Message ID | 20190308025823.24382-6-lsahlber@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | cifs: simplify handling of credits for compounds | expand |
чт, 7 мар. 2019 г. в 19:35, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>: > > A negative timeout is the same as the current behaviour, i.e. no timeout. > > Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> > --- > fs/cifs/transport.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c > index f4ec9635dab2..62c58ce80123 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/transport.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c > @@ -478,11 +478,18 @@ smb_send(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_hdr *smb_buffer, > > static int > wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, > - const int flags, unsigned int *instance) > + const int timeout, const int flags, > + unsigned int *instance) > { > int rc; > int *credits; > int optype; > + long int t; > + > + if (timeout < 0) > + t = MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET; > + else > + t = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout); > > optype = flags & CIFS_OP_MASK; > > @@ -507,11 +514,16 @@ wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, > if (*credits < num_credits) { > spin_unlock(&server->req_lock); > cifs_num_waiters_inc(server); > - rc = wait_event_killable(server->request_q, > - has_credits(server, credits, num_credits)); > + rc = wait_event_killable_timeout(server->request_q, > + has_credits(server, credits, num_credits), t); > cifs_num_waiters_dec(server); > - if (rc) > - return rc; > + if (!rc) { > + cifs_dbg(VFS, "wait timed out after %d ms\n", > + timeout); > + return -ENOTSUPP; > + } > + if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS) > + return -ERESTARTSYS; > spin_lock(&server->req_lock); > } else { > if (server->tcpStatus == CifsExiting) { > @@ -537,12 +549,19 @@ wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, > *credits <= MAX_COMPOUND) { > spin_unlock(&server->req_lock); > cifs_num_waiters_inc(server); > - rc = wait_event_killable(server->request_q, > + rc = wait_event_killable_timeout( > + server->request_q, > has_credits(server, credits, > - MAX_COMPOUND + 1)); > + MAX_COMPOUND + 1), > + t); > cifs_num_waiters_dec(server); > - if (rc) > - return rc; > + if (!rc) { > + cifs_dbg(VFS, "wait timed out after %d ms\n", > + timeout); > + return -ENOTSUPP; > + } > + if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS) > + return -ERESTARTSYS; > spin_lock(&server->req_lock); > continue; > } > @@ -569,7 +588,8 @@ static int > wait_for_free_request(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int flags, > unsigned int *instance) > { > - return wait_for_free_credits(server, 1, flags, instance); > + return wait_for_free_credits(server, 1, -1, flags, > + instance); > } > > int > -- > 2.13.6 > We may consider adding trace points for cases where we timed out. Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com> -- Best regards, Pavel Shilovsky
пт, 8 мар. 2019 г. в 17:03, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>: > > Any ideas how to simulate the timeout to test the proposed trace points > We can use Samba's max credit setting and set it to some small number. -- Best regards, Pavel Shilovsky
How about this to add the trace point you requested (I will send out a patch for it on the list) diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c index b3d04018195c..8731cfa66026 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/transport.c +++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c @@ -527,6 +527,8 @@ wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, has_credits(server, credits, num_credits), t); cifs_num_waiters_dec(server); if (!rc) { + trace_smb3_credit_timeout(server->CurrentMid, + server->hostname, num_credits); cifs_dbg(VFS, "wait timed out after %d ms\n", timeout); return -ENOTSUPP; @@ -565,6 +567,9 @@ wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, t); cifs_num_waiters_dec(server); if (!rc) { + trace_smb3_credit_timeout( + server->CurrentMid, + server->hostname, num_credits); cifs_dbg(VFS, "wait timed out after %d ms\n", timeout); return -ENOTSUPP; On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 6:58 PM Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com> wrote: > > чт, 7 мар. 2019 г. в 19:35, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>: > > > > A negative timeout is the same as the current behaviour, i.e. no timeout. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> > > --- > > fs/cifs/transport.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c > > index f4ec9635dab2..62c58ce80123 100644 > > --- a/fs/cifs/transport.c > > +++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c > > @@ -478,11 +478,18 @@ smb_send(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_hdr *smb_buffer, > > > > static int > > wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, > > - const int flags, unsigned int *instance) > > + const int timeout, const int flags, > > + unsigned int *instance) > > { > > int rc; > > int *credits; > > int optype; > > + long int t; > > + > > + if (timeout < 0) > > + t = MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET; > > + else > > + t = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout); > > > > optype = flags & CIFS_OP_MASK; > > > > @@ -507,11 +514,16 @@ wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, > > if (*credits < num_credits) { > > spin_unlock(&server->req_lock); > > cifs_num_waiters_inc(server); > > - rc = wait_event_killable(server->request_q, > > - has_credits(server, credits, num_credits)); > > + rc = wait_event_killable_timeout(server->request_q, > > + has_credits(server, credits, num_credits), t); > > cifs_num_waiters_dec(server); > > - if (rc) > > - return rc; > > + if (!rc) { > > + cifs_dbg(VFS, "wait timed out after %d ms\n", > > + timeout); > > + return -ENOTSUPP; > > + } > > + if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS) > > + return -ERESTARTSYS; > > spin_lock(&server->req_lock); > > } else { > > if (server->tcpStatus == CifsExiting) { > > @@ -537,12 +549,19 @@ wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, > > *credits <= MAX_COMPOUND) { > > spin_unlock(&server->req_lock); > > cifs_num_waiters_inc(server); > > - rc = wait_event_killable(server->request_q, > > + rc = wait_event_killable_timeout( > > + server->request_q, > > has_credits(server, credits, > > - MAX_COMPOUND + 1)); > > + MAX_COMPOUND + 1), > > + t); > > cifs_num_waiters_dec(server); > > - if (rc) > > - return rc; > > + if (!rc) { > > + cifs_dbg(VFS, "wait timed out after %d ms\n", > > + timeout); > > + return -ENOTSUPP; > > + } > > + if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS) > > + return -ERESTARTSYS; > > spin_lock(&server->req_lock); > > continue; > > } > > @@ -569,7 +588,8 @@ static int > > wait_for_free_request(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int flags, > > unsigned int *instance) > > { > > - return wait_for_free_credits(server, 1, flags, instance); > > + return wait_for_free_credits(server, 1, -1, flags, > > + instance); > > } > > > > int > > -- > > 2.13.6 > > > > We may consider adding trace points for cases where we timed out. > > Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com> > > -- > Best regards, > Pavel Shilovsky
diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c index f4ec9635dab2..62c58ce80123 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/transport.c +++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c @@ -478,11 +478,18 @@ smb_send(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_hdr *smb_buffer, static int wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, - const int flags, unsigned int *instance) + const int timeout, const int flags, + unsigned int *instance) { int rc; int *credits; int optype; + long int t; + + if (timeout < 0) + t = MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET; + else + t = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout); optype = flags & CIFS_OP_MASK; @@ -507,11 +514,16 @@ wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, if (*credits < num_credits) { spin_unlock(&server->req_lock); cifs_num_waiters_inc(server); - rc = wait_event_killable(server->request_q, - has_credits(server, credits, num_credits)); + rc = wait_event_killable_timeout(server->request_q, + has_credits(server, credits, num_credits), t); cifs_num_waiters_dec(server); - if (rc) - return rc; + if (!rc) { + cifs_dbg(VFS, "wait timed out after %d ms\n", + timeout); + return -ENOTSUPP; + } + if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS) + return -ERESTARTSYS; spin_lock(&server->req_lock); } else { if (server->tcpStatus == CifsExiting) { @@ -537,12 +549,19 @@ wait_for_free_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int num_credits, *credits <= MAX_COMPOUND) { spin_unlock(&server->req_lock); cifs_num_waiters_inc(server); - rc = wait_event_killable(server->request_q, + rc = wait_event_killable_timeout( + server->request_q, has_credits(server, credits, - MAX_COMPOUND + 1)); + MAX_COMPOUND + 1), + t); cifs_num_waiters_dec(server); - if (rc) - return rc; + if (!rc) { + cifs_dbg(VFS, "wait timed out after %d ms\n", + timeout); + return -ENOTSUPP; + } + if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS) + return -ERESTARTSYS; spin_lock(&server->req_lock); continue; } @@ -569,7 +588,8 @@ static int wait_for_free_request(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int flags, unsigned int *instance) { - return wait_for_free_credits(server, 1, flags, instance); + return wait_for_free_credits(server, 1, -1, flags, + instance); } int
A negative timeout is the same as the current behaviour, i.e. no timeout. Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> --- fs/cifs/transport.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)