Message ID | 20180923174535.16198-1-hauke@hauke-m.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | backports: misc fixes to improve support of 4.19 | expand |
I applied pretty much everything, but the result isn't looking so
great...
But that's sort of looking only perhaps? 3.10-4.2 fail on skcipher
backport, which was pretty much always doomed given the crypto API
complexity ...
johannes
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
On 09/24/2018 10:12 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > I applied pretty much everything, but the result isn't looking so > great... Thanks for applying the patches. > But that's sort of looking only perhaps? 3.10-4.2 fail on skcipher > backport, which was pretty much always doomed given the crypto API > complexity ... If it is only needed for the drivers using lib80211, I think we can make them depend on kernel >= 4.2. Did you test compile it on drvbp1.linux-foundation.org, or do I have to update the installed kernel versions there? Hauke
On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 22:27 +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > But that's sort of looking only perhaps? 3.10-4.2 fail on skcipher > > backport, which was pretty much always doomed given the crypto API > > complexity ... > > If it is only needed for the drivers using lib80211, I think we can make > them depend on kernel >= 4.2. Indeed. I need to do a new run with that fixed (see my lib80211 skcipher removal patch), but was waiting for Luca's updated iwlwifi patch since I fail on that every time too. > Did you test compile it on drvbp1.linux-foundation.org, or do I have to > update the installed kernel versions there? I did, but it's probably restricted to my account. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in