From patchwork Thu Jun 30 13:47:00 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andreas Gruenbacher X-Patchwork-Id: 9207813 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945B36075F for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865E62867F for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 7ACA72865F; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:58:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC312865F for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932204AbcF3N5x (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:57:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34483 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932142AbcF3N5v (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:57:51 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 046FCC049D5C; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nux.redhat.com (vpn1-5-124.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.124]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u5UDlDsk005273; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:48:17 -0400 From: Andreas Gruenbacher To: Alexander Viro Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , Christoph Hellwig , "Theodore Ts'o" , Andreas Dilger , "J. Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Dave Chinner , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v23 09/22] richacl: Permission check algorithm Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:47:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1467294433-3222-10-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1467294433-3222-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> References: <1467294433-3222-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP A richacl roughly grants a requested access if the NFSv4 acl in the richacl grants the requested permissions according to the NFSv4 permission check algorithm and the file mask that applies to the process includes the requested permissions. Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/richacl.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/richacl.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/richacl.c b/fs/richacl.c index 056228f..cb0ef3f 100644 --- a/fs/richacl.c +++ b/fs/richacl.c @@ -338,3 +338,131 @@ restart: acl->a_flags &= ~(RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH | RICHACL_MASKED); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_compute_max_masks); + +/** + * richacl_permission - richacl permission check algorithm + * @inode: inode to check + * @acl: rich acl of the inode + * @want: requested access (MAY_* flags) + * + * Checks if the current process is granted @mask flags in @acl. + */ +int +richacl_permission(struct inode *inode, const struct richacl *acl, + int want) +{ + const struct richace *ace; + unsigned int mask = richacl_want_to_mask(want); + unsigned int requested = mask, denied = 0; + int in_owning_group = in_group_p(inode->i_gid); + int in_owner_or_group_class = in_owning_group; + + /* + * A process is + * - in the owner file class if it owns the file, + * - in the group file class if it is in the file's owning group or + * it matches any of the user or group entries, and + * - in the other file class otherwise. + * The file class is only relevant for determining which file mask to + * apply, which only happens for masked acls. + */ + if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED) { + if ((acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) && + uid_eq(current_fsuid(), inode->i_uid)) { + denied = requested & ~acl->a_owner_mask; + goto out; + } + } else { + /* + * When the acl is not masked, there is no need to determine if + * the process is in the group class and we can break out + * earlier of the loop below. + */ + in_owner_or_group_class = 1; + } + + /* + * Check if the acl grants the requested access and determine which + * file class the process is in. + */ + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) { + unsigned int ace_mask = ace->e_mask; + + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) + continue; + if (richace_is_owner(ace)) { + if (!uid_eq(current_fsuid(), inode->i_uid)) + continue; + goto entry_matches_owner; + } else if (richace_is_group(ace)) { + if (!in_owning_group) + continue; + } else if (richace_is_unix_user(ace)) { + if (!uid_eq(current_fsuid(), ace->e_id.uid)) + continue; + if (uid_eq(current_fsuid(), inode->i_uid)) + goto entry_matches_owner; + } else if (richace_is_unix_group(ace)) { + if (!in_group_p(ace->e_id.gid)) + continue; + } else + goto entry_matches_everyone; + + /* + * Apply the group file mask to entries other than owner@ and + * everyone@ or user entries matching the owner. This ensures + * that we grant the same permissions as the acl computed by + * richacl_apply_masks(). + * + * Without this restriction, the following richacl would grant + * rw access to processes which are both the owner and in the + * owning group, but not to other users in the owning group, + * which could not be represented without masks: + * + * owner:rw::mask + * group@:rw::allow + */ + if ((acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED) && richace_is_allow(ace)) + ace_mask &= acl->a_group_mask; + +entry_matches_owner: + /* The process is in the owner or group file class. */ + in_owner_or_group_class = 1; + +entry_matches_everyone: + /* Check which mask flags the ACE allows or denies. */ + if (richace_is_deny(ace)) + denied |= ace_mask & mask; + mask &= ~ace_mask; + + /* + * Keep going until we know which file class + * the process is in. + */ + if (!mask && in_owner_or_group_class) + break; + } + denied |= mask; + + if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED) { + /* + * The file class a process is in determines which file mask + * applies. Check if that file mask also grants the requested + * access. + */ + if (uid_eq(current_fsuid(), inode->i_uid)) + denied |= requested & ~acl->a_owner_mask; + else if (in_owner_or_group_class) + denied |= requested & ~acl->a_group_mask; + else { + if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) + denied = requested & ~acl->a_other_mask; + else + denied |= requested & ~acl->a_other_mask; + } + } + +out: + return denied ? -EACCES : 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_permission); diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h index 3559b2c..be9fb65 100644 --- a/include/linux/richacl.h +++ b/include/linux/richacl.h @@ -179,5 +179,6 @@ extern int richacl_masks_to_mode(const struct richacl *); extern unsigned int richacl_mode_to_mask(umode_t); extern unsigned int richacl_want_to_mask(unsigned int); extern void richacl_compute_max_masks(struct richacl *); +extern int richacl_permission(struct inode *, const struct richacl *, int); #endif /* __RICHACL_H */