| Message ID | 20160914163231.20863-1-benjamin@sipsolutions.net (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
| Headers | show |
Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net> writes: > ath10k_hw_qca988x_set_coverage_class needs to hold both conf_mutex and > the data_lock spin lock for parts of the function. However, data_lock > is only needed while storing the coverage_class to store the value that > the card is configured to. > > Fix the locking issue by only holding data_lock for the required duration. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net> Thanks, I also folded this with the patch in the pending branch. > And yes, I fully agree with your points of it being rather fragile. But as > you said, it should be entirely safe if not used. That's good. > Obviously a firmware implementation would be preferential. That's a shame as this feature is quite often requested. But if the firmware ever starts supporting the featrue we can then remove this hack from ath10k. > This locking issue was pretty unnecessary. Lets see if any more issues show > up in a closer review. I can't see the locking problem anymore so it seems to be fixed. I'll fix some minor things and send v2. I'll also CC linux-wireless.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h index 89b07be..5f8c31f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h @@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ struct ath10k { struct work_struct set_coverage_class_work; /* protected by conf_mutex */ struct { - /* protected by data_lock */ + /* writing also protected by data_lock */ s16 coverage_class; u32 reg_phyclk; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.c index e182f09..bd5ca6a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.c @@ -243,7 +243,6 @@ static void ath10k_hw_qca988x_set_coverage_class(struct ath10k *ar, u32 fw_dbglog_level; mutex_lock(&ar->conf_mutex); - spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock); /* Only modify registers if the core is started. */ if ((ar->state != ATH10K_STATE_ON) && @@ -356,12 +355,14 @@ static void ath10k_hw_qca988x_set_coverage_class(struct ath10k *ar, store_regs: /* After an error we will not retry setting the coverage class. */ + spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock); ar->fw_coverage.coverage_class = value; + spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock); + ar->fw_coverage.reg_slottime_conf = slottime_reg; ar->fw_coverage.reg_ack_cts_timeout_conf = timeout_reg; unlock: - spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock); mutex_unlock(&ar->conf_mutex); }
ath10k_hw_qca988x_set_coverage_class needs to hold both conf_mutex and the data_lock spin lock for parts of the function. However, data_lock is only needed while storing the coverage_class to store the value that the card is configured to. Fix the locking issue by only holding data_lock for the required duration. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net> --- And yes, I fully agree with your points of it being rather fragile. But as you said, it should be entirely safe if not used. Obviously a firmware implementation would be preferential. This locking issue was pretty unnecessary. Lets see if any more issues show up in a closer review. drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h | 2 +- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)