From patchwork Mon May 9 22:02:45 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andreas Gruenbacher X-Patchwork-Id: 9050911 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-cifs-client@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D73FBF29F for ; Mon, 9 May 2016 22:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3402011E for ; Mon, 9 May 2016 22:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF0C200E9 for ; Mon, 9 May 2016 22:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753224AbcEIWEb (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 18:04:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56745 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753599AbcEIWE2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 18:04:28 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E636561A05; Mon, 9 May 2016 22:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nux.redhat.com (vpn1-4-7.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.7]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u49M2ulN010220; Mon, 9 May 2016 18:04:21 -0400 From: Andreas Gruenbacher To: Alexander Viro Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , Christoph Hellwig , "Theodore Ts'o" , Andreas Dilger , "J. Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Dave Chinner , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v21 12/22] vfs: Add get_richacl and set_richacl inode operations Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 00:02:45 +0200 Message-Id: <1462831375-23017-13-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1462831375-23017-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> References: <1462831375-23017-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Mon, 09 May 2016 22:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP These operations are similar to the get_acl and set_acl operations for POSIX ACLs. The distinction between access and default ACLs doesn't exist for richacls. Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher Reviewed-by: Steve French --- include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index c569117..ec0bd11 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -1698,6 +1698,7 @@ struct inode_operations { const char * (*get_link) (struct dentry *, struct inode *, struct delayed_call *); int (*permission) (struct inode *, int); struct posix_acl * (*get_acl)(struct inode *, int); + struct richacl * (*get_richacl)(struct inode *); int (*readlink) (struct dentry *, char __user *,int); @@ -1726,6 +1727,7 @@ struct inode_operations { umode_t create_mode, int *opened); int (*tmpfile) (struct inode *, struct dentry *, umode_t); int (*set_acl)(struct inode *, struct posix_acl *, int); + int (*set_richacl)(struct inode *, struct richacl *); } ____cacheline_aligned; ssize_t rw_copy_check_uvector(int type, const struct iovec __user * uvector,