Message ID | 20250319094754.2404386-7-tommaso.merciai.xr@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | serial: sh-sci: Add support for RZ/G3E serial driver | expand |
Hi! > From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> > > commit 8efc440549087de41abadf62f4bde1d827135338 upstream. > > Make sure everyone knows that calling this function needs protection. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506114016.30498-8-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > --- > drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c > index 69f8ac561513..7c93c9a1079b 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c > @@ -1264,6 +1264,7 @@ static int sci_dma_rx_find_active(struct sci_port *s) > return -1; > } > > +/* Must only be called with uart_port_lock taken */ > static void sci_dma_rx_chan_invalidate(struct sci_port *s) > { > unsigned int i; Instead of comment, would lockdep_assert(...) be better / more robust way to accomplish this? Best regards, Pavel
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c index 69f8ac561513..7c93c9a1079b 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c @@ -1264,6 +1264,7 @@ static int sci_dma_rx_find_active(struct sci_port *s) return -1; } +/* Must only be called with uart_port_lock taken */ static void sci_dma_rx_chan_invalidate(struct sci_port *s) { unsigned int i;