From: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
If we have preventing lock, cifs should overwrite file_lock structure
with info about preventing lock. If we haven't preventing lock, cifs
should leave it unchanged except for the lock type (change it to F_UNLCK).
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>
---
fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
fs/cifs/file.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
@@ -1793,8 +1793,21 @@ CIFSSMBPosixLock(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon,
}
parm_data = (struct cifs_posix_lock *)
((char *)&pSMBr->hdr.Protocol + data_offset);
- if (parm_data->lock_type == cpu_to_le16(CIFS_UNLCK))
+ if (parm_data->lock_type == __constant_cpu_to_le16(CIFS_UNLCK))
pLockData->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
+ else {
+ if (parm_data->lock_type ==
+ __constant_cpu_to_le16(CIFS_RDLCK))
+ pLockData->fl_type = F_RDLCK;
+ else if (parm_data->lock_type ==
+ __constant_cpu_to_le16(CIFS_WRLCK))
+ pLockData->fl_type = F_WRLCK;
+
+ pLockData->fl_start = parm_data->start;
+ pLockData->fl_end = parm_data->start +
+ parm_data->length - 1;
+ pLockData->fl_pid = parm_data->pid;
+ }
}
plk_err_exit:
@@ -838,8 +838,32 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *pfLock)
} else {
/* if rc == ERR_SHARING_VIOLATION ? */
- rc = 0; /* do not change lock type to unlock
- since range in use */
+ rc = 0;
+
+ if (lockType & LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK) {
+ pfLock->fl_type = F_WRLCK;
+ } else {
+ rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length,
+ pfLock->fl_start, 0, 1,
+ lockType | LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK,
+ 0 /* wait flag */);
+ if (rc == 0) {
+ rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid,
+ length, pfLock->fl_start, 1, 0,
+ lockType |
+ LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK,
+ 0 /* wait flag */);
+ pfLock->fl_type = F_RDLCK;
+ if (rc != 0)
+ cERROR(1, ("Error unlocking "
+ "previously locked range %d "
+ "during test of lock", rc));
+ rc = 0;
+ } else {
+ pfLock->fl_type = F_WRLCK;
+ rc = 0;
+ }
+ }
}
FreeXid(xid);
--
1.6.6.1