diff mbox series

ceph: make sure the mdsc->mutex is nested in s->s_mutex to fix dead lock

Message ID 1589961079-27932-1-git-send-email-xiubli@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series ceph: make sure the mdsc->mutex is nested in s->s_mutex to fix dead lock | expand

Commit Message

Xiubo Li May 20, 2020, 7:51 a.m. UTC
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>

The call trace:

<6>[15981.740583] libceph: mon2 (1)10.72.36.245:40083 session lost, hunting for new mon
<3>[16097.960293] INFO: task kworker/18:1:32111 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
<3>[16097.960860]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
<3>[16097.961332] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
<6>[16097.961868] kworker/18:1    D    0 32111      2 0x80004080
<6>[16097.962151] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
<4>[16097.962188] Call Trace:
<4>[16097.962353]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
<4>[16097.962359]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
<4>[16097.962364]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
<4>[16097.962368]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
<4>[16097.962460]  ? kick_requests+0x21/0x100 [ceph]
<4>[16097.962485]  ? ceph_mdsc_handle_mdsmap+0x19c/0x5f0 [ceph]
<4>[16097.962503]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
<4>[16097.962523]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
<4>[16097.962580]  ? dispatch+0x77/0x930 [libceph]
<4>[16097.962602]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
<4>[16097.962619]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
<4>[16097.962623]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
<4>[16097.962627]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
<4>[16097.962631]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
<4>[16097.962635]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
<4>[16097.962654]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
<4>[16097.962713]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
<4>[16097.962717]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
<4>[16097.962722]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
<4>[16097.962737]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
<4>[16097.962742]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
<4>[16097.962747]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
<3>[16097.962758] INFO: task kworker/25:1:1747 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
<3>[16097.963233]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
<3>[16097.963792] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
<6>[16097.964298] kworker/25:1    D    0  1747      2 0x80004080
<6>[16097.964325] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
<4>[16097.964331] Call Trace:
<4>[16097.964340]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
<4>[16097.964344]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
<4>[16097.964347]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
<4>[16097.964351]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
<4>[16097.964376]  ? handle_reply+0x33f/0x6f0 [ceph]
<4>[16097.964407]  ? dispatch+0xa6/0xbc0 [ceph]
<4>[16097.964429]  ? read_partial_message+0x214/0x770 [libceph]
<4>[16097.964449]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
<4>[16097.964454]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
<4>[16097.964458]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
<4>[16097.964461]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
<4>[16097.964465]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
<4>[16097.964470]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
<4>[16097.964489]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
<4>[16097.964494]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
<4>[16097.964498]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
<4>[16097.964501]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
<4>[16097.964506]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
<4>[16097.964511]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
<4>[16097.964516]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/45609
Reported-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
---
 fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Jeff Layton May 20, 2020, 11:44 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2020-05-20 at 03:51 -0400, xiubli@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
> 
> The call trace:
> 
> <6>[15981.740583] libceph: mon2 (1)10.72.36.245:40083 session lost, hunting for new mon
> <3>[16097.960293] INFO: task kworker/18:1:32111 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
> <3>[16097.960860]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
> <3>[16097.961332] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> <6>[16097.961868] kworker/18:1    D    0 32111      2 0x80004080
> <6>[16097.962151] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
> <4>[16097.962188] Call Trace:
> <4>[16097.962353]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
> <4>[16097.962359]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
> <4>[16097.962364]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
> <4>[16097.962368]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
> <4>[16097.962460]  ? kick_requests+0x21/0x100 [ceph]
> <4>[16097.962485]  ? ceph_mdsc_handle_mdsmap+0x19c/0x5f0 [ceph]
> <4>[16097.962503]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
> <4>[16097.962523]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
> <4>[16097.962580]  ? dispatch+0x77/0x930 [libceph]
> <4>[16097.962602]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
> <4>[16097.962619]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> <4>[16097.962623]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> <4>[16097.962627]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> <4>[16097.962631]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> <4>[16097.962635]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> <4>[16097.962654]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
> <4>[16097.962713]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
> <4>[16097.962717]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
> <4>[16097.962722]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
> <4>[16097.962737]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
> <4>[16097.962742]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
> <4>[16097.962747]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> <3>[16097.962758] INFO: task kworker/25:1:1747 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
> <3>[16097.963233]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
> <3>[16097.963792] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> <6>[16097.964298] kworker/25:1    D    0  1747      2 0x80004080
> <6>[16097.964325] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
> <4>[16097.964331] Call Trace:
> <4>[16097.964340]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
> <4>[16097.964344]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
> <4>[16097.964347]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
> <4>[16097.964351]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
> <4>[16097.964376]  ? handle_reply+0x33f/0x6f0 [ceph]
> <4>[16097.964407]  ? dispatch+0xa6/0xbc0 [ceph]
> <4>[16097.964429]  ? read_partial_message+0x214/0x770 [libceph]
> <4>[16097.964449]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
> <4>[16097.964454]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> <4>[16097.964458]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> <4>[16097.964461]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> <4>[16097.964465]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> <4>[16097.964470]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> <4>[16097.964489]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
> <4>[16097.964494]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
> <4>[16097.964498]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
> <4>[16097.964501]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
> <4>[16097.964506]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
> <4>[16097.964511]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
> <4>[16097.964516]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> 
> URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/45609
> Reported-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> index 6c283c5..0e0ab01 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> @@ -3769,8 +3769,6 @@ static int encode_snap_realms(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
>   * recovering MDS might have.
>   *
>   * This is a relatively heavyweight operation, but it's rare.
> - *
> - * called with mdsc->mutex held.
>   */
>  static void send_mds_reconnect(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
>  			       struct ceph_mds_session *session)
> @@ -4024,7 +4022,9 @@ static void check_new_map(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
>  			    oldstate != CEPH_MDS_STATE_STARTING)
>  				pr_info("mds%d recovery completed\n", s->s_mds);
>  			kick_requests(mdsc, i);
> +			mutex_unlock(&mdsc->mutex);
>  			mutex_lock(&s->s_mutex);
> +			mutex_lock(&mdsc->mutex);
>  			ceph_kick_flushing_caps(mdsc, s);
>  			mutex_unlock(&s->s_mutex);
>  			wake_up_session_caps(s, RECONNECT);


Good catch. Merged into testing branch.

Thanks!
Ilya Dryomov May 27, 2020, 12:25 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-05-20 at 03:51 -0400, xiubli@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
> >
> > The call trace:
> >
> > <6>[15981.740583] libceph: mon2 (1)10.72.36.245:40083 session lost, hunting for new mon
> > <3>[16097.960293] INFO: task kworker/18:1:32111 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
> > <3>[16097.960860]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
> > <3>[16097.961332] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > <6>[16097.961868] kworker/18:1    D    0 32111      2 0x80004080
> > <6>[16097.962151] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
> > <4>[16097.962188] Call Trace:
> > <4>[16097.962353]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
> > <4>[16097.962359]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
> > <4>[16097.962364]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
> > <4>[16097.962368]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
> > <4>[16097.962460]  ? kick_requests+0x21/0x100 [ceph]
> > <4>[16097.962485]  ? ceph_mdsc_handle_mdsmap+0x19c/0x5f0 [ceph]
> > <4>[16097.962503]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
> > <4>[16097.962523]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
> > <4>[16097.962580]  ? dispatch+0x77/0x930 [libceph]
> > <4>[16097.962602]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
> > <4>[16097.962619]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > <4>[16097.962623]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> > <4>[16097.962627]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > <4>[16097.962631]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> > <4>[16097.962635]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > <4>[16097.962654]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
> > <4>[16097.962713]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
> > <4>[16097.962717]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
> > <4>[16097.962722]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
> > <4>[16097.962737]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
> > <4>[16097.962742]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
> > <4>[16097.962747]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> > <3>[16097.962758] INFO: task kworker/25:1:1747 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
> > <3>[16097.963233]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
> > <3>[16097.963792] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > <6>[16097.964298] kworker/25:1    D    0  1747      2 0x80004080
> > <6>[16097.964325] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
> > <4>[16097.964331] Call Trace:
> > <4>[16097.964340]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
> > <4>[16097.964344]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
> > <4>[16097.964347]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
> > <4>[16097.964351]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
> > <4>[16097.964376]  ? handle_reply+0x33f/0x6f0 [ceph]
> > <4>[16097.964407]  ? dispatch+0xa6/0xbc0 [ceph]
> > <4>[16097.964429]  ? read_partial_message+0x214/0x770 [libceph]
> > <4>[16097.964449]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
> > <4>[16097.964454]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > <4>[16097.964458]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> > <4>[16097.964461]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > <4>[16097.964465]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> > <4>[16097.964470]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > <4>[16097.964489]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
> > <4>[16097.964494]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
> > <4>[16097.964498]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
> > <4>[16097.964501]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
> > <4>[16097.964506]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
> > <4>[16097.964511]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
> > <4>[16097.964516]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> >
> > URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/45609
> > Reported-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> > index 6c283c5..0e0ab01 100644
> > --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> > +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> > @@ -3769,8 +3769,6 @@ static int encode_snap_realms(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
> >   * recovering MDS might have.
> >   *
> >   * This is a relatively heavyweight operation, but it's rare.
> > - *
> > - * called with mdsc->mutex held.
> >   */
> >  static void send_mds_reconnect(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
> >                              struct ceph_mds_session *session)
> > @@ -4024,7 +4022,9 @@ static void check_new_map(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
> >                           oldstate != CEPH_MDS_STATE_STARTING)
> >                               pr_info("mds%d recovery completed\n", s->s_mds);
> >                       kick_requests(mdsc, i);
> > +                     mutex_unlock(&mdsc->mutex);
> >                       mutex_lock(&s->s_mutex);
> > +                     mutex_lock(&mdsc->mutex);
> >                       ceph_kick_flushing_caps(mdsc, s);
> >                       mutex_unlock(&s->s_mutex);
> >                       wake_up_session_caps(s, RECONNECT);
>
>
> Good catch. Merged into testing branch.

These stack traces take up the entire screen and provide very
little information.  Since this is a simple lock ordering issue,
could they be replaced with a short description and perhaps a
reference to mds_client.h where lock dependencies are documented?

Thanks,

                Ilya
Xiubo Li May 27, 2020, 12:47 p.m. UTC | #3
On 2020/5/27 20:25, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2020-05-20 at 03:51 -0400, xiubli@redhat.com wrote:
>>> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> The call trace:
>>>
>>> <6>[15981.740583] libceph: mon2 (1)10.72.36.245:40083 session lost, hunting for new mon
>>> <3>[16097.960293] INFO: task kworker/18:1:32111 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
>>> <3>[16097.960860]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
>>> <3>[16097.961332] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>>> <6>[16097.961868] kworker/18:1    D    0 32111      2 0x80004080
>>> <6>[16097.962151] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
>>> <4>[16097.962188] Call Trace:
>>> <4>[16097.962353]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
>>> <4>[16097.962359]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
>>> <4>[16097.962364]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
>>> <4>[16097.962368]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
>>> <4>[16097.962460]  ? kick_requests+0x21/0x100 [ceph]
>>> <4>[16097.962485]  ? ceph_mdsc_handle_mdsmap+0x19c/0x5f0 [ceph]
>>> <4>[16097.962503]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
>>> <4>[16097.962523]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
>>> <4>[16097.962580]  ? dispatch+0x77/0x930 [libceph]
>>> <4>[16097.962602]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
>>> <4>[16097.962619]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>> <4>[16097.962623]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
>>> <4>[16097.962627]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>> <4>[16097.962631]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
>>> <4>[16097.962635]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>> <4>[16097.962654]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
>>> <4>[16097.962713]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
>>> <4>[16097.962717]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
>>> <4>[16097.962722]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
>>> <4>[16097.962737]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
>>> <4>[16097.962742]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
>>> <4>[16097.962747]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>>> <3>[16097.962758] INFO: task kworker/25:1:1747 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
>>> <3>[16097.963233]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
>>> <3>[16097.963792] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>>> <6>[16097.964298] kworker/25:1    D    0  1747      2 0x80004080
>>> <6>[16097.964325] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
>>> <4>[16097.964331] Call Trace:
>>> <4>[16097.964340]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
>>> <4>[16097.964344]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
>>> <4>[16097.964347]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
>>> <4>[16097.964351]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
>>> <4>[16097.964376]  ? handle_reply+0x33f/0x6f0 [ceph]
>>> <4>[16097.964407]  ? dispatch+0xa6/0xbc0 [ceph]
>>> <4>[16097.964429]  ? read_partial_message+0x214/0x770 [libceph]
>>> <4>[16097.964449]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
>>> <4>[16097.964454]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>> <4>[16097.964458]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
>>> <4>[16097.964461]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>> <4>[16097.964465]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
>>> <4>[16097.964470]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>> <4>[16097.964489]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
>>> <4>[16097.964494]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
>>> <4>[16097.964498]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
>>> <4>[16097.964501]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
>>> <4>[16097.964506]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
>>> <4>[16097.964511]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
>>> <4>[16097.964516]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>>>
>>> URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/45609
>>> Reported-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 4 ++--
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>>> index 6c283c5..0e0ab01 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>>> @@ -3769,8 +3769,6 @@ static int encode_snap_realms(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
>>>    * recovering MDS might have.
>>>    *
>>>    * This is a relatively heavyweight operation, but it's rare.
>>> - *
>>> - * called with mdsc->mutex held.
>>>    */
>>>   static void send_mds_reconnect(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
>>>                               struct ceph_mds_session *session)
>>> @@ -4024,7 +4022,9 @@ static void check_new_map(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
>>>                            oldstate != CEPH_MDS_STATE_STARTING)
>>>                                pr_info("mds%d recovery completed\n", s->s_mds);
>>>                        kick_requests(mdsc, i);
>>> +                     mutex_unlock(&mdsc->mutex);
>>>                        mutex_lock(&s->s_mutex);
>>> +                     mutex_lock(&mdsc->mutex);
>>>                        ceph_kick_flushing_caps(mdsc, s);
>>>                        mutex_unlock(&s->s_mutex);
>>>                        wake_up_session_caps(s, RECONNECT);
>>
>> Good catch. Merged into testing branch.
> These stack traces take up the entire screen and provide very
> little information.  Since this is a simple lock ordering issue,
> could they be replaced with a short description and perhaps a
> reference to mds_client.h where lock dependencies are documented?

Hmm, it makes sense.

Should I post a V2 ? Or will Jeff do the fix on the testing branch ?

Thanks
BRs
Xiubo


> Thanks,
>
>                  Ilya
>
Jeff Layton May 27, 2020, 1:47 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 20:47 +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> On 2020/5/27 20:25, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-05-20 at 03:51 -0400, xiubli@redhat.com wrote:
> > > > From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
> > > > 
> > > > The call trace:
> > > > 
> > > > <6>[15981.740583] libceph: mon2 (1)10.72.36.245:40083 session lost, hunting for new mon
> > > > <3>[16097.960293] INFO: task kworker/18:1:32111 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
> > > > <3>[16097.960860]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
> > > > <3>[16097.961332] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > > > <6>[16097.961868] kworker/18:1    D    0 32111      2 0x80004080
> > > > <6>[16097.962151] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.962188] Call Trace:
> > > > <4>[16097.962353]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
> > > > <4>[16097.962359]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
> > > > <4>[16097.962364]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
> > > > <4>[16097.962368]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
> > > > <4>[16097.962460]  ? kick_requests+0x21/0x100 [ceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.962485]  ? ceph_mdsc_handle_mdsmap+0x19c/0x5f0 [ceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.962503]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.962523]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.962580]  ? dispatch+0x77/0x930 [libceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.962602]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.962619]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > > > <4>[16097.962623]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> > > > <4>[16097.962627]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > > > <4>[16097.962631]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> > > > <4>[16097.962635]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > > > <4>[16097.962654]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.962713]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
> > > > <4>[16097.962717]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
> > > > <4>[16097.962722]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
> > > > <4>[16097.962737]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
> > > > <4>[16097.962742]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
> > > > <4>[16097.962747]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> > > > <3>[16097.962758] INFO: task kworker/25:1:1747 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
> > > > <3>[16097.963233]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
> > > > <3>[16097.963792] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > > > <6>[16097.964298] kworker/25:1    D    0  1747      2 0x80004080
> > > > <6>[16097.964325] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.964331] Call Trace:
> > > > <4>[16097.964340]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
> > > > <4>[16097.964344]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
> > > > <4>[16097.964347]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
> > > > <4>[16097.964351]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
> > > > <4>[16097.964376]  ? handle_reply+0x33f/0x6f0 [ceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.964407]  ? dispatch+0xa6/0xbc0 [ceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.964429]  ? read_partial_message+0x214/0x770 [libceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.964449]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.964454]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > > > <4>[16097.964458]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> > > > <4>[16097.964461]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > > > <4>[16097.964465]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> > > > <4>[16097.964470]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > > > <4>[16097.964489]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
> > > > <4>[16097.964494]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
> > > > <4>[16097.964498]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
> > > > <4>[16097.964501]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
> > > > <4>[16097.964506]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
> > > > <4>[16097.964511]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
> > > > <4>[16097.964516]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> > > > 
> > > > URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/45609
> > > > Reported-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 4 ++--
> > > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> > > > index 6c283c5..0e0ab01 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> > > > @@ -3769,8 +3769,6 @@ static int encode_snap_realms(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
> > > >    * recovering MDS might have.
> > > >    *
> > > >    * This is a relatively heavyweight operation, but it's rare.
> > > > - *
> > > > - * called with mdsc->mutex held.
> > > >    */
> > > >   static void send_mds_reconnect(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
> > > >                               struct ceph_mds_session *session)
> > > > @@ -4024,7 +4022,9 @@ static void check_new_map(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
> > > >                            oldstate != CEPH_MDS_STATE_STARTING)
> > > >                                pr_info("mds%d recovery completed\n", s->s_mds);
> > > >                        kick_requests(mdsc, i);
> > > > +                     mutex_unlock(&mdsc->mutex);
> > > >                        mutex_lock(&s->s_mutex);
> > > > +                     mutex_lock(&mdsc->mutex);
> > > >                        ceph_kick_flushing_caps(mdsc, s);
> > > >                        mutex_unlock(&s->s_mutex);
> > > >                        wake_up_session_caps(s, RECONNECT);
> > > 
> > > Good catch. Merged into testing branch.
> > These stack traces take up the entire screen and provide very
> > little information.  Since this is a simple lock ordering issue,
> > could they be replaced with a short description and perhaps a
> > reference to mds_client.h where lock dependencies are documented?
> 
> Hmm, it makes sense.
> 
> Should I post a V2 ? Or will Jeff do the fix on the testing branch ?
> 

I went ahead and just fixed it in the testing branch. Let me know if you want to revise the verbiage.
Xiubo Li May 27, 2020, 1:53 p.m. UTC | #5
On 2020/5/27 21:47, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 20:47 +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
>> On 2020/5/27 20:25, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2020-05-20 at 03:51 -0400, xiubli@redhat.com wrote:
>>>>> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> The call trace:
>>>>>
>>>>> <6>[15981.740583] libceph: mon2 (1)10.72.36.245:40083 session lost, hunting for new mon
>>>>> <3>[16097.960293] INFO: task kworker/18:1:32111 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
>>>>> <3>[16097.960860]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
>>>>> <3>[16097.961332] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>>>>> <6>[16097.961868] kworker/18:1    D    0 32111      2 0x80004080
>>>>> <6>[16097.962151] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.962188] Call Trace:
>>>>> <4>[16097.962353]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
>>>>> <4>[16097.962359]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
>>>>> <4>[16097.962364]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
>>>>> <4>[16097.962368]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
>>>>> <4>[16097.962460]  ? kick_requests+0x21/0x100 [ceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.962485]  ? ceph_mdsc_handle_mdsmap+0x19c/0x5f0 [ceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.962503]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.962523]  ? extra_mon_dispatch+0x34/0x40 [ceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.962580]  ? dispatch+0x77/0x930 [libceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.962602]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.962619]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>>>> <4>[16097.962623]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
>>>>> <4>[16097.962627]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>>>> <4>[16097.962631]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
>>>>> <4>[16097.962635]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>>>> <4>[16097.962654]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.962713]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
>>>>> <4>[16097.962717]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
>>>>> <4>[16097.962722]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
>>>>> <4>[16097.962737]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
>>>>> <4>[16097.962742]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
>>>>> <4>[16097.962747]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>>>>> <3>[16097.962758] INFO: task kworker/25:1:1747 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
>>>>> <3>[16097.963233]       Tainted: G            E     5.7.0-rc5+ #80
>>>>> <3>[16097.963792] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>>>>> <6>[16097.964298] kworker/25:1    D    0  1747      2 0x80004080
>>>>> <6>[16097.964325] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [libceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.964331] Call Trace:
>>>>> <4>[16097.964340]  ? __schedule+0x276/0x6e0
>>>>> <4>[16097.964344]  ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
>>>>> <4>[16097.964347]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
>>>>> <4>[16097.964351]  ? __mutex_lock.isra.8+0x2b5/0x4a0
>>>>> <4>[16097.964376]  ? handle_reply+0x33f/0x6f0 [ceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.964407]  ? dispatch+0xa6/0xbc0 [ceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.964429]  ? read_partial_message+0x214/0x770 [libceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.964449]  ? try_read+0x78b/0x11e0 [libceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.964454]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>>>> <4>[16097.964458]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
>>>>> <4>[16097.964461]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>>>> <4>[16097.964465]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
>>>>> <4>[16097.964470]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
>>>>> <4>[16097.964489]  ? ceph_con_workfn+0x130/0x5e0 [libceph]
>>>>> <4>[16097.964494]  ? process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
>>>>> <4>[16097.964498]  ? worker_thread+0x30/0x390
>>>>> <4>[16097.964501]  ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
>>>>> <4>[16097.964506]  ? kthread+0x112/0x130
>>>>> <4>[16097.964511]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
>>>>> <4>[16097.964516]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/45609
>>>>> Reported-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>>>>> index 6c283c5..0e0ab01 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>>>>> @@ -3769,8 +3769,6 @@ static int encode_snap_realms(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
>>>>>     * recovering MDS might have.
>>>>>     *
>>>>>     * This is a relatively heavyweight operation, but it's rare.
>>>>> - *
>>>>> - * called with mdsc->mutex held.
>>>>>     */
>>>>>    static void send_mds_reconnect(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
>>>>>                                struct ceph_mds_session *session)
>>>>> @@ -4024,7 +4022,9 @@ static void check_new_map(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
>>>>>                             oldstate != CEPH_MDS_STATE_STARTING)
>>>>>                                 pr_info("mds%d recovery completed\n", s->s_mds);
>>>>>                         kick_requests(mdsc, i);
>>>>> +                     mutex_unlock(&mdsc->mutex);
>>>>>                         mutex_lock(&s->s_mutex);
>>>>> +                     mutex_lock(&mdsc->mutex);
>>>>>                         ceph_kick_flushing_caps(mdsc, s);
>>>>>                         mutex_unlock(&s->s_mutex);
>>>>>                         wake_up_session_caps(s, RECONNECT);
>>>> Good catch. Merged into testing branch.
>>> These stack traces take up the entire screen and provide very
>>> little information.  Since this is a simple lock ordering issue,
>>> could they be replaced with a short description and perhaps a
>>> reference to mds_client.h where lock dependencies are documented?
>> Hmm, it makes sense.
>>
>> Should I post a V2 ? Or will Jeff do the fix on the testing branch ?
>>
> I went ahead and just fixed it in the testing branch. Let me know if you want to revise the verbiage.
>
That looks good to me.

Thanks Jeff.

BRs

Xiubo
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
index 6c283c5..0e0ab01 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
@@ -3769,8 +3769,6 @@  static int encode_snap_realms(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
  * recovering MDS might have.
  *
  * This is a relatively heavyweight operation, but it's rare.
- *
- * called with mdsc->mutex held.
  */
 static void send_mds_reconnect(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
 			       struct ceph_mds_session *session)
@@ -4024,7 +4022,9 @@  static void check_new_map(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
 			    oldstate != CEPH_MDS_STATE_STARTING)
 				pr_info("mds%d recovery completed\n", s->s_mds);
 			kick_requests(mdsc, i);
+			mutex_unlock(&mdsc->mutex);
 			mutex_lock(&s->s_mutex);
+			mutex_lock(&mdsc->mutex);
 			ceph_kick_flushing_caps(mdsc, s);
 			mutex_unlock(&s->s_mutex);
 			wake_up_session_caps(s, RECONNECT);