assert to check at compile 
time that all formats are handled, something like:
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(snd_pcm_format_names) == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST 
+ 1);

Although looking at definitions there is a hole between 
SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_U20_BE & SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_SPECIAL, which will cause 
this idea to fail.

Perhaps with comment:
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(snd_pcm_format_names) == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST 
+ 1 - 2); /* -2 for formats reserved for future use */
?
Takashi Iwai Jan. 30, 2024, 1:15 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 23:35:19 +0100,
Ivan Orlov wrote:
> 
> Add 4 missing formats to 'snd_pcm_format_names' array in order to be
> able to get their names with 'snd_pcm_format_name' function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>

Now applied all three patches.  This first one is to for-linus, while
the rest two are to for-next for 6.9 kernel.

For further improvements (e.g. Amadeusz suggested), let's apply on top
of that.


thanks,

Takashi
Ivan Orlov Jan. 31, 2024, 5:41 p.m. UTC | #3
On 1/26/24 09:01, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> On 1/25/2024 11:35 PM, Ivan Orlov wrote:
>> Add 4 missing formats to 'snd_pcm_format_names' array in order to be
>> able to get their names with 'snd_pcm_format_name' function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   sound/core/pcm.c | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm.c b/sound/core/pcm.c
>> index a09f0154e6a7..d0788126cbab 100644
>> --- a/sound/core/pcm.c
>> +++ b/sound/core/pcm.c
>> @@ -211,6 +211,10 @@ static const char * const snd_pcm_format_names[] = {
>>       FORMAT(DSD_U32_LE),
>>       FORMAT(DSD_U16_BE),
>>       FORMAT(DSD_U32_BE),
>> +    FORMAT(S20_LE),
>> +    FORMAT(S20_BE),
>> +    FORMAT(U20_LE),
>> +    FORMAT(U20_BE),
>>   };
>>   /**
> 
> Maybe we can also add some kind of static_assert to check at compile 
> time that all formats are handled, something like:
> static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(snd_pcm_format_names) == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST 
> + 1);
> 
> Although looking at definitions there is a hole between 
> SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_U20_BE & SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_SPECIAL, which will cause 
> this idea to fail.
> 
> Perhaps with comment:
> static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(snd_pcm_format_names) == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST 
> + 1 - 2); /* -2 for formats reserved for future use */
> ?

Hi Amadeusz,

Thank you for the review and sorry for the late answer. Yes, I believe 
it could be a nice improvement! Could I send a patch and specify you in 
Suggested-by tag?
Ivan Orlov Jan. 31, 2024, 5:42 p.m. UTC | #4
On 1/30/24 13:15, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 23:35:19 +0100,
> Ivan Orlov wrote:
>>
>> Add 4 missing formats to 'snd_pcm_format_names' array in order to be
>> able to get their names with 'snd_pcm_format_name' function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>
> 
> Now applied all three patches.  This first one is to for-linus, while
> the rest two are to for-next for 6.9 kernel.
> 
> For further improvements (e.g. Amadeusz suggested), let's apply on top
> of that.
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi

Hi Takashi,

Thank you for applying this changes! I'll send the patch with the 
improvements suggested by Amadeusz as soon as possible.
Amadeusz Sławiński Feb. 1, 2024, 8:54 a.m. UTC | #5
On 1/31/2024 6:41 PM, Ivan Orlov wrote:
> On 1/26/24 09:01, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
>> On 1/25/2024 11:35 PM, Ivan Orlov wrote:
>>> Add 4 missing formats to 'snd_pcm_format_names' array in order to be
>>> able to get their names with 'snd_pcm_format_name' function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>   sound/core/pcm.c | 4 ++++
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm.c b/sound/core/pcm.c
>>> index a09f0154e6a7..d0788126cbab 100644
>>> --- a/sound/core/pcm.c
>>> +++ b/sound/core/pcm.c
>>> @@ -211,6 +211,10 @@ static const char * const snd_pcm_format_names[] 
>>> = {
>>>       FORMAT(DSD_U32_LE),
>>>       FORMAT(DSD_U16_BE),
>>>       FORMAT(DSD_U32_BE),
>>> +    FORMAT(S20_LE),
>>> +    FORMAT(S20_BE),
>>> +    FORMAT(U20_LE),
>>> +    FORMAT(U20_BE),
>>>   };
>>>   /**
>>
>> Maybe we can also add some kind of static_assert to check at compile 
>> time that all formats are handled, something like:
>> static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(snd_pcm_format_names) == 
>> SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST + 1);
>>
>> Although looking at definitions there is a hole between 
>> SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_U20_BE & SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_SPECIAL, which will cause 
>> this idea to fail.
>>
>> Perhaps with comment:
>> static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(snd_pcm_format_names) == 
>> SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST + 1 - 2); /* -2 for formats reserved for future 
>> use */
>> ?
> 
> Hi Amadeusz,
> 
> Thank you for the review and sorry for the late answer. Yes, I believe 
> it could be a nice improvement! Could I send a patch and specify you in 
> Suggested-by tag?
> 

Hi,

yes, go for it!

Amadeusz
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/sound/core/pcm.c b/sound/core/pcm.c
index a09f0154e6a7..d0788126cbab 100644
--- a/sound/core/pcm.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm.c
@@ -211,6 +211,10 @@  static const char * const snd_pcm_format_names[] = {
 	FORMAT(DSD_U32_LE),
 	FORMAT(DSD_U16_BE),
 	FORMAT(DSD_U32_BE),
+	FORMAT(S20_LE),
+	FORMAT(S20_BE),
+	FORMAT(U20_LE),
+	FORMAT(U20_BE),
 };
 
 /**