Message ID | 1527702222-8232-7-git-send-email-idryomov@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c index 294320400c72..3d055529189c 100644 --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c @@ -2447,8 +2447,9 @@ static int abort_on_full_fn(struct ceph_osd_request *req, void *arg) bool *victims = arg; if (req->r_abort_on_full && + (req->r_flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE) && (ceph_osdmap_flag(osdc, CEPH_OSDMAP_FULL) || - pool_full(osdc, req->r_t.target_oloc.pool))) { + pool_full(osdc, req->r_t.base_oloc.pool))) { if (!*victims) { update_epoch_barrier(osdc, osdc->osdmap->epoch); *victims = true;
Don't consider reads for aborting and use ->base_oloc instead of ->target_oloc, as done in __submit_request(). Strictly speaking, we shouldn't be aborting FULL_TRY/FULL_FORCE writes either. But, there is an inconsistency in FULL_TRY/FULL_FORCE handling on the OSD side [1], so given that neither of these is used in the kernel client, leave it for when the OSD behaviour is sorted out. [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/24339 Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> --- net/ceph/osd_client.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)