| Message ID | 20240122123845.3822570-11-dhowells@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | netfs, afs, cifs, cachefiles, erofs: Miscellaneous fixes | expand |
diff --git a/fs/afs/proc.c b/fs/afs/proc.c index 3bd02571f30d..15eab053af6d 100644 --- a/fs/afs/proc.c +++ b/fs/afs/proc.c @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) if (!preflist) { seq_puts(m, "NO PREFS\n"); - return 0; + goto out; } seq_printf(m, "PROT SUBNET PRIOR (v=%u n=%u/%u/%u)\n", @@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ static int afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) } } - rcu_read_lock(); +out: + rcu_read_unlock(); return 0; }
In afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(), we need to unlock the RCU read lock in both places before returning (and not lock it again). Fixes: f94f70d39cc2 ("afs: Provide a way to configure address priorities") Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401172243.cd53d5f6-oliver.sang@intel.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org --- fs/afs/proc.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)