From 390c90c2928a33f2632e9d668cd3b5b769c9b1e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 22:01:31 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] cifs: missing lock when updating session status
Coverity noted a place where we were not grabbing
the ses_lock when setting (and checking) ses_status.
Addresses-Coverity: 1536833 ("Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)")
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
---
fs/cifs/connect.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -1916,19 +1916,22 @@ void cifs_put_smb_ses(struct cifs_ses *ses)
/* ses_count can never go negative */
WARN_ON(ses->ses_count < 0);
+ spin_lock(&ses->ses_lock);
if (ses->ses_status == SES_GOOD)
ses->ses_status = SES_EXITING;
cifs_free_ipc(ses);
if (ses->ses_status == SES_EXITING && server->ops->logoff) {
+ spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock);
xid = get_xid();
rc = server->ops->logoff(xid, ses);
if (rc)
cifs_server_dbg(VFS, "%s: Session Logoff failure rc=%d\n",
__func__, rc);
_free_xid(xid);
- }
+ } else
+ spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock);
spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
list_del_init(&ses->smb_ses_list);
--
2.34.1