Message ID | 20190617022039.7197-2-daniel.sangorrin@toshiba.co.jp (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | [cip-kernel-sec,1/2] remotes: refer to configuration files | expand |
On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 11:20 +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote: > This is probably a copy&paste mistake that had no effect > because the contents of _get_configured_remotes and > _get_configured_branches is the same. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@toshiba.co.jp> Maybe it would make more sense to merge the two functions instead? Ben. > --- > scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py > b/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py > index ae1ca2c..3ede64a 100644 > --- a/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py > +++ b/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ def get_remotes(mappings, mainline=None, > stable=None): > remotes = RemoteMap() > remotes.update(_get_configured_remotes('conf/remotes.yml')) > remotes.update( > - _get_configured_branches( > + _get_configured_remotes( > os.path.expanduser('~/.config/kernel-sec/remotes.yml'))) > for mapping in mappings: > left, right = arg.split(':', 1)
> From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk> > > On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 11:20 +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote: > > This is probably a copy&paste mistake that had no effect > > because the contents of _get_configured_remotes and > > _get_configured_branches is the same. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@toshiba.co.jp> > > Maybe it would make more sense to merge the two functions instead? I thought about that but in the future you may want to add some code that is specific to one of them. If you want me to consolidate them, what name would you use? Thanks, Daniel > > Ben. > > > --- > > scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py > > b/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py > > index ae1ca2c..3ede64a 100644 > > --- a/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py > > +++ b/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py > > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ def get_remotes(mappings, mainline=None, > > stable=None): > > remotes = RemoteMap() > > remotes.update(_get_configured_remotes('conf/remotes.yml')) > > remotes.update( > > - _get_configured_branches( > > + _get_configured_remotes( > > os.path.expanduser('~/.config/kernel-sec/remotes.yml'))) > > for mapping in mappings: > > left, right = arg.split(':', 1) > -- > Ben Hutchings, Software Developer Codethink Ltd > https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street > Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom
On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 23:48 +0000, daniel.sangorrin@toshiba.co.jp wrote: > > From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk> > > > > On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 11:20 +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote: > > > This is probably a copy&paste mistake that had no effect > > > because the contents of _get_configured_remotes and > > > _get_configured_branches is the same. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@toshiba.co.jp> > > > > Maybe it would make more sense to merge the two functions instead? > > I thought about that but in the future you may want to add some code > that is specific to one of them. If you want me to consolidate them, > what name would you use? Actually these two functions aren't exactly the same, since the default return value differs. In practice that doesn't make a difference at the moment, but logically it would be wrong to return one or the other. So I'll apply your original patch. Ben.
diff --git a/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py b/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py index ae1ca2c..3ede64a 100644 --- a/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py +++ b/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ def get_remotes(mappings, mainline=None, stable=None): remotes = RemoteMap() remotes.update(_get_configured_remotes('conf/remotes.yml')) remotes.update( - _get_configured_branches( + _get_configured_remotes( os.path.expanduser('~/.config/kernel-sec/remotes.yml'))) for mapping in mappings: left, right = arg.split(':', 1)
This is probably a copy&paste mistake that had no effect because the contents of _get_configured_remotes and _get_configured_branches is the same. Signed-off-by: Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@toshiba.co.jp> --- scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)