diff mbox series

[4/6] netfs: Fix the loop that unmarks folios after writing to the cache

Message ID 20240109112029.1572463-5-dhowells@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series netfs, cachefiles: More additional patches | expand

Commit Message

David Howells Jan. 9, 2024, 11:20 a.m. UTC 
In the loop in netfs_rreq_unmark_after_write() that removes the PG_fscache
from folios after they've been written to the cache, as soon as we remove
the mark from a multipage folio, it can get split - and then we might see a
fragment of folio again.

Guard against this by advancing the 'unlocked' tracker to the index of the
last page in the folio to avoid a double removal of the PG_fscache mark.

Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
---
 fs/netfs/buffered_write.c | 1 +
 fs/netfs/io.c             | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c
index 6cd8f7422e9a..0b2b7a60dabc 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c
@@ -698,6 +698,7 @@  static void netfs_pages_written_back(struct netfs_io_request *wreq)
 	end_wb:
 		if (folio_test_fscache(folio))
 			folio_end_fscache(folio);
+		xas_advance(&xas, folio_next_index(folio) - 1);
 		folio_end_writeback(folio);
 	}
 
diff --git a/fs/netfs/io.c b/fs/netfs/io.c
index 5b5af96cd4b9..4309edf33862 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/io.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/io.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@  static void netfs_rreq_unmark_after_write(struct netfs_io_request *rreq,
 			 */
 			if (have_unlocked && folio_index(folio) <= unlocked)
 				continue;
-			unlocked = folio_index(folio);
+			unlocked = folio_next_index(folio) - 1;
 			trace_netfs_folio(folio, netfs_folio_trace_end_copy);
 			folio_end_fscache(folio);
 			have_unlocked = true;