@@ -1251,7 +1251,10 @@ void snd_soc_close_delayed_work(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd);
/* mixer control */
struct soc_mixer_control {
- int min, max, platform_max;
+ /* Minimum and maximum specified as written to the hardware */
+ int min, max;
+ /* Limited maximum value specified as presented through the control */
+ int platform_max;
int reg, rreg;
unsigned int shift, rshift;
u32 num_channels;
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ int snd_soc_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] < 0)
return -EINVAL;
val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
- if (mc->platform_max && ((int)val + min) > mc->platform_max)
+ if (mc->platform_max && val > mc->platform_max)
return -EINVAL;
if (val > max - min)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ int snd_soc_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[1] < 0)
return -EINVAL;
val2 = ucontrol->value.integer.value[1];
- if (mc->platform_max && ((int)val2 + min) > mc->platform_max)
+ if (mc->platform_max && val2 > mc->platform_max)
return -EINVAL;
if (val2 > max - min)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -491,17 +491,16 @@ int snd_soc_info_volsw_range(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
{
struct soc_mixer_control *mc =
(struct soc_mixer_control *)kcontrol->private_value;
- int platform_max;
- int min = mc->min;
+ int max;
- if (!mc->platform_max)
- mc->platform_max = mc->max;
- platform_max = mc->platform_max;
+ max = mc->max - mc->min;
+ if (mc->platform_max && mc->platform_max < max)
+ max = mc->platform_max;
uinfo->type = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_TYPE_INTEGER;
uinfo->count = snd_soc_volsw_is_stereo(mc) ? 2 : 1;
uinfo->value.integer.min = 0;
- uinfo->value.integer.max = platform_max - min;
+ uinfo->value.integer.max = max;
return 0;
}
This reverts commit 9bdd10d57a88 ("ASoC: ops: Shift tested values in snd_soc_put_volsw() by +min"), and makes some additional related updates. There are two ways the platform_max could be interpreted; the maximum register value, or the maximum value the control can be set to. The patch moved from treating the value as a control value to a register one. When the patch was applied it was technically correct as snd_soc_limit_volume() also used the register interpretation. However, even then most of the other usages treated platform_max as a control value, and snd_soc_limit_volume() has since been updated to also do so in commit fb9ad24485087 ("ASoC: ops: add correct range check for limiting volume"). That patch however, missed updating snd_soc_put_volsw() back to the control interpretation, and fixing snd_soc_info_volsw_range(). The control interpretation makes more sense as limiting is typically done from the machine driver, so it is appropriate to use the customer facing representation rather than the internal codec representation. Update all the code to consistently use this interpretation of platform_max. Finally, also add some comments to the soc_mixer_control struct to hopefully avoid further patches switching between the two approaches. Fixes: fb9ad24485087 ("ASoC: ops: add correct range check for limiting volume") Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> --- Note v1 was under the slightly different title of: ASoC: ops: Revert addition of min whilst checking platform max Changes since v1: - Also updated the code in snd_soc_info_volsw_range. - Minor tweaks to the commit message to reflect there were actually 2 places still using the incorrect interpretation of platform_max. Thanks, Charles include/sound/soc.h | 5 ++++- sound/soc/soc-ops.c | 15 +++++++-------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)