diff mbox series

[v2,1/2] Bluetooth: Fix using address type from events

Message ID 20210830205537.118960-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: Luiz Von Dentz
Headers show
Series [v2,1/2] Bluetooth: Fix using address type from events | expand

Commit Message

Luiz Augusto von Dentz Aug. 30, 2021, 8:55 p.m. UTC
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>

Address types ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC_RESOLVED and
ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM_RESOLVED shall be converted to ADDR_LE_PUBLIC and
ADDR_LE_RANDOM repectively since they are not safe to be used beyond
the scope of the events themselves.

Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c  |  9 -------
 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

Comments

Marcel Holtmann Aug. 30, 2021, 9:17 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Luiz,

> Address types ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC_RESOLVED and
> ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM_RESOLVED shall be converted to ADDR_LE_PUBLIC and
> ADDR_LE_RANDOM repectively since they are not safe to be used beyond
> the scope of the events themselves.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c  |  9 -------
> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel
bluez.test.bot@gmail.com Aug. 31, 2021, 7:10 p.m. UTC | #2
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=539427

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    FAIL      0.73 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.25 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      635.20 seconds
TestRunner: Setup             PASS      409.06 seconds
TestRunner: l2cap-tester      PASS      3.00 seconds
TestRunner: bnep-tester       PASS      2.14 seconds
TestRunner: mgmt-tester       PASS      32.36 seconds
TestRunner: rfcomm-tester     PASS      2.24 seconds
TestRunner: sco-tester        PASS      2.30 seconds
TestRunner: smp-tester        PASS      2.39 seconds
TestRunner: userchan-tester   PASS      2.17 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - FAIL - 0.73 seconds
Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf
Bluetooth: Fix using address type from events
WARNING: 'repectively' may be misspelled - perhaps 'respectively'?
#8: 
ADDR_LE_RANDOM repectively since they are not safe to be used beyond
               ^^^^^^^^^^^

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 98 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

"[PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix using address type from events" has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.


##############################
Test: GitLint - PASS - 0.25 seconds
Run gitlint with rule in .gitlint


##############################
Test: BuildKernel - PASS - 635.20 seconds
Build Kernel with minimal configuration supports Bluetooth


##############################
Test: TestRunner: Setup - PASS - 409.06 seconds
Setup environment for running Test Runner


##############################
Test: TestRunner: l2cap-tester - PASS - 3.00 seconds
Run test-runner with l2cap-tester
Total: 40, Passed: 40 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: bnep-tester - PASS - 2.14 seconds
Run test-runner with bnep-tester
Total: 1, Passed: 1 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: mgmt-tester - PASS - 32.36 seconds
Run test-runner with mgmt-tester
Total: 452, Passed: 452 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - PASS - 2.24 seconds
Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester
Total: 9, Passed: 9 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: sco-tester - PASS - 2.30 seconds
Run test-runner with sco-tester
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: smp-tester - PASS - 2.39 seconds
Run test-runner with smp-tester
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS - 2.17 seconds
Run test-runner with userchan-tester
Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0



---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
index 8a47a3017d61..f3a18d16b81f 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
@@ -3487,15 +3487,6 @@  struct hci_conn_params *hci_pend_le_action_lookup(struct list_head *list,
 {
 	struct hci_conn_params *param;
 
-	switch (addr_type) {
-	case ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC_RESOLVED:
-		addr_type = ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC;
-		break;
-	case ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM_RESOLVED:
-		addr_type = ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM;
-		break;
-	}
-
 	list_for_each_entry(param, list, action) {
 		if (bacmp(&param->addr, addr) == 0 &&
 		    param->addr_type == addr_type)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index 293d4c9c4b09..1934a4b6c047 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -2367,6 +2367,22 @@  static void hci_cs_disconnect(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 status)
 	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
 }
 
+static u8 ev_bdaddr_type(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 type)
+{
+	/* When using controller based address resolution, then the new
+	 * address types 0x02 and 0x03 are used. These types need to be
+	 * converted back into either public address or random address type
+	 */
+	switch (type) {
+	case ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC_RESOLVED:
+		return ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC;
+	case ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM_RESOLVED:
+		return ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM;
+	}
+
+	return type;
+}
+
 static void cs_le_create_conn(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *peer_addr,
 			      u8 peer_addr_type, u8 own_address_type,
 			      u8 filter_policy)
@@ -2378,21 +2394,7 @@  static void cs_le_create_conn(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *peer_addr,
 	if (!conn)
 		return;
 
-	/* When using controller based address resolution, then the new
-	 * address types 0x02 and 0x03 are used. These types need to be
-	 * converted back into either public address or random address type
-	 */
-	if (use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
-	    hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_LL_RPA_RESOLUTION)) {
-		switch (own_address_type) {
-		case ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC_RESOLVED:
-			own_address_type = ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC;
-			break;
-		case ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM_RESOLVED:
-			own_address_type = ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
+	own_address_type = ev_bdaddr_type(hdev, own_address_type);
 
 	/* Store the initiator and responder address information which
 	 * is needed for SMP. These values will not change during the
@@ -5282,22 +5284,7 @@  static void le_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 status,
 		conn->dst_type = irk->addr_type;
 	}
 
-	/* When using controller based address resolution, then the new
-	 * address types 0x02 and 0x03 are used. These types need to be
-	 * converted back into either public address or random address type
-	 */
-	if (use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
-	    hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY) &&
-	    hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_LL_RPA_RESOLUTION)) {
-		switch (conn->dst_type) {
-		case ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC_RESOLVED:
-			conn->dst_type = ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC;
-			break;
-		case ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM_RESOLVED:
-			conn->dst_type = ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
+	conn->dst_type = ev_bdaddr_type(hdev, conn->dst_type);
 
 	if (status) {
 		hci_le_conn_failed(conn, status);
@@ -5619,6 +5606,8 @@  static void process_adv_report(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 type, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
 	 * controller address.
 	 */
 	if (direct_addr) {
+		direct_addr_type = ev_bdaddr_type(hdev, direct_addr_type);
+
 		/* Only resolvable random addresses are valid for these
 		 * kind of reports and others can be ignored.
 		 */
@@ -5646,6 +5635,8 @@  static void process_adv_report(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 type, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
 		bdaddr_type = irk->addr_type;
 	}
 
+	bdaddr_type = ev_bdaddr_type(hdev, bdaddr_type);
+
 	/* Check if we have been requested to connect to this device.
 	 *
 	 * direct_addr is set only for directed advertising reports (it is NULL