Message ID | 20240216130050.3786789-1-arnd@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | ALSA: core: fix buffer overflow in test_format_fill_silence() | expand |
On 2/16/24 13:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > KASAN caught a buffer overflow with the hardcoded 2048 byte buffer > size, when 2080 bytes are written to it: > > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in snd_pcm_format_set_silence+0x3bc/0x3e4 > Write of size 8 at addr ffff0000c8149800 by task kunit_try_catch/1297 > > CPU: 0 PID: 1297 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G N 6.8.0-rc4-next-20240216 #1 > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) > Call trace: > kasan_report+0x78/0xc0 > __asan_report_store_n_noabort+0x1c/0x28 > snd_pcm_format_set_silence+0x3bc/0x3e4 > _test_fill_silence+0xdc/0x298 > test_format_fill_silence+0x110/0x228 > kunit_try_run_case+0x144/0x3bc > kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x50/0x94 > kthread+0x330/0x3e8 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > Allocated by task 1297: > __kmalloc+0x17c/0x2f0 > kunit_kmalloc_array+0x2c/0x78 > test_format_fill_silence+0xcc/0x228 > kunit_try_run_case+0x144/0x3bc > kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x50/0x94 > kthread+0x330/0x3e8 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > Replace the incorrect size with the correct length of 260 64-bit samples. > > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> > Fixes: 3e39acf56ede ("ALSA: core: Add sound core KUnit test") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > Naresh, I slightly changed the patch to make the computation more obvious, > can you test again to make sure I got this right? > --- > sound/core/sound_kunit.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/sound/core/sound_kunit.c b/sound/core/sound_kunit.c > index 5d5a7bf88de4..7f16101ece7a 100644 > --- a/sound/core/sound_kunit.c > +++ b/sound/core/sound_kunit.c > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > #include <sound/core.h> > #include <sound/pcm.h> > > -#define SILENCE_BUFFER_SIZE 2048 > +#define SILENCE_BUFFER_SIZE (sizeof(u64) * 260) I believe it would be good to define FILL_SILENCE_MAX_FRAMES to 260, update the 'buf_samples' array correspondingly and define the SILENCE_BUFFER_SIZE as (sizeof(u64) * FILL_SILENCE_MAX_FRAMES), so it would be more clear where '260' came from. Thank you for fixing this!
diff --git a/sound/core/sound_kunit.c b/sound/core/sound_kunit.c index 5d5a7bf88de4..7f16101ece7a 100644 --- a/sound/core/sound_kunit.c +++ b/sound/core/sound_kunit.c @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ #include <sound/core.h> #include <sound/pcm.h> -#define SILENCE_BUFFER_SIZE 2048 +#define SILENCE_BUFFER_SIZE (sizeof(u64) * 260) #define SILENCE(...) { __VA_ARGS__ } #define DEFINE_FORMAT(fmt, pbits, wd, endianness, signd, silence_arr) { \ .format = SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_##fmt, .physical_bits = pbits, \