@@ -562,14 +562,14 @@ is_valid_oplock_break(struct smb_hdr *buf, struct TCP_Server_Info *srv)
continue;
cifs_stats_inc(&tcon->num_oplock_brks);
- write_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
+ read_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
list_for_each(tmp2, &tcon->openFileList) {
netfile = list_entry(tmp2, struct cifsFileInfo,
tlist);
if (pSMB->Fid != netfile->netfid)
continue;
- write_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
+ read_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
read_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
cFYI(1, ("file id match, oplock break"));
pCifsInode = CIFS_I(netfile->pInode);
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ is_valid_oplock_break(struct smb_hdr *buf, struct TCP_Server_Info *srv)
return true;
}
- write_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
+ read_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
read_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
cFYI(1, ("No matching file for oplock break"));
return true;
...rather than a write lock. It doesn't change the list so a read lock should be sufficient. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> --- fs/cifs/misc.c | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)