| Message ID | 1569223201-1490-5-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Enable virtual time-based airtime scheduler support on ath10k | expand |
Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org> writes: > Global airtime weight sum is updated only when txq is added/removed > from rbtree. If upper layer configures sta weight during high load, > airtime weight sum will not be updated since txq is most likely on the > tree. It could a little late for upper layer to reconfigure sta weight > when txq is already in the rbtree. And thus, incorrect airtime weight sum > will lead to incorrect global virtual time calculation as well as overflow > of airtime weight sum during txq removed. > > Hence, need to update airtime weight sum upon receiving event for > configuring sta weight once sta's txq is on the rbtree. > > Besides, if airtime weight sum of ACs and sta weight is synced under the > same per AC lock protection, there can be a very short window causing > incorrct airtime weight sum calculation as below: > > active_txq_lock_VO . > VO weight sum is syncd . > sta airtime weight sum is synced . > active_txq_unlock_VO . > . . > active_txq_lock_VI . > VI weight sum is syncd . > sta airtime weight sum active_txq_lock_BE > active_txq_unlock_VI Remove txq and thus sum > . is calculated with synced > . sta airtime weight > . active_txq_unlock_BE > > So introduce a per ac synced station airtime weight synced with per > AC synced weight sum together. And the per-AC station airtime weight > is used to calculate weight sum. > > Signed-off-by: Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org> > --- > net/mac80211/cfg.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c | 2 +- > net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 9 ++++----- > net/mac80211/sta_info.h | 5 +++-- > net/mac80211/tx.c | 4 ++-- > 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c > index d65aa01..c8a0683 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c > @@ -1284,7 +1284,8 @@ static int sta_apply_parameters(struct ieee80211_local *local, > int ret = 0; > struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband; > struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = sta->sdata; > - u32 mask, set; > + u32 mask, set, tid, ac, pre_weight; > + struct txq_info *txqi; > > sband = ieee80211_get_sband(sdata); > if (!sband) > @@ -1452,8 +1453,30 @@ static int sta_apply_parameters(struct ieee80211_local *local, > if (ieee80211_vif_is_mesh(&sdata->vif)) > sta_apply_mesh_params(local, sta, params); > > - if (params->airtime_weight) > - sta->airtime_weight = params->airtime_weight; > + if (params->airtime_weight && > + params->airtime_weight != sta->airtime_weight) { This check doesn't work I think? You're not using the array-based sta->airtime_weight[], and there are locking issues by just checking like this; so maybe just keep the if() on params->airtime_weight, and do the checking inside the loop while holding the lock? Or could we just turn the weights into atomics to avoid the locking entirely? > + for (ac = 0; ac < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; ac++) { > + spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]); > + for (tid = 0; tid < IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS + 1; tid++) { > + if (!sta->sta.txq[tid] || > + ac != ieee80211_ac_from_tid(tid)) > + continue; > + > + pre_weight = sta->airtime_weight[ac]; > + sta->airtime_weight[ac] = > + params->airtime_weight; > + > + txqi = to_txq_info(sta->sta.txq[tid]); > + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order)) > + continue; > + > + local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] = local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] + > + params->airtime_weight - > + pre_weight; > + } > + spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]); > + } > + } > > /* set the STA state after all sta info from usermode has been set */ > if (test_sta_flag(sta, WLAN_STA_TDLS_PEER) || > diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c > index 80028da..43a7e6a 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static ssize_t sta_airtime_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf, > "Virt-T: VO: %lld us VI: %lld us BE: %lld us BK: %lld us\n", > rx_airtime, > tx_airtime, > - sta->airtime_weight, > + sta->airtime_weight[0], > v_t[0], > v_t[1], > v_t[2], > diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c > index feac975..e599cf1 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c > @@ -384,11 +384,10 @@ struct sta_info *sta_info_alloc(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, > if (sta_prepare_rate_control(local, sta, gfp)) > goto free_txq; > > - sta->airtime_weight = IEEE80211_DEFAULT_AIRTIME_WEIGHT; > - > for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; i++) { > skb_queue_head_init(&sta->ps_tx_buf[i]); > skb_queue_head_init(&sta->tx_filtered[i]); > + sta->airtime_weight[i] = IEEE80211_DEFAULT_AIRTIME_WEIGHT; > } > > for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS; i++) > @@ -1850,11 +1849,11 @@ void ieee80211_sta_register_airtime(struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta, u8 tid, > sta->airtime[ac].tx_airtime += tx_airtime; > sta->airtime[ac].rx_airtime += rx_airtime; > > - weight_sum = local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] ?: sta->airtime_weight; > + weight_sum = local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] ?: sta->airtime_weight[ac]; > > /* Round the calculation of global vt */ > local->airtime_v_t[ac] += (airtime + (weight_sum >> 1)) / weight_sum; > - sta->airtime[ac].v_t += airtime / sta->airtime_weight; > + sta->airtime[ac].v_t += airtime / sta->airtime_weight[ac]; > ieee80211_resort_txq(&local->hw, txq); > > spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]); > @@ -2236,7 +2235,7 @@ void sta_set_sinfo(struct sta_info *sta, struct station_info *sinfo, > } > > if (!(sinfo->filled & BIT_ULL(NL80211_STA_INFO_AIRTIME_WEIGHT))) { > - sinfo->airtime_weight = sta->airtime_weight; > + sinfo->airtime_weight = sta->airtime_weight[0]; > sinfo->filled |= BIT_ULL(NL80211_STA_INFO_AIRTIME_WEIGHT); > } > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.h b/net/mac80211/sta_info.h > index 5055f94..2697343 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.h > +++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.h > @@ -476,7 +476,8 @@ struct ieee80211_sta_rx_stats { > * @tid_seq: per-TID sequence numbers for sending to this STA > * @airtime: per-AC struct airtime_info describing airtime statistics for this > * station > - * @airtime_weight: station weight for airtime fairness calculation purposes > + * @airtime_weight: station per-AC weight for airtime fairness calculation > + * purposes > * @ampdu_mlme: A-MPDU state machine state > * @mesh: mesh STA information > * @debugfs_dir: debug filesystem directory dentry > @@ -602,7 +603,7 @@ struct sta_info { > u16 tid_seq[IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_TID_MASK + 1]; > > struct airtime_info airtime[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS]; > - u16 airtime_weight; > + u16 airtime_weight[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS]; > > /* > * Aggregation information, locked with lock. > diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c > index 60cf569..286cf14 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/tx.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c > @@ -3735,7 +3735,7 @@ void ieee80211_schedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, > struct sta_info *sta = container_of(txq->sta, > struct sta_info, sta); > > - local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] += sta->airtime_weight; > + local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] += sta->airtime_weight[ac]; > if (local->airtime_v_t[ac] > AIRTIME_GRACE) > sta->airtime[ac].v_t = max(local->airtime_v_t[ac] - AIRTIME_GRACE, > sta->airtime[ac].v_t); > @@ -3779,7 +3779,7 @@ static void __ieee80211_unschedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, > struct sta_info *sta = container_of(txq->sta, > struct sta_info, sta); > > - local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] -= sta->airtime_weight; > + local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] -= sta->airtime_weight[ac]; > } > > rb_erase_cached(&txqi->schedule_order, > -- > 1.9.1
On 2019-09-23 19:00, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> - if (params->airtime_weight) >> - sta->airtime_weight = params->airtime_weight; >> + if (params->airtime_weight && >> + params->airtime_weight != sta->airtime_weight) { > > This check doesn't work I think? You're not using the array-based > sta->airtime_weight[], and there are locking issues by just checking > like this; so maybe just keep the if() on params->airtime_weight, and > do > the checking inside the loop while holding the lock? It should be array-based sta->airtime_weight[] and I am missing that part during the porting. But you are right about we should check it inside the loop with the lock. > > Or could we just turn the weights into atomics to avoid the locking > entirely? Actually, we still need the active txq locking to make sure the txq is on the rbtree. Otherwise, no need to change airtime weight sum. > >> + for (ac = 0; ac < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; ac++) { >> + spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]); >> + for (tid = 0; tid < IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS + 1; tid++) { >> + if (!sta->sta.txq[tid] || >> + ac != ieee80211_ac_from_tid(tid)) >> + continue; >> + >> + pre_weight = sta->airtime_weight[ac]; >> + sta->airtime_weight[ac] = >> + params->airtime_weight; >> + >> + txqi = to_txq_info(sta->sta.txq[tid]); >> + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order)) >> + continue; >> + >> + local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] = local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] + >> + params->airtime_weight - >> + pre_weight; >> + } >> + spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]); >> + } >> + } >>
Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org> writes: > On 2019-09-23 19:00, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > >>> - if (params->airtime_weight) >>> - sta->airtime_weight = params->airtime_weight; >>> + if (params->airtime_weight && >>> + params->airtime_weight != sta->airtime_weight) { >> >> This check doesn't work I think? You're not using the array-based >> sta->airtime_weight[], and there are locking issues by just checking >> like this; so maybe just keep the if() on params->airtime_weight, and >> do >> the checking inside the loop while holding the lock? > > It should be array-based sta->airtime_weight[] and I am missing that > part during the porting. But you are right about we should check it > inside the loop with the lock. > >> >> Or could we just turn the weights into atomics to avoid the locking >> entirely? > > Actually, we still need the active txq locking to make sure the txq is > on the rbtree. Otherwise, no need to change airtime weight sum. True. Just moving the check inside the locking will be the right thing to do, then. -Toke
diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c index d65aa01..c8a0683 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c @@ -1284,7 +1284,8 @@ static int sta_apply_parameters(struct ieee80211_local *local, int ret = 0; struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband; struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = sta->sdata; - u32 mask, set; + u32 mask, set, tid, ac, pre_weight; + struct txq_info *txqi; sband = ieee80211_get_sband(sdata); if (!sband) @@ -1452,8 +1453,30 @@ static int sta_apply_parameters(struct ieee80211_local *local, if (ieee80211_vif_is_mesh(&sdata->vif)) sta_apply_mesh_params(local, sta, params); - if (params->airtime_weight) - sta->airtime_weight = params->airtime_weight; + if (params->airtime_weight && + params->airtime_weight != sta->airtime_weight) { + for (ac = 0; ac < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; ac++) { + spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]); + for (tid = 0; tid < IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS + 1; tid++) { + if (!sta->sta.txq[tid] || + ac != ieee80211_ac_from_tid(tid)) + continue; + + pre_weight = sta->airtime_weight[ac]; + sta->airtime_weight[ac] = + params->airtime_weight; + + txqi = to_txq_info(sta->sta.txq[tid]); + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order)) + continue; + + local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] = local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] + + params->airtime_weight - + pre_weight; + } + spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]); + } + } /* set the STA state after all sta info from usermode has been set */ if (test_sta_flag(sta, WLAN_STA_TDLS_PEER) || diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c index 80028da..43a7e6a 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c +++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static ssize_t sta_airtime_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf, "Virt-T: VO: %lld us VI: %lld us BE: %lld us BK: %lld us\n", rx_airtime, tx_airtime, - sta->airtime_weight, + sta->airtime_weight[0], v_t[0], v_t[1], v_t[2], diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c index feac975..e599cf1 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c +++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c @@ -384,11 +384,10 @@ struct sta_info *sta_info_alloc(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, if (sta_prepare_rate_control(local, sta, gfp)) goto free_txq; - sta->airtime_weight = IEEE80211_DEFAULT_AIRTIME_WEIGHT; - for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; i++) { skb_queue_head_init(&sta->ps_tx_buf[i]); skb_queue_head_init(&sta->tx_filtered[i]); + sta->airtime_weight[i] = IEEE80211_DEFAULT_AIRTIME_WEIGHT; } for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS; i++) @@ -1850,11 +1849,11 @@ void ieee80211_sta_register_airtime(struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta, u8 tid, sta->airtime[ac].tx_airtime += tx_airtime; sta->airtime[ac].rx_airtime += rx_airtime; - weight_sum = local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] ?: sta->airtime_weight; + weight_sum = local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] ?: sta->airtime_weight[ac]; /* Round the calculation of global vt */ local->airtime_v_t[ac] += (airtime + (weight_sum >> 1)) / weight_sum; - sta->airtime[ac].v_t += airtime / sta->airtime_weight; + sta->airtime[ac].v_t += airtime / sta->airtime_weight[ac]; ieee80211_resort_txq(&local->hw, txq); spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]); @@ -2236,7 +2235,7 @@ void sta_set_sinfo(struct sta_info *sta, struct station_info *sinfo, } if (!(sinfo->filled & BIT_ULL(NL80211_STA_INFO_AIRTIME_WEIGHT))) { - sinfo->airtime_weight = sta->airtime_weight; + sinfo->airtime_weight = sta->airtime_weight[0]; sinfo->filled |= BIT_ULL(NL80211_STA_INFO_AIRTIME_WEIGHT); } diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.h b/net/mac80211/sta_info.h index 5055f94..2697343 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.h +++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.h @@ -476,7 +476,8 @@ struct ieee80211_sta_rx_stats { * @tid_seq: per-TID sequence numbers for sending to this STA * @airtime: per-AC struct airtime_info describing airtime statistics for this * station - * @airtime_weight: station weight for airtime fairness calculation purposes + * @airtime_weight: station per-AC weight for airtime fairness calculation + * purposes * @ampdu_mlme: A-MPDU state machine state * @mesh: mesh STA information * @debugfs_dir: debug filesystem directory dentry @@ -602,7 +603,7 @@ struct sta_info { u16 tid_seq[IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_TID_MASK + 1]; struct airtime_info airtime[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS]; - u16 airtime_weight; + u16 airtime_weight[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS]; /* * Aggregation information, locked with lock. diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c index 60cf569..286cf14 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/tx.c +++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c @@ -3735,7 +3735,7 @@ void ieee80211_schedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sta_info *sta = container_of(txq->sta, struct sta_info, sta); - local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] += sta->airtime_weight; + local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] += sta->airtime_weight[ac]; if (local->airtime_v_t[ac] > AIRTIME_GRACE) sta->airtime[ac].v_t = max(local->airtime_v_t[ac] - AIRTIME_GRACE, sta->airtime[ac].v_t); @@ -3779,7 +3779,7 @@ static void __ieee80211_unschedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sta_info *sta = container_of(txq->sta, struct sta_info, sta); - local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] -= sta->airtime_weight; + local->airtime_weight_sum[ac] -= sta->airtime_weight[ac]; } rb_erase_cached(&txqi->schedule_order,
Global airtime weight sum is updated only when txq is added/removed from rbtree. If upper layer configures sta weight during high load, airtime weight sum will not be updated since txq is most likely on the tree. It could a little late for upper layer to reconfigure sta weight when txq is already in the rbtree. And thus, incorrect airtime weight sum will lead to incorrect global virtual time calculation as well as overflow of airtime weight sum during txq removed. Hence, need to update airtime weight sum upon receiving event for configuring sta weight once sta's txq is on the rbtree. Besides, if airtime weight sum of ACs and sta weight is synced under the same per AC lock protection, there can be a very short window causing incorrct airtime weight sum calculation as below: active_txq_lock_VO . VO weight sum is syncd . sta airtime weight sum is synced . active_txq_unlock_VO . . . active_txq_lock_VI . VI weight sum is syncd . sta airtime weight sum active_txq_lock_BE active_txq_unlock_VI Remove txq and thus sum . is calculated with synced . sta airtime weight . active_txq_unlock_BE So introduce a per ac synced station airtime weight synced with per AC synced weight sum together. And the per-AC station airtime weight is used to calculate weight sum. Signed-off-by: Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org> --- net/mac80211/cfg.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c | 2 +- net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 9 ++++----- net/mac80211/sta_info.h | 5 +++-- net/mac80211/tx.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)