Message ID | 20210906134438.14250-1-colin.king@canonical.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [next] ksmbd: add missing assignments to ret on ndr_read_int64 read calls | expand |
2021-09-06 22:44 GMT+09:00, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Currently there are two ndr_read_int64 calls where ret is being checked > for failure but ret is not being assigned a return value from the call. > Static analyis is reporting the checks on ret as dead code. Fix this. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Logical dead code") > Fixes: 303fff2b8c77 ("ksmbd: add validation for ndr read/write functions") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Applied it to my queue. I will send it to Steve after testing. Thanks for your patch!
On (21/09/06 14:44), Colin King wrote: [..] > @@ -275,11 +275,11 @@ int ndr_decode_dos_attr(struct ndr *n, struct xattr_dos_attrib *da) > if (ret) > return ret; > > - ndr_read_int64(n, NULL); > + ret = ndr_read_int64(n, NULL); > if (ret) > return ret; > > - ndr_read_int64(n, NULL); > + ret = ndr_read_int64(n, NULL); > if (ret) > return ret; A pretty nice catch by that static analyzer tool. Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/ndr.c b/fs/ksmbd/ndr.c index a476de291f62..8317f7ca402b 100644 --- a/fs/ksmbd/ndr.c +++ b/fs/ksmbd/ndr.c @@ -275,11 +275,11 @@ int ndr_decode_dos_attr(struct ndr *n, struct xattr_dos_attrib *da) if (ret) return ret; - ndr_read_int64(n, NULL); + ret = ndr_read_int64(n, NULL); if (ret) return ret; - ndr_read_int64(n, NULL); + ret = ndr_read_int64(n, NULL); if (ret) return ret;